This study shows the feasibility of recovering copper directly from Pregnant Leaching Solutions (PLS), using the reactive electrodialysis technique, without the need of solvent extraction. The copper PLS contained the following ion concentrations: Cu2+ 2.0–2.5 g/L; pH 1.5–1.8;
90–95 g/L; Cl− 8–10 g/L and total iron of 8–10 g/L. The copper electrowinning process is limited by the mass transport capacity of the system and by impurities that decrease the yield. To increase the selectivity and the copperproduction rate, a reactive electrodialysis (RED) cell was developed. The cell contained four compartments, two anion-exchangemembranes and a bipolar electrode to increase the production rate. This cell recovered copper and sulfuric acid at the anolytes. Thebest result was a current efficiency of 99% and specific energy consumption of 2.11 Wh/kg Cu using a current density of 80 A/m2 at 55°C and flow of 100 mL/s.
AsghariM, VandGhorbanyO, NakhaeiF.2019. Relationship among operational parameters, ore characteristics, and product shape properties in an industrial SAG mill. Part Sci Technol. 38:1–11.
2.
BakerR. W.2004. Ion exchange membrane processes - electrodialysis. In: Membrane technology and applications. s.l.: John Wiley & Sons; p. 393–422.
3.
Britto-CostaPH, RuotoloLAM.2011. Electrochemical removal of copper ions from aqueous solutions using a modulated current method. Sep Sci Technol. 46(7):1205–1211.
4.
CalvoG, MuddG, ValeroA, ValeroA.2016. Decreasing ore grades in global metallic mining: a theoretical issue or a global reality?Resources. 5(36):1–14.
5.
ForsénO, AromaaJ, LundströmM.2017. Primary copper smelter and refinery as a recycling plant—a system integrated approach to estimate secondary raw material tolerance. Recycling. 2: 19.
6.
GentinaJC, AcevedoF.2016. Copper bioleaching in Chile. Minerals. 6: 23.
7.
GhorbaniY, How KuanS.2017. A review of sustainable development in the Chilean mining sector: past, present and future. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 31(2):137–165.
8.
HannulaP, KhalidMK, JanasD, YliniemiK, LundströmM.2019. Energy efficient copper electrowinning and direct deposition on carbon nanotube film from industrial wastewaters. J Cleaner Prod. 207:1033–1039.
9.
HernándezJ, RuizD.2021. Removal of chloride ions from a copper leaching solution, using electrodialysis, to improve the uranium extraction through ion-exchange. J Hazard Mater. 420:126582.
10.
JamesPI, BakerM.2015. Profitable copper production from low-grade waste ores. Min Eng. 67(4):61–67.
11.
KalliomäkiT, WilsonBP, AromaaJ, LundströmM.2019. Diffusion coefficient of cupric ion in a copper electrorefining electrolyte containing nickel and arsenic. Miner Eng. 134:381–389.
12.
LottermoserB. G.2007. Introduction to mine wastes. In: Mine wastes: characterization, treatment, environmental impacts. Berlin: Springer; p. 1–29.
13.
MahmoudiH.2015. Water desalination in electrodialysis applications. In: DrioliE., GiornoL, editors. Encyclopedia of membranes. Berlin: Springer; p. 1–2.
14.
MargarellaAM, PerrineKA, LewisT, FaubelM, WinterB, and HemmingerJC.2013. Dissociation of sulfuric acid in aqueous solution: determination of the photoelectron spectral fingerprints of H2SO4, HSO4–, and SO42– in water. J Phys Chem C. 117(16):8131–8137.
15.
NikonenkoV, PismenskayaND, BelovaEI, SistatP, HuguetP, PourcellyG, LarchetC.2010. Intensive current transfer in membrane systems: modelling, mechanisms and application in electrodialysis. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 160:101–123.
16.
OchromowiczK, ChmielewskiT.2013. Solvent extraction of copper(II) from concentrated leach liquors. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 49(1):357–367.
17.
OliveH, LacosteG.1979. Application of volumetric electrodes to the recuperation of metals in industrial effluents—I. mass transfer in fixed beds of spherical conductive par. Electrochim Acta. 24(10):1109–1114.
18.
PérezK, ToroN, GálvezE, RoblesP, WilsonR, NavarraA.2021. Environmental, economic and technological factors affecting Chilean copper smelters – a critical review. J Mater Res Technol. 15:213–225.
19.
PriceDC, DavenportWG.1980. Densities, electrical conductivities and viscosities of CuSO4/H2SO4 solutions in the range of modern electrorefining and electrowinning electrolytes. Metall Trans B. 11:159–163.
20.
RobinsonT, SandovalS, CookP.2003. World copper solvent extraction plants: practices and design. JOM. 55:24–26.
21.
RuotoloL, GubulinJ.2002. Electrodeposition of copper ions on fixed bed electrodes: kinetic and hydrodynamic study. Braz J Chem Eng. 19(1):105–118.
22.
SavovG, GrigorovaI, AngelovT, NishkovI.2012. Combination of ion exchange and solvent extraction versus solvent extraction, a technical–economical comparison. New Delhi: s.n.
23.
SimonsR.1985. Water splitting in ion exchange membranes. Electrochim Acta. 30(3):275–282.
24.
SoleK, TinklerO.2016. Copper solvent extraction: status, operating practices, and challenges in the African copperbelt. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 116:553–560.
25.
ZengW, WangS, FreeML, TangC-J, XiaoR, LiangY.2018. Design and modeling of an innovative copper electrolytic cell. J Electrochem Soc. 165(14):E798–E807.
90–95 g/L; Cl− 8–10 g/L and total iron of 8–10 g/L. The copper electrowinning process is limited by the mass transport capacity of the system and by impurities that decrease the yield. To increase the selectivity and the copperproduction rate, a reactive electrodialysis (RED) cell was developed. The cell contained four compartments, two anion-exchangemembranes and a bipolar electrode to increase the production rate. This cell recovered copper and sulfuric acid at the anolytes. Thebest result was a current efficiency of 99% and specific energy consumption of 2.11 Wh/kg Cu using a current density of 80 A/m2 at 55°C and flow of 100 mL/s.