The sex of individuals plays an important part in determining their olfactory abilities, with females generally being superior to males. The present review examines the way in which sex differences influence sensitivity, identification, familiarity, and recognition of odours. It also examines whether sex differences are more pronounced with some odours than others, and how sex differences are affected by the manner of testing. Two different explanations for the superiority of females over males in olfaction are evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnetJ. M. (1996). Olfactory memory: A case study in cognitive psychology.Journal of Psychology130, 309–319.
2.
BaloghR. D.PorterR. H. (1986). Olfactory preferences resulting from more exposure in human neonates.Infant Behaviour and Development9, 395–401.
3.
BarberC. E. (1997). Olfactory acuity as a function of age and gender: A comparison of African and American samples.International Journal of Aging and Human Development44, 317–334.
4.
BaydarA.PetrizkaM.SchottM. P. (1993). Olfactory thresholds for androstenone and Galaxolide: Sensitivity, insensitivity and specific anosmia.Chemical Senses18, 661–668.
5.
BoulouxP. M. G.MunroeP.KirkJ.BesserG. M. (1992). Sex and smell—an enigma resolved.Journal of Endocrinology133, 323–326.
6.
BrandG. (1999). La latéralisation olfactive chez l'homme. Revue de la littérature.Neurophysiologie Clinique29, 495–506.
7.
BromleyS. M.DotyR. L. (1995). Odor recognition is better under bilateral than unilateral test conditions.Cortex31, 25–40.
8.
CainW. S. (1982). Odor identification by males and females: Predictions versus performance.Chemical Senses7, 129–142.
9.
CohnN. B.KircherJ.EmmersonR. Y.DustmanR. E. (1985). Pattern reversal evoked potentials: Age, sex and hemispheric asymmetry.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology62, 399–406.
10.
ConklinH.PolemicsJ. (1997). Brain dimorphisms and sex: A review.International Journal of Comparative Psychology10, 25–26.
11.
DorriesK. M.SchmidtH. J.BeauchampG. K.WysockiC. J. (1989). Changes in sensitivity to the odour of androstenone during adolescence.Developmental Psychobiology22, 423–435.
12.
DotyR. L. (1977). A review of recent psychophysical studies examining the possibility of chemical communication of sex and reproductive state in humans.Chemical signals in vertebrates.Muller-SchwarzeD.MozellM. M.New York: Plenum Press273–286.
13.
DotyR. L. (1986). Gender and endocrine-related influences upon olfactory function.Clinical measurement of taste and smell.MeiselmanH. L.RivlinR. S.New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc377–413.
14.
DotyR. L. (1987). The primates III: Humans.Social odours in mammals.BrownR. E.MacDonaldD. W.Oxford: Oxford University Press806–832.
15.
DotyR. L. (1991). Influences of aging on human olfactory function.The human sense of smell.LaingD. G.DotyR. L.BreipohlW.Berlin: Springer-Verlag155–163.
16.
DotyR. L. (1991b). Olfactory function in neonates.The human sense of smell.LaingD. G.DotyR. L.BreipohlW.Berlin: Springer-Verlag181–195.
17.
DotyR. L. (1997). Studies of human olfaction from the university of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center.Chemical Senses22, 565–586.
18.
DotyR. L.ApplebaumS.ZushoH.SettleR. G. (1985). Sex differences in odor identification ability: A cross-cultural analysis.Neuropsychologia23, 667–672.
19.
DotyR. L.BromleyS. M.MobergP. J.HummelT. (1997). Laterality in human nasal chemoreception.Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing.ChristmanS.Amsterdam: Elsevier497–542.
20.
DotyR. L.GreenP. A.RamC.YankellS. L. (1982). Communication of gender from human breath odors: Relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness.Hormones and Behaviour16, 13–22.
21.
DotyR. L.HallJ. W.FlickingerG. L.SondheimerS. J. (1982). Cyclical changes in olfactory and auditory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle: No attenuation by oral contraceptive medication.Olfaction and endocrine regulation.BreipohlW.London: IRL Press35–42.
22.
DotyR. L.ShamanP.ApplebaumS.GibersonR.SikorskyL.RosenbergL. (1984). Smell identification ability: Changes with age.Science226, 1441–1443.
23.
DotyR. L.SnyderP.HugginsG.LowryL. D. (1981). Endocrine, cardiovascular and psychological correlates of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology95, 45–60.
24.
EllisR. S. (1928). The psychology of individual differencesNew York: Appleton.
25.
EngenT. (1987). Remembering odors and their names.American Scientist75, 497–503.
26.
EvansW. J.CuiL.StarrA. (1995). Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: Effects of age and gender.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology95, 293–301.
27.
FilsingerE. E.BraunJ. J.MonteW. C. (1990). Sex differences in response to the odor of alpha androstenone.Perceptual and Motor Stills70, 216–218.
28.
FilsingerE. E.BraunJ. J.MonteW. C.UnderD. (1984). Human (Homo sapiens) responses to the pig (Sus Scrofa) sei pheromone 5-alpha-androst-16-en-3-one.Journal of Comperative Psychology98, 219–222.
29.
GaleA.BrownA.OsborneK.SmallboneA. (1978). Further evidence of sex differences in brain organization.Biological Psychology6, 203–208.
30.
GilbertA. N.KnaskoS. C.SabiniJ. (1997). Sex differences in task performance associated with attention to ambient odor.Archives of Environment and Health52, 195–199.
31.
GrammerK. (1993). 5α-androst-16-en-3-one: A male pheromone? A brief report.Ethology and Sociobiology14, 201–208.
32.
GriepM. I.CollysK.MetsT. F.SlopD.LaskaM.MassartD. L. (1996). Sensory detection of food odour in relation to dental status, gender and age.Gcrodontology13, 56–62.
33.
GriffithsN. M.PattersonR. L. S. (1970). Human olfactory responses to 5-alpha-androst-16-en-3-one principal component of boar taint.Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture21, 4–6.
34.
GustavsonA. R.DawsonM. E.BonettD. G. (1987). Androstenol, a putative human pheromone, affects human male choice performance.Journal of Comparative Psychology101, 210–212.
35.
HenkinsR. I. (1997). Brain mapping of olfaction by functional magnetic resonance imaging: Differences between men and women.Aromachology Review6, 1–3.
36.
HerzR. S.EngenT. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review3, 300–313.
37.
HoldB.SchleidtM. (1977). The importance of human odor in non verbal communication.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie43, 225–238.
38.
HornungD. E.DonaldA.LeopoldM. D. (1999). Relationship between uninasal anatomy and uninasal olfactory ability.Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery125, 53–58.
39.
HudsonR. (1999). From molecule to mind: The role of experience in shaping olfactory function.Journal of Comparative Physiology A185, 297–304.
40.
JacobS.MacClintockM. K. (2000). Psychological state and mood effects of steroidal chemosignals in women and men.Hormones and Behaviour37, 57–58.
41.
JehlC.RoyetJ.-P.HolleyA. (1995). Odor discrimination and recognition as a function of familiarization.Perception and Psychophysics57, 1002–1011.
42.
Kirk-SmithM. C.BoothD. A. (1980). Effects of androstenone on choice of location in other's presence.Olfaction and taste VII.Van der StarreH.London: IRL Press397–400.
43.
KloekJ. (1961). The smell of some steroid sex-hormones and their metabolites.Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurochirurgy64, 309–344.
44.
KluktyN. (1990). Geschlechtsunterschiede in der Gedachtnisleistung für Geruche, Tonfolgen und Farben.Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie37, 437–446.
45.
KoelegaH. S. (1970). Extraversion, sex arousal and olfactory sensitivity.Acta Psychologica34, 51–56.
46.
KoelegaH. S. (1980). Preference for and sensitivity to the odours of androstenone and musk.Olfaction and taste VII.Van der StarreH.London: IRL Press436.
47.
KoelegaH. S. (1994). Sex differences in olfactory sensitivity and the problem of the generality of smell acuity.Perceptual and Motor Skills78, 203–213.
48.
KoelegaH. S.KosterE. P. (1974). Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences237, 234–246.
49.
KopalaL.ClarkC. (1990). Implications of olfactory agnosia for understanding sex differences in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin16, 255–261.
50.
KopalaL.ClarkC.HurwtizT. A. (1989). Sex differences in olfactory function in schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychiatry146, 1320–1322.
51.
LarssonM. (1997). Semantic factors in episodic recognition of common odors in early and late adulthood: A review.Chemical Senses22, 623–633.
52.
LarssonM.BäckmanL. (1993). Semantic activation and episodic odor recognition in young and older adults.Psychology and Aging8, 582–588.
53.
LarssonM.BäckmanL. (1997). Age-related differences in episodic odor recognition: The role of access to specific odor names.Memory5, 361–378.
54.
LaskaM.KochB.HeidB.HudsonR. (1996). Failure to demonstrate systematic changes in olfactory perception in the course of pregnancy: A longitudinal study.Chemical Senses21, 567–571.
55.
LehrnerJ. (1993). Gender differences in long-term odor recognition memory: Verbal versus sensory influences and consistency of label use.Chemical Senses18, 17–26.
56.
LehrnerJ.GlückJ.LaskaM. (1999). Odor identification, consistency of label use, olfactory threshold and their relationships to odor memory over the human lifespan.Chemical Senses24, 337–346.
57.
Le MagnenJ. (1952). Les phénomènes olfacto-sexuels chez l'homme.Archives des Sciences Physiologiques6, 125–160.
58.
Le MagnenJ. (1982). Olfacto-endocrine relationships: Past and future lines of investigations.Olfaction and endocrine regulation.BreipohlW.London: IRL Press1–9.
59.
LeopoldD. A. (1988). The relationship between nasal anatomy and human olfaction.Laryngoscope189, 371–381.
60.
LevyL. M.HenkinR. I.HutterA.LinC. S.MartinsD.SchellingerD. (1997). Functional MRI of human olfaction.Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography21, 849–856.
61.
LevyL. M.HenkinR. I.LinC. S.HutterA.SchellingerD. (1999). Odor memory induces brain activation as measured by functional MRI.Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography23, 487–498.
62.
LorigT. S. (1999). On the similarity of odor and language perception.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review23, 391–398.
63.
MacClintockM. K. (1971). Menstrual synchrony and suppression.Nature229, 244–245.
64.
MakinJ. W.PorterR. H. (1989). Attractiveness of lactating females breast odors to neonates.Child Development60, 803–810.
65.
MarlierL.SchaalB.Olfactory, tactile and auditory cues in the recognition of individuality in children.Paper presented at the 21st International Ethological Conference.Utrecht, The Netherlands1989 abstract p. 108.
66.
MarlierL.SchaalB.SoussignanR. (1998). Neonatal responsiveness to the odor of amniotic and lacteal fluids: A test of perinatal chemosensory continuity.Child Development69, 611–623.
67.
MeisamiZ.MikhailL.BairnD.BhatnagarK. P. (1998). Human olfactory bulb: Aging of glomeruli and mitral cells and a search for the accessory olfactory bulb.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences855, 708–715.
68.
MillotJ. L.BrandG. (2000). Lateralization of spontaneous smelling behaviors by humans.Perceptual and Motor Skills90, 444–450.
69.
PorterR. H.MooreJ. D. (1981). Human kin recognition by olfactory cues.Physiology and Behaviour27, 493–495.
70.
RichardsonJ. T. E.ZuccoG. M. (1989). Cognition and olfaction: A review.Psychological Bulletin105, 352–360.
71.
RichmanR. A.PostE. M.SheeheP. R.WrightH. N. (1992). Olfactory performance during childhood. I. Development of an odorant identification test for children.Journal of Pediatrics121, 908–911.
72.
RikowskiA.GrammerK. (1999). Human body odor, symmetry and attractiveness.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B266, 869–874.
73.
SchaalB. (1996). Olfaction in infants and children: Developmental and functional perspectives.Chemical Senses13, 145–190.
74.
SchaalB. (1996). Olfaction et processus sociaux chez l'homme: Bref bilan.Revue Internationale de Psychopathologie22, 387–421.
75.
SchabF. R.CrowderR. G. (1995). Memory for odorsHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
76.
SchleidtM.HoldB.AttiliG. (1981). A cross-cultural study on the attitude towards personal odours.Journal of Chemical Ecology7, 19–31.
77.
SegalN.TopolskiT. D.WilsonS. M.BrownK. W.ArakiL. (1995). Twin analysis of odor identification and perception.Physiology and Behaviour57, 605–609.
78.
ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E.PughK. R.ConstableR. T.SkudhrskiP.FulbrightR. K.BronenR. A.FletcherJ. M.ShankweilerD. P.KatzL.GoreJ. C. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language.Nature373, 607–609.
79.
ShipJ. A.PearsonJ. D.CruiseL. J.BrantL. J.MetterE. J. (1996). Longitudinal changes in smell identification.Journal of Gerontology51, 86–91.
80.
ShipJ. A.WeiffenbachJ. M. (1993). Age, gender, medical treatment, and medication effects on smell identification.Journal of Gerontology48, 26–32.
81.
SternK.MacClintockM. K. (1998). Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones.Nature392, 177–179.
82.
StevensD. A.O'ConnellR. J. (1991). Individual differences in thresholds and quality reports of human subjects to various odors.Chemical Senses16, 57–67.
83.
ToulouseE.VaschideN. (1899a). Mesure de l'odorat chez les enfants.Compte-Rendus de la Société de Biologie5l, 487–489.
84.
ToulouseE.VaschideN. (1899b). Mesure de l'odorat chez l'homme et chez la femme.Compte-Rendus de la Société de Biologie5l, 381–383.
85.
Van TollerC.Kirk-SmithM.WoodN.LombardJ.DoddG. H. (1983). Skin conductance and subjective assessments associated with the odour of a 5-a-androstenone-3-one.Biological Psychology16, 85–107.
86.
VelleW. (1987). Sex differences in sensory functions.Perspectives in Biology and Medicine4, 490–523.
87.
VelleW. (1992). Sex differences in sensory functions.The nature of sexes: The sociobiology of sex differences and “the battle of the sexes”.Van der DennenJ. M. G.Groningen: Origin Press29–54.
88.
VerronH.GaultierC. (1976). Processus olfactifs et structures relationnelles.Psychologie Française21, 205–209.
89.
WallaceP. (1977). Individual discrimination of humans by odors.Physiology and Behaviour19, 577–579.
90.
WedekindC.FüriS. (1997). Body odour preferences in men and women: Do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simple heterozygosity.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B264, 1471–1479.
91.
WysockiC. J.BeauchampG. K. (1991). Individual differences in human olfaction.Chemical senses: Vol. 3. Genetics of perception and communications.WysockiC. J.KareM. R.New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc353–373.
92.
WysockiC. J.DomesK. M.BeauchampG. K. (1989). Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA86, 7976–7978.
93.
WysockiC. J.GilbertA. N. (1989). National geographic smell survey: Effects of age are heterogeneous.Annals of the NewYork Academy of Sciences561, 12–28.
94.
YousemD. M.MaldjianJ. A.SiddiqiF.HummelT.AlsopD. C.GeckleR. J.BilkerW. B.DotyR. L. (1999). Gender effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging.Brain Research818, 480–487.
95.
ZatorreR. J.Jones-GotmanM. (1990). Right nostril advantage for discrimination of odor.Perception and Psychophysics47, 526–531.
