The relationship between city size, urban growth, and the metropolitan income distribution is discussed in this paper. Drawing on basic economic theory we develop the 'monopoly' hypothesis which suggests that increases in city size and urban growth will lead to greater income inequality. The monopoly hypothesis suggests that increases in size and growth raise monopoly rents earned by those insulated from competition. Regression results using the Gini concentration ratio as a measure of family and male income inequality on 1970 are consistent with the hypothesis. Our results suggest the benefits of urban growth are unevenly distributed and increase measured income inequality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aigner, D.O. and Heins, A.J. (1967). On the determinants of income equality. American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1: 175-84.
2.
Al-Samarrie, A. and Miller, H.P. (1967). State differentials in income concentration. American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1: 59-72.
3.
Burns, L.S. (1976). The urban income distribution: a human capital explanation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 5, No. 4: 465-82.
4.
Conlisk, J. (1967). Some cross-state evidence on income inequality . Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, No. 1: 115-18.
5.
Duncan, O.D. and Reiss, A. (1956). Social Characteristics of Urban and Rural Communities, 1950. New York: Wiley.
6.
Farbman, M. (1975). The size distribution of family income in U.S. SMSAs, 1959. The Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 2, No. 1: 217-37.
7.
Frech, H.E. and Burns, L.S. (1971). Metropolitan interpersonal income inequality: a comment. Land Economics, Vol. 47, No. 1: 104-6.
8.
Gastwirth, J. (1972). The estimation of the Lorenz curve and gini coefficient . Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, No. 3: 306-16.
9.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 1: 1-28.
10.
Mathur, V.K. (1970). Occupational composition and its determinants: an intercity size class analysis. Journal of Regional Science , Vol. 10, No. 1: 81-91.
11.
Matilla, J. and Thompson, W. (1968). Toward an econometric model of urban economic development. In Perloff, H. and Wingo, L. eds., Issues in Urban Economics . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press .
12.
Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 66, No. 4: 281-302.
13.
Murray, B.B. (1969). Metropolitan interpersonal income inequality. Land Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1: 121-5.
14.
Richardson,H.W. (1973). The Economics of Urban Size. Westmead: Saxon House.
15.
Thompson, W.R. (1965). A Preface to Urban Economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
