In quarries, rock blasting is important for mining and transportation, being the first step in the comminution. Discontinuities present in a rock mass can interrupt the propagation of the shock wave and evacuate gases, thereby reducing the efficiency of the explosives. Differences in the orientation of joint sets and the advancing direction of the mine produce different fragmentation results. In this study, the blastability of a rock mass was evaluated as a function of mining advance direction relative to the direction of the main joint set using particle size curves generated by photo-analysis. The data were analysed for each bench, and the optimal direction of advance was determined as the one to generate the smallest boulders. The particle size curves reveal optimal fragmentation when the mining direction is orthogonal to the main joint set, reducing the number of boulders by 64.40%.
AkbariM, LashkaripourG, BafghiAY, GhafooriM.2015. Blastability evaluation for rock mass fragmentation in Iran central iron ore mines. Int J Min Sci Technol. 25 (1): 59 – 66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.11.008.
BergmannOR, WuFC, EdlJW.1974. Model rock blasting measures effect of delays and hole patterns on rock fragmentation. Eng Min J. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(74)90634-2.
CunninghamCVB.1983. The Kuz-Ram Model for Prediction of Fragmentation from Blasting. In Proceedings Lulea, Sweden.
6.
CunninghamCVB.1987. Fragmentation Estimations and the Kuz–Ram Model –Four Years On. In Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 475–487 . Keystone.
GheibieS, AghababaeiH, HoseinieSH, PourrahimianY.2009. Modified Kuz-Ram fragmentation model and its use at the sungun copper mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 46 (6): 967 – 973. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.003.
HamdiE, du MouzaJ.2005. A methodology for rock mass characterisation and classification to improve blast results. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 42 (2): 177 – 194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.07.005.
13.
HekmatA, MunozS, GomezR.2019. Prediction of Rock Fragmentation Based on a Modified Kuz-Ram Model. Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection – MPES 2018. Springer International Publishing; p. 69–79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99220-4_6.
14.
JimenoCL, JimenoEL, BermudezPG.2003. Manual de Perforación y Voladura de Rocas. Ingeopress. Madri: Instituto Tecnológico Geominero de España.
15.
KululaMI, NashongoMN, AkandeJM.2017. Influence of blasting parameters and density of rocks on blast Performance at Tschudi Mine, Tsumeb, Namibia. J Min Mate Charact Eng. 05 (06): 339 – 352. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2017.56028.
16.
KuznetsovVM.1973. The mean diameter of the fragments formed by blasting rock. Soviet Mining Science. doi: 10.1007/BF02506177.
17.
MioGD, GandolfiN.1995. Cartografia Geotécnica Da Região de Mogi-Guaçu, São Paulo. Revista Do Instituto Geológico16 (special). doi: 10.5935/0100-929X.19950018.
18.
MoraisJLd, GrippMdFA.2004. Fundamentos Para Simulação Dos Desmontes de Rocha Por Explosivos. Rem: Revista Escola de Minas. 57 (4): 241 – 248. doi: 10.1590/s0370-44672004000400005.
Nur LyanaK, HareyaniZ, Kamar ShahA, Mohd. HazizanMH.2016. “ Effect of geological condition on degree of fragmentation in a Simpang Pulai Marble quarry. Procedia Chem19: 694 – 701. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.072.
