Estimates of natural phenomena with spatial correlation, i.e. stationary domains, are more precise and accurate when performed using geostatistical techniques (e.g. kriging). The kriging estimates require the definition of the spatial continuity model and a search strategy. Many techniques, such as unfolding and dynamic anisotropy, try to give some improvement in the estimates, considering the variations of the distributions in the geological bodies, however, the definition of the search strategy in the other parameters is unique. This study presents an alternative to this, called Localized Kriging Parameters optimization (LKPO). LKPO considers the best local kriging parameters settings (block by block) through the local uncertainly (simulations). To illustrate this methodology, a synthetic dataset is presented, and the results are compared with the methodologies currently available in the geostatistical literature. Validation checks show a significant improvement in precision and accuracy on the estimates when using local kriging parameters.
AbediniMJ, NasseriM, BurnDH.2012. The use of a genetic algorithm-based search strategy in geostatistics: application to a set of anisotropic piezometric head data.Comput Geosci. 41:136–146. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.024.
2.
AbzalovMZ.2006. Localised uniform conditioning (LUC): a new approach for direct modelling of small blocks.Math Geol. 38(4):393–411.
AbzalovMZ, HumphreysM.2002. Geostatistically assisted domaining of structurally complex mineralisation: method and case studies. Geostatistically assisted domaining of structurally complex mineralisation: method and case studies. In The AusIMM 2002 Conference: 150 years of mining, Publication series No 6/02; p. 345–350.
5.
BoisvertJB, ManchukJG, DeutschCV.2009. Kriging in the presence of locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances.Math Geosci. 41(5):585–601. doi:10.1007/s11004-009-9229-1.
6.
BoyleC.2010. Kriging neighbourhood analysis by slope of regression and weight of mean – evaluation with the Jura data set.Min Technol. 119(2):49–58. doi:10.1179/037178410X12741755140804.
7.
ChandermanL, DohmCE, MinnittRCA.2017. 3D geological modelling and resource estimation for a gold deposit in Mali.J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 117(2):189–197. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2017/v117n2a10.
8.
CoombesJ, BoamahP.2015. Local kriging neighbourhood optimisation.Proceedings of the Africa Australia Technical Mining Conference. Australasian Institute of Mining and MetallurgySage UK: London, England. p. 27–35.
9.
CoombesJ, TranT, EarlA.2020. Going local: innovating resource estimates to improve investment decisions.Min Proc Extractive Metall. 129(1):1–11.
10.
CoombesJ.2008. The Art and science of resource estimation. Subiaco, WA: Coombes CapabilitySage UK: London, England.
11.
DeutschCV, JournelAG.1998. GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University PressSage UK: London, England.
12.
DeutschJL, SzymanskiJ, DeutschCV.2014. Checks and measures of performance for kriging estimates.J S Afr I Min Metall J. 114:223–230.
13.
DukeJH, HannaPJ.2014. Geological interpretation for resource modelling and estimation. In: EdwardsAC, editor. Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation – The AusIMM guide to good practice. 2nd ed. Victoria: AusIMMSage UK: London, England; p. 145–153.
14.
EmeryX, OrtizJM.2005. Estimation of mineral resources using grade domains: critical analysis and a suggested methodology.J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 105:247–256.
15.
EmeryX.2004. On the consistency of the indirect lognormal correction.Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 18(4):258–264. doi:10.1007/s00477-004-0188-2.
16.
EmeryX.2008. Change of support for estimating local block grade distributions.Math Geosci. 40(6):671–688. doi:10.1007/s11004-008-9148.
17.
FonsecaCRAF, CostaJFCL, HundelshaussenRJR, BassaniMAA.2021. Kriging parameter optimisation: global versus local search strategies.Appl Earth Sci. 130(3):185–196.
18.
HaasTC.1990. Kriging and automated variogram modeling within a moving window.Atmospheric Environ Part A. Gen Top. 24(7):1759–1769. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(90)90508-K.
19.
HundelshaussenRJR, CostaJFCL, MarquesDM, BassaniMAA.2018. Localised kriging parameter optimisation based on absolute error minimization.Appl Earth Sci. 127(4):153–162.
20.
IsaaksHE, SrivastavaMR.1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford: Oxford University PressSage UK: London, England.
KrigeDG.1997. A practical analysis of the effects of spatial structure and of data available and accessed, on conditional biases in ordinary kriging. Geostatistics Wollongong 1996.5th international Geostatistics Congress.
23.
LajaunieC.2000. Introduction to the modelling of the support effect. In: PandalaiHS, SaraswatiPK, editors. Geological data analysis: statistical methods. New Delhi: Hindustan PublishingSage UK: London, England; p. 155–171.
24.
Machuca-MoryDF, DeutschCV.2013. Non-stationary geostatistical modeling based on distance weighted statistics and distributions.Math Geosci. 45(1):31–48. doi:10.1007/s11004-012-9428-z.
25.
MagneronC, JeanneeN, Le MoineO, BourilletJ-F.2010. Integrating prior knowledge and locally varying parameters with moving-GeoStatistics: methodology and application to bathymetric mapping. In: AtkinsonP, LloydC, editors. geoENV VII – geostatistics for environmental applications. Quantitative geology and geostatistics 16. Dordrecht: SpringerSage UK: London, England; p. 405–415. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2322-3_35.
26.
MatheronG.1963. Principles of geostatistics.Econ Geol. 58:1246–1266.
27.
MatheronG.1976. Forecasting block grade distributions: the transfer functions. In: GuarascioM, DavidM, HuijbregtsCJ, editors. Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry. Dordrecht: ReidelSage UK: London, England; p. 237–251.
28.
MatheronG.1984. The selectivity of the distributions and “The second principle of geostatistics”. In: VerlyG, DavidM, JournelAG, MarechalA, editors. Geostatistics for natural resources characterisation. Dordrecht: ReidelSage UK: London, England; p. 421–433.. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_24
29.
MatheronG.1985. Change of support for diffusion-type random functions.J Int Assoc Math Geol. 17(2):137–165. doi:10.1007/BF01033151.
30.
NowakM, LeuangthongO.2016. Conditional bias in kriging: let's keep it. geostatistics valencia 2016. quantitative geology and geostatistics 19. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International PublishingSage UK: London, England. p. 303–318.
31.
RivoirardJ.1987. Two key parameters when choosing the kriging neighbourhood.Math Geol. 19(8):851–856.
32.
RomaryT, RivoirardJ, DeraismeJ, QuinonesC, FreulonX.2012. Domaining by clustering multivariate geostatistical data. In: AbrahamsenP, HaugeR, KolbjørnsenO, editors. Proceedings of Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Dordrecht: Springer (Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 17); p. 455–466.
SinclairAJ, BlackwellGH.2002. Applied mineral inventory estimation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressSage UK: London, England.
35.
te StroetCBM, SnepvangersJJJC.2005. Mapping curvilinear structures with local anisotropy kriging.Math Geol. 37(6):635–649. doi:10.1007/s11004-005-7310-y.
36.
VannJ, JacksonS, BertoliO.2003. Quantitative kriging neighbourhood analysis for the mining geologist – A description of the method with worked case examples.Fifth International Mining Geology Conference. Bendigo, Victoria. p. 17–19.
37.
WildeBJ, DeutschCV.2012. Kriging and simulation in presence of stationary domains: developments in boundary modeling. In: AbrahamsenP, HaugeR, KolbjørnsenO, editors. Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative geology and geostatistics 17. Dordrecht: SpringerSage UK: London, England; p. 289–300. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_23
