Many developmental models of arithmetic problem solving assume that any algorithmic solution of a given problem results in an association of the two operands and the answer in memory (Logan & Klapp, 1991; Siegler, 1996). In this experiment, adults had to perform either an operation or a comparison on the same pairs of two-digit numbers and then a recognition task. It is shown that unlike comparisons, the algorithmic solution of operations impairs the recognition of operands in adults. Thus, the postulate of a necessary and automatic storage of operands-answer associations in memory when young children solve additions by algorithmic strategies needs to be qualified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. T.AnhaltJ. M.DykmanR. A. (1986). Arithmetic automatization failure in children with attention and reading disorders: Associations and sequela.Journal of Learning Disabilities19, 4222–232.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1993). Rules of the mindHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3.
AndersonJ. R.LebiereC. (1998). Atomic components of thoughtHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4.
AshcraftM. H.BattagliaJ. (1978). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory4, 527–538.
5.
AshcraftM. H.FiermanB. A. (1982). Mental addition in third, fourth, and fifth graders.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology33, 216–234.
6.
AshcraftM. H.StazykE. H. (1981). Mental addition: A set of three verification models.Memory & Cognition9, 185–196.
7.
BaroodyA. J. (1987). The development of counting strategies for single-digit addition.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education18, 141–157.
8.
BarrouilletP.FayolM. (1998). From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval. Evidence from number- and alphabetic-arithmetic in children and adults.Memory & Cognition26, 355–368.
9.
CampbellJ. I. D.GrahamD. J. (1985). Mental multiplication skill: Structure, process, and acquisition.Canadian Journal of Psychology39, 338–366.
10.
CarpenterT. P.MoserJ. M. (1983). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts.Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes.LeschR.LandauM.New York: Academic Press.
11.
CaseR.KurlandM.GoldbergJ. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology33, 386–404.
12.
CohenL.DehaeneS. (1994). Amnesia for arithmetic facts: A single case study.Brain and Language47, 214–232.
13.
DehaeneS. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition44, 1–42.
14.
DowkerA. (1998). Individual differences in normal arithmetic development.The development of mathematical skills.DonlanC.Hove, UK: Psychology Press275–302.
15.
FleischnerJ. E.GarnettK.ShepherdM. (1982). Proficiency in arithmetic basic fact computation of learning disabled and non disabled children.Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics4, 47–55.
16.
FusonK. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting on solution procedure in addition.Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective.CarpenterT. P.MoserJ. M.RombergT. A.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc67–81.
17.
GarnettK.FleischnerJ. E. (1983). Automatization and basic fact performance of normal and learning disabled children.Learning Disability Quarterly6, 223–230.
18.
GearyD. C.WidamanK. F.LittleT. D.CormierP. (1987). Cognitive addition: Comparison of learning disabled and academically normal elementary school children.Cognitive Development2, 3249–269.
19.
GearyD. C.BrownS. C.SamaranayakeV. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed of processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children.Developmental Psychology28, 5787–797.
20.
GroenG. J.ParkmanJ. M. (1972). A Chronometric analysis of simple addition.Psychological Review79, 329–343.
21.
KellerT. A.CowanN. (1994). Developmental increase in the duration of memory for tone pitch.Developmental Psychology30, 855–863.
22.
KruegerL. E. (1986). Why 2*2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification.Memory and Cognition14, 141–149.
23.
LefevreJ.SadeskyG. S.BisanzJ. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 216–230.
24.
LoganG. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review95, 492–527.
25.
LoganG. D.KlappS. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 179–195.
26.
LoganG. D.TaylorS. E.EthertonJ. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 620–638.
27.
MacarusoP.SokolS. M. (1998). Cognitive neuropsychology and developmental dyscalculia.The development of mathematical skills.DonlanC.Hove, UK: Psychology Press201–225.
28.
SaultsJ. S.CowanN. (1996). The development of memory for ignored speech.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology63, 239–261.
29.
SieglerR. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General116, 250–264.
30.
SieglerR. S. (1988). Individual differences in strategy choice: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists.Child Development59, 833–851.
31.
SieglerR. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinkingNew York: Oxford University Press.
32.
SieglerR. S.ShipleyC. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change.Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling.SimonT. J.HalfordG. S.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33.
SieglerR. S.ShragerJ. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do?.Origins of cognitive skills.SophianC.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34.
SokolS. M.MacarusoP.GollanT. H. (1994). Developmental dyscalculia and cognitive neuropsychology.Developmental Neuropsychology10, 413–441.
35.
TempleC. M. (1991). Procedural dyscalculia and number fact dyscalculia: Double dissociation in developmental dyscalculia.Cognitive Neuropsychology8, 2155–176.
36.
TowseJ. N.HitchG. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity?.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology48A, 1108–124.
37.
TowseJ. N.HitchG. J.HuttonU. (1998). A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children.Journal of Memory and Language39, 195–217.
38.
WarringtonE. K. (1982). The fractionation of arithmetical skills: A single case study.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology34A, 31–51.
39.
WickensD. D.MoodyM. J.DowR. (1981). The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110, 1–20.
40.
ZbrodoffN. J. (1995). Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explandtion of the problem-size effect.Memory and Cognition23, 689–700.
