Previous research has shown that the expression of implicit sequence learning is eliminated in a choice reaction time task when an explicit cue allows participants to accurately predict the next stimulus (Cleeremans, 1997), but that two contingencies predicting the same outcome can be learned and expressed simultaneously when both of them remain implicit (Jiménez & Méndez, 1999). Two experiments tested the hypothesis that it is the deliberate use of explicit knowledge that produces the inhibitory effects over the expression of implicit sequence learning. However, the results of these experiments do not support this hypothesis, rather showing that implicit learning is acquired and expressed regardless of the influence of explicit knowledge. These results are interpreted as reinforcing the thesis about the automatic nature of both the acquisition and the expression of implicit sequence learning. The contradictory results reported by Cleeremans are attributed to a floor effect derived from the use of a special type of explicit cue.
BuchnerA.FaulF.ErdfelderE. (1992). GPOWER: A priori-, post-hoc and compromise pawer analyses for the Macintosh [Computer program]Bonn, Germany: Bonn University.
3.
CheesmanJ.MerikleP. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology40, 343–367.
4.
CleeremansA. (1997). Sequence learning in a dual-stimulus setting.Psychological Research60, 72–86.
5.
CleeremansA.DestrebecqzA.BoyerM. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front.Trends in Cognitive Sciences2, 406–416.
6.
CleeremansA.JiménezL. (1998). Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details.Handbook of implicit learning.StadlerM. A.FrenschP. A.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage323–364.
7.
CleeremansA.McClellandJ. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General120, 235–253.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciencesHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9.
CohenA.IvryR. I.KeeleS. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition16, 17–30.
10.
FrenschP. A. (1998). One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define implicit learning.Handbook of implicit learning.StadlerM. A.FrenschP. A.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage47–104.
11.
JiménezL. (1997). Implicit learning: Conceptual and methodological issues.Psychologica Belgien37, 9–28.
12.
JiménezL.MéndezC. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition25, 236–259.
13.
JiménezL.MéndezC.CleeremansA. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 948–969.
14.
JuolaJ. F.KoshinoH.WarnerC. B. (1995). Tradeoff between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.Perception and Psychophysks57, 333–342.
15.
LoganG. D.EthertonJ. L. (1994). What is learned during automatizatioan? The role of attention in constructing an instance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20, 1022–1050.
16.
LoganG. D.TaylorS. E.EthertonJ. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 620–638.
17.
MarcelA. J. (1980). Conscious and preconsaous recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context.Attention ana performance.NickersonR. R.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.VIII, 435–457.
18.
MayrU. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 350–364.
19.
NattkemperD.PrinzW. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task.Psychological Research60, 98–112.
20.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General106, 226–254.
21.
NissenM. J.BullemerP. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology19, 1–32.
22.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32, 2–25.
23.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control.Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium.SolsoR. L.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24.
WarnerC. B.JuolaJ. F.KoshinoH. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attentioan.Perception and Psychophysics48, 243–251.
25.
WhittleseaB. W. A. (1997). The representation of general and particular knowledge.Knowledge, concepts, and categories.LambertsK.ShanksD.Hove, UK: Psychology Press335–370.
26.
WillinghamD. B.NissenM. J.BullemerP. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 1047–1060.
27.
ZiesslerM. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 962–978.
