Hazards in underground coal mines create an unsafe working environment for workers and equipment. This paper aims to analyze the safety risk in underground coal mining using an improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method. To achieve this, the causes of the main events that threaten the safety of the working environment were identified and discussed in a case study; Parvadeh Tabas coal mine, Iran. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to calculate the importance degree of each hazard. Then, the FMEA approach under the fuzzy environment was used for the safety risk analysis. Regarding the results of this study, the outburst-related hazards, failure to provide sufficient compressed air, and the electrical locomotive-related hazards have the highest level of safety risk. In this concept, it is possible to identify the leading causes of accidents and propose practical solutions to improve the safety conditions of the mine working places.
AghababaeiS, JalalifarH, SaeediG.2019. Prediction of face advance rate and determination of the operation efficiency in retreat longwall mining panel using rock engineering system. Int J Coal Sci Tech. 6 (3): 419 – 429.
2.
AlaviI.2014. Fuzzy AHP method for plant species selection in mine reclamation plans: case study sungun copper mine. Iran J Fuzzy Syst. 11 (5): 23 – 38.
3.
AmiriR, KretschmannJ, MartensPN, LangefeldO.2017. Sustainable strategic management of Sangan iron ore mines in Iran (No. RWTH-2017-01816). Fachgruppe für Rohstoffe und Entsorgungstechnik.
4.
BajićS, BajićD, GluščevićB, Ristić VakanjacV.2020. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to underground mining method selection. Symmetry (Basel). 12 (2): 192.
5.
BalarajuJ, RajMG, MurthyCS.2019. Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine – a case study. J Sust Min. 18 (4): 257 – 268.
6.
BlandJM, AltmanDG.1997. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. Br Med J. 314 (7080): 572.
7.
CanE.2019. Assessment of risks relevant to underground measurements for coal mining production and exploration. Nat Resour Res. 29 (3): 1773 – 1785.
8.
ChanamoolN, NaennaT.2016. Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl Soft Comput. 43: 441 – 453.
9.
ChongHT, CollieA.2022. The characteristics of accepted work-related injuries and diseases claims in the Australian coal mining industry. Saf Health Work.
10.
ChuC, JainR, MuradianN, ZhangG.2016. Statistical analysis of coal mining safety in China with reference to the impact of technology. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 116 (1): 73 – 78.
11.
DengY, SongL, ZhouZ, LiuP.2017. An approach for understanding and promoting coal mine safety by exploring coal mine risk network. Complexity, 2017: 1 – 17.
12.
EricsonCA.2005. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 13, pp. 235 – 259.
13.
FaZ, LiX.2021. From aggregate to part: study on the change of coal mine safety records in China under the intervention of risk pre-control management system. Resources Policy. 73: 102159.
14.
FarahbakhshE, PourjafariMJ, FaramarziL, EslamkishT.2016. Investigating the effect of fractures on unusual gas emission in coal mines; case study of Parvadeh coal mine, Iran. Int J Min Geo-Eng. 50 (2): 163 – 168.
15.
GangulyKK, GuinKK.2013. A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment. Benchmark Int J. 20 (1): 129 – 146.
16.
GuillaumeR, DuboisD.2020. A min-max regret approach to maximum likelihood inference under incomplete data. Int J Approx Reason. 121: 135 – 149.
17.
HarrisJ, KirschP, ShiM, LiJ, GagraniA, Anand KrishnaES, TabishA, AroraD, KothandaramanK, CliffD.2014. Comparative analysis of coal fatalities in Australia, South Africa, India, China and USA, 2006-2010. 14th coal operators’ conference. University of Wollongong, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy & Mine Managers Association of Australia, pp.399–407.
18.
HebblewhiteBK, MitraR, KirschP.2015. Use of risk management approaches for underground coal mining design, operations and accident investigations. 13th ISRM International congress of rock mechanics, May, OnePetro.
19.
HoseiniSA, FallahpourA, WongKY, MahdiyarA, SaberiM, DurdyevS.2021. Sustainable supplier selection in construction industry through hybrid fuzzy-based approaches. Sustainability. 13 (3): 1413.
20.
IancuI.2012. A Mamdani type fuzzy logic controller. In: Fuzzy logic-controls, concepts, theories and applications. London: IntechOpen Limited ; p. 325 – 350.
21.
IBM Corp. 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows.
22.
IpharM, CukurluozAK.2020. Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 26 (2): 256 – 271.
23.
Iran NSC. 2020. Islamic Republic of Iran, Presidential Administration, Department of Planning and Strategic Supervision, National Statistical Center of Iran. http://www.amar.org.ir/default.aspx
24.
IslamMZ, ChakrabortyP.2021. Importance of failure modes and effect analysis application for risk analysis in Barapukuria coal mine, Bangladesh. Int J Innov Eng Res Tech. 8 (5): 148 – 156.
25.
Jian-guoZ, Bai-quanL, YanZ, ChengZ.2012. Research of coal mine production safety and risk management system. 2012 2nd International Conference on consumer electronics, communications and networks (CECNet), IEEE, April; pp. 482–485.
26.
KahramanC, Kayaİ, ŞenvarÖ. 2013. Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 19 (2): 538 – 552.
27.
KrauseM.2017. Hazards and occupational risk in hard coal mines–a critical analysis of legal requirements. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP Publishing, November. 268(1), p. 012013.
28.
LiM, WangH, WangD, ShaoZ, HeS.2020. Risk assessment of gas explosion in coal mines based on fuzzy AHP and Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot. 135: 207 – 218.
29.
LiuHC, YouJX, LinQL, LiH.2015. Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Computer Integr Manuf. 28 (7): 701 – 714.
30.
LiuQ, DouF, MengX.2020. Building risk precontrol management systems for safety in China's underground coal mines. Resources Policy. 101631.
31.
MahdevariS, ShahriarK, EsfahanipourA.2014. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ. 488: 85 – 99.
32.
MarhavilasPK, KoulouriotisD, GemeniV.2011. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 24 (5): 477 – 523.
33.
MengX, LiuQ, LuoX, ZhouX.2019. Risk assessment of the unsafe behaviours of humans in fatal gas explosion accidents in China's underground coal mines. J Cleaner Prod. 210: 970 – 976.
34.
MikaeilR, JafarpourA, HoboubehA.2017. Safety risk analysis of dimensional stone quarried by diamond wire saws using FMEA method (case study: Badeki marble quarry-Ghareh-Ziaeddin). J Miner Resour Eng. 2 (1): 75 – 84.
35.
PaithankarA.2010. Hazard identification and risk analysis in mining industry. Doctoral dissertation. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.
36.
PanhwarS, MaharRB, AbroAA, IjazMW, SolangiGS, MuqeetM.2017. Health and safety assessment in lakhra coal mines and its mitigation measures. Iran J Health Saf Environ. 4 (3): 775 – 780.
37.
PattersonJM, ShappellSA.2010. Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accid Anal Prev. 42 (4): 1379 – 1385.
38.
PazandK.2015. Concentration and distribution of selenium in Iranian coals. Environ Nanotech Monit Manag. 3: 55 – 60.
39.
PourjavadE, ShahinA.2018. The application of Mamdani fuzzy inference system in evaluating green supply chain management performance. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 20 (3): 901 – 912.
40.
PrusekS, RajwaS, WranaA, KrzemieńA.2017. Assessment of roof fall risk in longwall coal mines. Int J Min Reclam Env. 31 (8): 558 – 574.
41.
QinC, ZhangY.2016. Evaluation of the safety of mine road based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J Transp Technol. 7 (1): 70 – 82.
42.
RubinM, GiacominiA, AllenR, TurnerR, KellyB.2020. Identifying safety culture and safety climate variables that predict reported risk-taking among Australian coal miners: An exploratory longitudinal study. Saf Sci. 123: 104564.
43.
SaatyTL.1990. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manage Sci. 36 (3): 259 – 268.
44.
SamantraC, DattaS, MahapatraSS.2017. A risk-based decision support framework for selection of appropriate safety measure system for underground coal mines. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 24 (1): 54 – 68.
45.
SariM, SelcukAS, KarpuzC, DuzgunHSB.2009. Stochastic modeling of accident risks associated with an underground coal mine in Turkey. Saf Sci. 47 (1): 78 – 87.
46.
SarkarB.2011. Fuzzy decision making and its applications in cotton fibre grading. In: Soft Computing in textile engineering. Woodhead Publishing ; p. 353 – 383.
47.
ShirmardH, BahroudiA, AdeliA.2015. Fuzzy AHP method in GIS for determining the optimal drilling points in the Naisian porphyry copper mine. Sci Res Quart Geogr Data (SEPEHR). 24 (93): 91 – 100.
48.
ShriwasM, PritchardC.2020. Workplace risk assessment and control of fires and explosions in underground coal mines. Int J Min Miner Eng. 11 (3): 228 – 239.
49.
SitorusF, Brito-ParadaPR.2020. Equipment selection in mineral processing – a sensitivity analysis approach for a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model. Miner Eng. 150: 106261.
50.
SongZ, ZhuH, JiaG, HeC.2014. Comprehensive evaluation on self-ignition risks of coal stockpiles using fuzzy AHP approaches. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 32: 78 – 94.
51.
SpanidisPM, RoumposC, PavloudakisF.2021. A fuzzy-AHP methodology for Planning the risk management of Natural hazards in surface mining projects. Sustainability. 13 (4): 2369.
52.
TongR, YangY, MaX, ZhangY, LiS, YangH.2019. Risk assessment of miners’ unsafe behaviors: a case study of gas explosion accidents in coal mine, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16 (10): 1765.
53.
TripathyDP, AlaCK.2018. Identification of safety hazards in Indian underground coal mines. J Sust Min. 17 (4): 175 – 183.
54.
WagnerC, MillerS, GaribaldiJM.2011. A fuzzy toolbox for the R programming language. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011), IEEE, June; p. 1185–1192.
55.
WangL, ChengYP, LiuHY.2014. An analysis of fatal gas accidents in Chinese coal mines. Saf Sci. 62: 107 – 113.
56.
WangQ, WangH, QiZ.2016. An application of nonlinear fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in safety evaluation of coal mine. Saf Sci. 86: 78 – 87.
57.
YagerRR, ZadehLA.2012. An introduction to fuzzy logic applications in intelligent systems (Vol. 165). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
58.
YangB, YuanJ, YeZ.2018. Risk assessment of coal mining above confined aquifer based on maximizing deviation in a GIS environment. Arab J Geosci. 11 (12): 1 – 10.
59.
YinW, FuG, YangC, JiangZ, ZhuK, GaoY.2017. Fatal gas explosion accidents on Chinese coal mines and the characteristics of unsafe behaviors: 2000–2014. Saf Sci. 92: 173 – 179.
60.
ZhangJ, FuJ, HaoH, FuG, NieF, ZhangW.2020. Root causes of coal mine accidents: characteristics of safety culture deficiencies based on accident statistics. Process Saf Environ Prot. 136: 78 – 91.
