Anthropogenic climate change, caused by the uncontrolled emission of greenhouse gases, is perhaps the greatest global challenge facing humanity. Psychology is the science of behaviour, so it takes on the task of studying and proposing coping strategies with regard to CC. Two strategies are possible: to mitigate the consequences of CC; and to adapt to those consequences. This article summarizes the main findings of psycho-environmental research related to psychological and situational predictors of coping responses to CC. It reviews the role of cognitive-rational determinants, affective-emotional factors, behavioural capabilities, personality traits and situational factors that facilitate mitigation and adaptive actions to CC. The paper concludes by discussing the role that psychology could play in global CC coping strategies, recognizing that there is a need to increase interest within the psychology community in the pressing problems of climate change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamseW.MattiesE. (2012). Informational strategies to promote proenvironmental behaviours; changing knowledge, awareness, and attitudes. In StegL.Van Den BergA.De GrootJ. (Eds.), Environmental psychology, an introduction (pp. 223–232). Wiley.
2.
AllóM.LoureiroM. (2014). The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 73(C), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.042
BarreraL.CorralV.FraijoB.TapiaC. (2018). Psychological and physical indicators of a transcendental positive environment and its impact on sustainable behavior. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 26(1), 51–68.
5.
BarrosH.PinheiroJ. (2020). Climate change perception by adolescents: Reflections on sustainable lifestyle, local impacts and optimism bias. PsyEcology, 11(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2020.1728654
6.
BloodhartB.SwimJ. K. (2010). Equality, harmony, and the environment: An ecofeminist approach to understanding the role of cultural values on the treatment of women and nature. Ecopsychology, 2(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0057
7.
BloomquistK. L.MachilaR. (2009). God, creation and climate change. The Lutheran World Federation.
8.
BonnesM.CarrusG.CorralV.PassafaroP. (2010). The socio-psychological affinity towards diversity: From biodiversity to socio-ecological sustainability. In CorralV.GarcíaC.FríasM. (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability (pp. 125–140). Nova Science Publishers.
9.
BrinkE.WamslerC. (2019). Citizen engagement in climate adaptation surveyed: The role of values, worldviews, gender and place. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1342–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.164
10.
BroomellS.BudescuD.PorH. (2015). Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Global Environmental Change, 32, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001
11.
BrownB. B.WernerC. M. (2012). Healthy physical environment and eating: Environmental supports for health. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 459–484). Oxford University Press.
12.
BrügerA.MortonT.DessaiS. (2015). Hand in hand: Public endorsement of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Plos One, 10(4), e0124843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124843
13.
BustosM. (2004). Modelo de conducta proambiental para el estudio de la conservación del agua potable [Doctoral Dissertation]. Facultad de Psicología, UNAM.
CapstickS.WhitmarshL.PoortingaW.PidgeonN.UphamP. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.321
CorralV.BonnesM.TapiaC.FraijoB.FríasM.CarrusG. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.001
19.
CorralV.CasoJ.FríasM. (2017). Psicología del Cambio Climático. Pearson.
20.
CorralV.CasoJ.TapiaC.FríasM. (2017). Consideration of immediate and future consequences in accepting and responding to anthropogenic climate change. Psychology, 8(10), 1519–1531. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.810101
21.
CorralV.PatoC.Torres-SotoN. (press). Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9
CorralV.TapiaC.OrtizA. (2015). On the relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment & Behavior, 47(8), 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514530718
24.
CunsoloA.EllisN. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2
DohertyT. J.ClaytonS. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023141
EwingR.CerveroR. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
30.
FraijoB.TapiaC.CorralV. (2014). Designing environmental education programs: Modeling pro-environmental competency. In AppletonJ. (Ed.), Values in sustainable development (pp. 244–254). Routledge.
GalwayL. P.BeeryT.Jones-CaseyK.TasalaK. (2019). Mapping the solastalgia literature: A scoping review study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152662
33.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction. Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
GuillardM.NavarroO.Fleury-BahiG. (2019). Flooding experience and assessment of climate change: Implication of psychological distance, risk perception and place attachment. Psyecology, 10(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1622347
36.
Haluza-DelayR. (2014). Religion and climate change: Varieties in viewpoints and practices. WIREs Climate Change, 5(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.268
37.
HeathY.GiffordR. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment & Behavior, 38(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277998
38.
HidalgoM. C.PisanoI. (2010). Determinants of risk perception and willingness to tackle climate change. A pilot study. Psyecology, 1(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119710790709595
39.
HigdeE.OztekinC.SahinE. (2017). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ awareness, beliefs, values, and behaviours pertinent to climate change. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1330040
40.
HoughtonJ. (2009). Global warming: The complete briefing. Cambridge University Press.
41.
HowellR.AllenS. (2017). People and planet: Values, motivations and formative influences of individuals acting to mitigate climate change. Environmental Values, 26(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14847335385436
42.
HuqS.ReidH. (2004). Mainstreaming adaptation in development. Institute for Development Studies Bulletin, 35, 15–21.
43.
IPCC (2013). Technical Summary. In T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
44.
JoreimanJ. A.Van LangeP. A.Van VugtM.WoodM.Vander LeestT.LambertC. (2001). Structural solutions to social dilemmas: A field study of commuters’ willingness to fund improvements in public transit. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02053.x
45.
JorgensonS. N.StephensJ. C.WhiteB. (2019). Environmental education in transition: A critical review of recent research on climate change and energy education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604478
46.
KaiserF. G.HartigT.BrüggerA.DuvierC. (2013). Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell paradigm. Environment & Behavior, 45(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511422444
47.
KlöcknerC. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
48.
KwonS. A.KimS.LeeJ. E. (2019). Analyzing the determinants of individual action on climate change by specifying the roles of six values in South Korea. Sustainability, 11(7), 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071834
49.
LegerM.PruneauD. (2012). Changing family habits: A case study into climate change mitigation behavior in families. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 2(2), 77–87. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057557.pdf
LeiserowitzA.SmithN.MarlonJ. R. (2010). Americans’ knowledge of climate change. Yale University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
52.
LópezJ.QuijanoG.SouzaT.EstradaJ.LebreroR.MuñozR. (2013). Biotechnologies for greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, and CO2) abatement: State of the art and challenges. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(6), 2277–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4734-z
MarkowitzE.GoldbergL.AshtonM.LeeK. (2012). Profiling the ‘proenvironmental individual’: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x
55.
MasudM.Al-AminA.JunshengH.AhmedF.YahayaS. R.AkhtarR.BannaH. (2016). Climate change issue and theory of planned behaviour: Relationship by empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.080
56.
MayerF.FrantzC. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
57.
Meira-CarteaP. A.González-GaudianoE.Gutiérrez-PérezJ. (2018). Climate crisis and the demand for more empiric research in social sciences: Emerging topics and challenges in environmental psychology. Psyecology, 9(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2018.1493775
58.
MilfontT. L.SibleyC. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006
59.
NguyenT. P. L.SeddaiuG.RoggeroP. P. (2019). Declarative or procedural knowledge? Knowledge for enhancing farmers’ mitigation and adaptation behaviour to climate change. Journal of Rural Studies, 67, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.005
60.
NielsenK. S.ClaytonS.SternP. C.DietzT.CapstickS.WhitmarshL. (2020). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624
61.
NordhausW. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991–2014. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991
62.
PearsonA. R.SchuldtJ. P.Romero-CanyasR. (2016). Social climate science: A new vista for psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616639726
63.
PinheiroJ.CorralV. (2010). Time perspective and sustainable behavior. In CorralV.GarcíaC.FríasM. (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability (pp. 205–224). Nova Science Publishers.
64.
PoškusM. S.Žukauskiene˙R. (2017). Predicting adolescents’ recycling behavior among different big five personality types. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.003
65.
RafteryA. E.ZimmerA.FriersonD. M.StartzR.LiuP. (2017). Less than 2 °C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nature Climate Change, 7(9), 637–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3352
66.
RaynerS.MaloneE. (1998). Why study human choice and climate change? In RaynerS.MaloneE. (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: An international assessment (pp. 4–33). Battelle Press.
67.
ReyG. (2020). Competencias adaptativas ante el cambio climático: un estudio con personas de Hermosillo y La Habana [Master’s Thesis]. Posgrado en Psicología, Universidad de Sonora.
68.
RisselC. (2009). Active travel: A climate change mitigation strategy with co-benefits for health. NSW Public Health Bulletin, 20(2), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB08043
69.
RoczenN.KaiserF.BognerF.WilsonM. (2013). A competence model for environmental education. Environment & Behavior, 46(8), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
70.
RosenA. M. (2015). The wrong solution at the right time: The failure of the kyoto protocol on climate change. Politics & Policy, 43(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12105
71.
SmitB.BurtonI.KleinR.StreetR. (1999). The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4(3/4), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009652531101
SoutterA. R. B.BatesT. C.MõttusR. (2020). Big five and HEXACO personality traits, proenvironmental attitudes, and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620903019
74.
SternP. C. (2020). A reexamination on how behavioral interventions can promote household action to limit climate change. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14653-x
75.
SwartR.BiesbroekR.BinnerupS.CarterT.CowanC.HenrichsT.LoquenS.MelaH.MorecroftM.ReeseM.ReyD. (2009). Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing national adaption strategies. Partnership for European Environmental Research.
76.
SwimJ.ClaytonS.HowardG. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change. Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023472
77.
TasquierG.PongiglioneF. (2017). The influence of causal knowledge on the willingness to change attitude towards climate change: Results from an empirical study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1846–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1355078
WhitmarshL. (2009). Behavioral responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003
80.
WolfJ.MoserS. (2011). Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world. WIREs: Climate Change, 2(4), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.120
81.
WyattT.BrismanA. (2017). The role of denial in the ‘theft of nature’: Comparing biopiracy and climate change. Critical Criminology, 25(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016-9344-5
82.
ZhangL.Ruiz-MenjivarJ.LuoB.LiangZ.SwisherM. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408
83.
ZimbardoP.BoydJ. (2008). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
