Perceptual Categorization: Connectionist Modelling and Decision Rules

Abstract

Although it is currently popular to model human associative learning using connectionist networks, the mechanism by which their output activations are converted to probabilities of response has received relatively little attention. Several possible models of this decision process are considered here, including a simple ratio rule, a simple difference rule, their exponential versions, and a winner-take-all network. Two categorization experiments that attempt to dissociate these models are reported. Analogues of the experiments were presented to a single-layer, feed-forward, delta-rule network. Only the exponential ratio rule and the winner-take-all architecture, acting on the networks’ output activations that corresponded to responses available on test, were capable of fully predicting the mean response results. In addition, unlike the exponential ratio rule, the winner-take-all model has the potential to predict latencies. Further studies will be required to determine whether latencies produced under more stringent conditions conform to the model's predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradley

R. A.

(1954). Incomplete block rank analysis: On the appropriateness of the model for a method of paired comparison. Biometrics 10, 375–390.

Estes

W. K.

(1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review 57, 94–107.

Gluck

M. A.

Bower

G. H.

(1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 227–247.

Greenhouse

S. W.

Geisser

(1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 95–112.

Hopkins

J. W.

(1954). Incomplete block rank analysis: Some taste test results. Biometrics 10, 391–399.

Luce

R. D.

(1963). Detection and recognition. Handbook of psychology. Luce

Bush

R. R.

Galanter

New York: Wiley Volume 1.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1974). The psychology of animal learning London: Academic Press.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1983). Conditioning and associative learning oxford: Oxford University Press.

McClelland

J. L.

Elman

J. L.

(1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18, 1–86.

10.

McClelland

J. L.

Rumelhart

D. E.

(1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 375–407.

11.

McClelland

J. L.

Rumelhart

D. E.

(1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114, 159–188.

12.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Bennett

C. H.

Guttman-Nahir

Kim

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1995). Prototype effects and peak shift in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory and Cognition 21, 662–673.

13.

Pearce

J. M.

(1997). Animal learning and cognition. An introduction. 2nd ed. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.

14.

Rescorla

R. A.

Wagner

A. R.

(1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning: Vol. II. Current research and theory. Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. F.

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

15.

Shanks

D. R.

(1991). Some parallels between associative learning and object clasification. From animals to animats. Meyer

J. A.

Wilson

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 337–343.

16.

Shanks

D. R.

(1995). The psychology of associative learning Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Wagner

A. R.

Logan

F. A.

Haberlandt

Price

(1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76, 171–180.

18.

Wills

A. J.

McLaren

I. P. L.

(1997). Generalization in human category learning: A connectionist account of differences in gradient after discriminative and non-discriminative training. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 607–630.