When developing a process flowsheet, the risks in achieving positive financial outcomes are minimised by ensuring representative metallurgical samples and quality testwork. A case study is presented based on an underground gold operation, where poor metallurgical sampling led to grade and recovery underperformance. Sampling-related issues included: poor liaison between geologists and metallurgists; poor domaining; too few metallurgical samples collected and tested; unrepresentative sample composites and sub-samples; poor laboratory practice; and a lack of documentation and QAQC. These issues led to disruption over four years and are estimated to have cost around US$115M in lost revenue and US$7.5M in corrective expenditure. After an initial characterisation programme, a variability mini-bulk sampling and testwork phase was undertaken. This was followed by a pilot programme, progressing to trial mining and production. The paper emphasises the need for fit for purpose metallurgical sampling and testwork, and the early application of variability sampling.
AbzalovMZ.2008. Quality control of assay data: a review of procedures for measuring and monitoring precision and accuracy. Explore Min Geol. 3–4:131–144. doi: 10.2113/gsemg.17.3-4.131
2.
AndersonMA.2018. Planning the mineral processing plant. Mineral Property Evaluation: Handbook for Feasibility Studies and Due Diligence. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Englewood. p. 175–208.
3.
CarrascoPC, CarrascoP, JaraE.2004. The economic impact of incorrect sampling and analysis practices in the copper mining industry. Chemo Intel Lab Sys. 74:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.04.013
4.
CintraEC, SamboraJA, ViejasEP, BaragaR, MaiaGF.2007. Coarse gold sampling at Sao Francisco mine, Brazil. Proceedings of the World Conference on Sampling and Blending. Fundacao Luiz Englert, Porto Alegre. p. 187–197.
5.
ClarkI, DominySC.2017. Underground bulk sampling, uniform conditioning and conditional simulation – unrealistic expectations? Proceedings of the World Conference on Sampling and Blending. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 3–19.
6.
DominySC.2014a. Predicting the unpredictable – evaluating high-nugget effect gold deposits. Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation Guide to Good Practice. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 659–678.
7.
DominySC.2014b. Effects of sample mass on gravity recoverable gold test results in low-grade ores. App Earth Sci. 123:234–242. doi: 10.1179/1743275814Y.0000000061
8.
DominySC.2016. Importance of good sampling practice throughout the gold mine value chain. Min Tech. 125:129–141. doi: 10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000028
9.
DominySC, GlassHJ, O'ConnorL, LamCK, PurevgerelS, MinnittRCA.2018c. Integrating the Theory of Sampling into underground mine grade control strategies. Minerals. 8(232). DOI:10.3390/min8050232.
10.
DominySC, GlassHJ, O'ConnorL, LamCK, PurevgerelS.2019. Integrating the Theory of Sampling into underground mine grade control strategies: case studies from gold operations. Minerals. 9(238). DOI:10.3390/min9040238.
11.
DominySC, MurphyB, GrayAH.2011. Characterisation of gravity amenable gold ores – sample representivity and determinations methods. Proceedings of the Geometallurgy Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 281–292.
12.
DominySC, O'ConnorL, GlassHJ, PurevgerelS, XieY.2018a. Towards representative metallurgical sampling and recovery testwork programmes. Minerals. 8(193). DOI:10.3390/min8050193.
13.
DominySC, O'ConnorL, GlassHJ, XieY.2018b. Geometallurgical study of a gravity recoverable gold orebody. Minerals. 8(186). DOI:10.3390/min8050186.
14.
DominySC, O'ConnorL, Parbhakar-FoxA, GlassHJ, PurevgerelS.2018d. Geometallurgy – a route to more resilient mine operations. Minerals. 8(560). DOI:10.3390/min8120560.
15.
DominySC, PetersenJS.2005. Sampling coarse gold-bearing mineralisation – developing effective protocols and a case study from the Nalunaq mine, southern Greenland. Proceedings of the World Conference on Sampling and Blending. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 151–165.
16.
DominySC, PlattenIM, XieY.2008a. Bulk sampling of complex gold deposits: material characterisation and programme design and management. Proceedings of the Sampling Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 41–57.
17.
DominySC, PlattenIM, XieY.2010. Determining gold particle size in gravity ores for sampling and metallurgical characterisation – discussion and test protocol. Proceedings of the Gravity Gold Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 83–95.
18.
DominySC, XieY.2016. Optimising sampling protocols via the heterogeneity test: challenges in coarse gold mineralisation. Min Tech. 125:103–113. doi: 10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000011
19.
DominySC, XieY, PlattenIM.2008b. Gold particle characteristics in narrow vein deposits: implications for evaluation and metallurgy. Proceedings of the Narrow Vein Mining Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 91–104.
EhrigK, LiebezeitV, MacmillanE.2017. Metallurgical QAQC – who needs it? The Olympic Dam experience. Proceedings of the Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating Strategies. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 31–44.
22.
EhrigK, PitardFF.2017. Sampling the supergiant Olympic Dam iron-oxide Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, South Australia. Proceedings of the World Conference on Sampling and Blending. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 21–27.
23.
François-BongarçonDM.1998. Extensions to the demonstration of Gy's formula. Explor Min Geol. 7:149–154.
24.
François-BongarçonDM, GyPM.2002. The most common error in applying Gy's formula in the theory of mineral sampling and the history of the liberation factor. Journ S Afr Inst Min Metall. 102:475–479.
25.
GuresinN, LorenzenL, DominySC, MullerH, CooperA.2012. Sampling and testwork protocols for process plant design. Proceedings of the Sampling Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 95–107.
26.
GyPM.1982. Sampling of particulate materials: theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 431.
27.
GyPM.2004. Sampling of discrete materials – a new introduction to the theory of sampling I. Qualitative approach. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 74:7–24.
28.
HanksJ, BarrattD.2002. Sampling a mineral deposit for metallurgical testing and the design of comminution and mineral separation processes. Proceedings of the Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice and Control Conference. Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton. p. 99–116.
29.
JORC. 2012. Australasian code for reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves, The JORC Code. Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, December 2012. p. 44.
30.
KormosL, SliwinskiJ, OliveiraJ, HillG.2013. Geometallurgical characterisation and representative metallurgical sampling at Xstrata process support. Proceedings of the Annual Canadian Mineral Processors Operators Conference. CIM, Montreal. p. 3–14.
31.
LaplanteAR, SpillerDE.2002. Bench-scale and pilot plant testwork for gravity concentration circuit design. Proceedings of the Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice and Control Conference. Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton. p. 160–175.
32.
LaplanteAR, StauntonWP.2005. Gravity recovery of gold – an overview of recent developments. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors. Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Montreal. p. 51–64.
33.
LaplanteAR, WoodcockFC, HuangL.2001. A laboratory procedure to characterise gravity recoverable gold. SME Transactions. 308:53–59.
34.
LawrieD, StanleyCR.2012. Average relative error in geochemical determinations: clarification, calculations and a plea for consistency. Proceedings of the Sampling Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 181–183.
35.
LymanGJ, BourgeoisFS.2017. Sampling, corporate governance and risk analysis. We are metallurgists not magicians: landmark papers by practicing metallurgists. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 349–354.
36.
McCarthyPL.2003. Managing technical risk for mine feasibility studies. Proceedings of the Mining Risk Management Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. p. 21–27.
37.
MinnittRCA.2007. Sampling: the impact on costs and decision making. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 107:451–462.
38.
NI43-101. 2011. National instrument 43-101: standards of disclosure for mineral projects. Canadian Securities Administrators. p. 44.
39.
PitardFF.2013. Guidelines for acceptable allotted sampling uncertainty. Proceedings of the World Conference on Sampling and Blending. Gecamin. Santiago. p. 89–98.
40.
PitardFF.2015. The advantages and pitfalls of conventional heterogeneity tests and a suggest alternative. TOS Forum. 5:13–18.
41.
PitardFF.2019. Theory of Sampling and Sampling Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 694.
42.
RenduJ-M.2017. Risk management in evaluating mineral deposits. Englewood: Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration. p. 310.
StanleyCR, SmeeBW.2007. Strategies for reducing sampling errors in exploration and resource definition drilling programmes for gold deposits. Geochem Explor Environ Anal. 7:329–340. doi: 10.1144/1467-7873/07-128
45.
WilliamsSR.2012. Metallurgy and geometallurgy – what's the difference. SEG Newsletter. 88:30–31.
46.
WilliamsSr, OunpuuMO, SarbuttKW.2002. Bench and pilot plant programs for flotation circuit design. Proceedings of the Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice and Control Conference. Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton. p. 145–159.
