Gangue rejection, resulting in an increased head grade at a higher net throughput (or, smaller plant footprint), and the creation of dual products, eg high grade and low grade, for alternative processing streams are two treatment options being investigated to turn otherwise uneconomic ores into reserves. Eleven gold ores have now been assessed for their potential for rejection of gangue by gravity separation using the gangue rejection amenability test (GRAT). The samples represent a variety of gold ore types, from several continents and gold producers. Additionally, two ores have been processed using four different crushing modes to characterise the influence of crush-type on liberation. The resulting GRAT database can be used for benchmarking and to determine the optimal gold loss vs mass rejected response for each ore given the influence of elemental deportment as a function of size and density based separation.
AckermanPK, HarrisGH, KlimpelRR, AplanFF.1987. Evaluation of flotation collectors for copper sulfides and pyrite, I. Common sulfhydryl collectors. Int J Miner Process. 21:105–127. doi: 10.1016/0301-7516(87)90009-3
2.
AktaşZ, KaracanF, OlcayA.1998. Centrifugal float–sink separation of fine Turkish coals in dense media. Fuel Process Technol. 55:235–250. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3820(98)00053-8
3.
BacchuwarSS.2018. X-ray computed tomography for analysis of gangue rejection in gravity preconcentration of low grade sulfide ores [Master of Science]. The University of Utah.
4.
BacchuwarSS, MkandawireNP, McGrathTDH, LinCL, MillerJD.2019. X-ray computed tomography for 3D analysis of gangue mineral rejection by gravity preconcentration of sulfidic gold ores. In review, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Special Edition.
5.
BallantyneGR, PowellMS.2014. Benchmarking comminution energy consumption for the processing of copper and gold ores. Miner Eng. 65:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.05.017
6.
BodeP, McgrathTDH, EksteenJJ.2019. Characterising the effect of different modes of particle breakage on coarse gangue rejection for an orogenic gold ore. In review, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, Special Edition.
7.
CarrascoC, KeeneyL, Napier-MunnTJ.2016. Methodology to develop a coarse liberation model based on preferential grade by size responses. Miner Eng. 86:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.12.013
8.
CarrascoC, KeeneyL, WaltersSG.2016. Development of a novel methodology to characterise preferential grade by size deportment and its operational significance. Miner Eng. 91:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.08.013
9.
EksteenJJ.2015. AMIRA p420e. ReportPP, editor. Perth (Australia): Curtin University, Western Australian School of Mines.
10.
HedleyN, TabachhnickH.1968. Chemistry of cyanidation. Wayne, NJ, USA: American Cyanamid Company. Mineral Dressing Notes No. 23.
11.
McGrathTDH, EksteenJJ, BaxAR, MillerJD, WaltersP, McgrathJL, LowesC, MkandawireNP, BodeP, Torres PereaL.2018. Theme 2: crushing, liberation & preconcentration of gold ores - project update May 2018. Perth, Australia: Curtin University, Western Australian School of Mines. AMIRA Project P420F.
12.
McGrathTDH, EksteenJJ, BodeP.2018. Assessing the amenability of a free milling gold ore to coarse particle gangue rejection. Miner Eng. 120:110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.02.009
13.
McGrathTDH, McGrathJL, EksteenJJ.2017. Theme 2: crushing, liberation & preconcentration of gold ores - project update. Perth, Australia: Curtin University, Western Australian School of Mines. AMIRA Project P420F.
14.
McGrathTDH, McGrathJL, EksteenJJ, BaxAR, LowesC, MkandawireNP, BodeP, WaltersP.2018. Theme 2: gangue rejection updates. Perth, Australia: Curtin University, Western Australian School of Mines. AMIRA P420 Project - Gold Processing Technology.
15.
PhillipsGN, HughesMJ.1996. The geology and gold deposits of the Victorian gold province. Ore Geol Rev. 11:255–302. doi: 10.1016/S0169-1368(96)00006-6
16.
ShiF, ZuoW, ManlapigE.2015. Pre-concentration of copper ores by high voltage pulses. Part 2: opportunities and challenges. Miner Eng. 79:315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.01.014
17.
SmitF, CoetzeeV, SeymourM, NotnagelS.2012. Preconcentration of UG2 platinum ore: economic benefits to mine, plant and smelter. Platinum 2012 Sun City, South Africa, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
18.
WangY, ForssbergE.2007. Enhancement of energy efficiency for mechanical production of fine and ultra-fine particles in comminution. China Particuo. 5:193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cpart.2007.04.003
19.
Wardell-JohnsonG, McGrathTDH, EksteenJJ.2016. Preconcentration report: Gekko database analysis and ballarat ore characterisation. Perth, Australia: Curtin University, Western Australian School of Mines. AMIRA Project P420E.
