We report that spatial cueing of a parafoveal target in the presence of distractors enhances orientational acuity for that target. When no distractors were present, orientation thresholds were in the range 1–4°. For long exposure times, distractors increased threshold by the amount predicted from a winner-takes-all spatial uncertainty model. For short (100-msec) exposures followed by a random dot mask, the rise in threshold with distractors was considerably greater than that predicted from spatial uncertainty. For brief exposures the effect of distractors was greater when the target and distractors were spatially crowded rather than widely spaced. Adding a tilt to the distractors in the opposite direction to the target increased thresholds still further. Cueing the target with a spatial pointer decreased the effect of distractors, even when they were crowded. We suggest that when attention cannot be appropriately focused, discrimination is carried out by a relatively coarse texture analyser, which averages over several elements, and that focused attention permits the analysis of the target over a smaller area of space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckJ. (1982). Textural segmentation.BeckJ.Organization and representation in perception.Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2.
BergenJ. R.AdelsonE. H. (1988). Early vision and texture perception.Nature (London)333, 363–364.
3.
BergenJ. R.JuleszB. (1983). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.Nature (London)303, 696–698.
4.
BockG. R.GoodeJ.Higher-order processing in the visual system.Chichester: Wiley1994.
5.
ChealM. L.LyonD. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology43A, 859–880.
6.
ChealM.LyonD. R. (1994). Allocation of attention in texture segregation, visual search, and location-precuing paradigms.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology47A, 49–70.
7.
De ValoisR. L.YundE. W.HeplerH. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.Vision Research22, 531–544.
8.
DuncanJ. (1989). Boundary conditions on parallel processing in human vision.Perception18, 457–469.
9.
DuncanJ.HumphreysG. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review96, 433–458.
10.
FinneyD. J. (1971). Probit analysisCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GrahamN. (1989). Visual pattern analysersOxford: Oxford University PressVol. 16.
12.
GrahamN.BeckJ.SutterA. (1992). Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture: Effects of sign and amount of contrast.Vision Research32, 719–743.
13.
GrahamN.KramerP.HaberN. (1985). Attending to the spatial frequency and spatial position of near-threshold visual patterns.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Attention and performance 11.London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd269–284.
14.
GrindleyG. C.TownsendV. (1968). Voluntary attention in peripheral vision and its effects on acuity and differential thresholds.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 11–19.
15.
HawkinsH. L.HillyardS. A.LuckS. J.MoulouaM.DowningC. J.WoodwardD. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16, 802–811.
16.
HeS.CavanaghP.IntriligatorJ. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.Nature (London)383, 334–337.
17.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex.Journal of Physiology148, 574–591.
18.
KeebleD. R. T.KingdomF. A. A.MouldenB.MorganM. J. (1995). The detection of orientationally multimodal textures.Vison Research14, 1991–2005.
19.
MatikJ.PeromaP. (1990). Preattentive texture discrimination with early visual mechanisms.Journal of the Optical Society of AmericaA7, 923–932.
20.
McKeeS. P. (1985). The challenge of the real observer.Frontiers of Visual Science: Proceedings of the 1985 SymposiumWashington: National Academy Press38–50.
21.
MorganM. J. (1990). Hyperacuity. In ReganD. M. (Ed). Spatial vision.London: Macmillan.
22.
MorganM. J. (1994). Chairman's Introduction.BockG. R.GoodeJ.Higher order processing in visual perception.Chichester: Wiley.
23.
MorganM. J.BaldassiS. (1998). Are there seperate ‘Fourier’ and ‘non-Fourier’ mechanisms for orientation discrimination? Manuscript in preparation.
24.
MorganM. J.HotopfN. (1989). Perceived diagonals in grids and lattices.Vision Research29, 1005–1015.
25.
MouldenB. (1992). Collator units: Second-stage orientational filters.BockG. R.GoodeJ.Higher order processing in visual perception.Chichester: John Wiley.
26.
NothdurftH. C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.Vision Research31, 1073–1078.
27.
PalmerJ. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.Vision Research32, 1703–1721.
28.
PalmerJ.AmesC. T.LindseyD. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19, 108–130.
29.
PelliD. G. (1986). Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.Journal of the Optical Society of America A2, 91508–1532.
30.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R.DavidsonB. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109, 160–174.
31.
ShawM. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments.ShawM. L.Attention and performance.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncVol. X.
32.
ShiuL. P.PashlerH. (1994). Negligible effects of spatial precuing on identification of single digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 1037–1054.
33.
TownsendJ. T. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix.Perception and Psychophysics9, IA40–50.
34.
VergheseP.NakayamaK. (1994). Stimulus discriminability and visual search.Vision Research34, 2453–2467.
35.
WattR. J.AndrewsD. P. (1981). APE: Adaptive probit estimation of a psychometric function.Current Psychological Reviews1, 205–214.
36.
WestheimerG. (1979). The spatial sense of the eye.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science18, 893–912.
37.
WestheimerG. (1981). Visual hyperacuity.Progress in Sensory Physiology1, 2–29.
38.
WolfeJ. M. (1992). “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing.Vision Research32, 757–763.
