Benavente (Portugal) is a small town which, compared to the rest of the country, has higher levels of the following three types of risks: earthquakes (natural risk), criminality (social risk) and the running of the bulls (cultural risk). This has allowed us to explore spatial bias, i.e., whether people have lower perceptions of risk at the local level than at the national or international levels, or if there are any risks strongly related with the local culture that show a different pattern. We also test whether risk perception dimensions identified by a psychometric paradigm relate to the three risk types that are highly prevalent in Benavente. The results support the spatial bias in relation to earthquakes and criminality but reveal a reverse pattern regarding the running of the bulls (cultural risk). The results also showed that people scored higher on the Dread dimension for earthquakes, followed by criminality, with lower scores in regard to the running of the bulls. The opposite was verified regarding the Control dimension.
AzevedoA. R. (1981). Benavente – Estudo histórico-descritivo. Câmara Municipal de Benavente.
3.
BernardoF. (2013). Impact of place attachment on risk perception: Exploring the multidimensionality of risk and the scale of risk. Estudios de Psicologia, 34(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913808349253
4.
BernardoF.Palma-OliveiraJ. M. (2016). Urban neighborhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 239–251https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.010
5.
BilligM. (2006). Is my home my castle? Place attachment, risk perception, and religious faith. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277608
6.
BirdD. K.GísladóttirG.Dominey-HowesD. (2010). Volcanic risk and tourism in southern Iceland: Implications for hazard, risk and emergency response education and training. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 189(1–2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.09.020
7.
BonaiutoM.AlvesS.De DominicisS.PetruccelliI. (2016). Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research and agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007
8.
BrooksD. J. (2003). Public street surveillance: A psychometric study on the perceived social risk. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/114
9.
BurgerJ.PalmerM. (1992). Changes in and generalization of unrealistic optimism following experiences with stressful events: Reactions to the 1989 California earthquake. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 18(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181006
10.
BurninghamK.ThrushD. (2004). Pollution concerns in context: A comparison of local perceptions of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory. Journal of Risk Research, 7(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000158721
11.
Devine-WrightP.HowesY. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008
12.
DonovanA.AyalaI. A.EiserJ. R.SparksR. S. J. (2018). Risk perception at a persistently active volcano: Warnings and trust at Popocatéptel volcano in Mexico, 2012–2014. Bulletin of Volcanology, 80(47), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1218-0
13.
DonovanK.SuryantoA.UtamiP. (2012). Mapping cultural vulnerability in volcanic regions: The practical application of social volcanology at Mt Merapi, Indonesia. Environmental Hazards, 11(4), 303e323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.689252
14.
DouglasM.WildavskyA. B. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
15.
FischhoffB.SlovicP.LichtensteinS.ReadS.CombsB. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
16.
GallinaM.WilliamsA. (2014). Perceptions of air quality and sense of place among women in Northeast Canada Hamilton. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(3), 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v2i3.412
17.
GiffordR.ScannellL.KormosC.SmolovaC.BielA.BoncuS.CorralV.GüntherfH.HanyuK.HineD.KaiserF. G.KorpelaK.LimaL. M.MertigA. G.MiraR. G.MoserG.PassafaroP.PinheiroJ. Q.SainiS.SakoT.UzzelD. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
18.
GreenbergM. (2009). Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3242–3249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020
19.
Helweg-LarsenM. (1999). The lack of optimistic bias in response to the Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BA210204
20.
HenrichL.McClureJ.DoyleE. E. H. (2018). Perceptions of risk characteristics of earthquakes compared to other hazards and their impact on risk tolerance. Disasters, 42(4), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12284
21.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.HessS. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
22.
Instituto nacional de estatística. (2015a). Anuário estatístico da região do Alentejo. INE.
23.
Instituto nacional de estatística. (2015b). Anuário estatístico da área metropolitana de Lisboa. INE.
24.
JacksonJ. (2011). Revisiting sensitivity to risk in the fear of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(4), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810395146
25.
LaiL. Y.SaidI.KubotaA. (2013). The role of cultural spaces in Malaysia’s historic towns: The case of Kuala Dungun and Taiping. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 602–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.389
26.
LimaM. L.CastroP. (2005). Cultural theory meets community: Worldviews and local issues. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.004
27.
LimaM. L.MarquesS. (2005). Towards successful social impact assessment follow-up: A case study of psychosocial monitoring of a solid waste incinerator in the north of Portugal. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765553
28.
LuísS.PinhoL.LimaM. L.Roseta-PalmaC.MartinsF. C.de AlmeidaA. B. (2015). Is it all about awareness? The normalization of coastal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 19(6), 810–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1042507
MilfontT. L.AbrahamseW.McCarthyM. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 56–67. https://www.researchgate.net
32.
ParkhillK. A.PidgeonN. F.HenwoodK. L.SimmonsP.VenablesD. (2010). From the familiar to the extraordinary: Local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00364.x
33.
PenaJ. O. A.NunesJ. A. C.CarrilhoF. J. R. (2014). Catálogo sísmico de Portugal Continental e Região Adjacente para o Período 1961–1969. Instituto português do mar e da terra.
34.
PlappT.WernerU. (2006). Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: Examples from Germany. In AmmannW. J.DannenmannS.VuillietL. (Eds.), Risk21- Coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21st century (pp. 101–108). Taylor & Francis.
SchultzP. W.MilfontT.ChanceR. C.TronuG.LuisS.AndoK.GouveiaV. V. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46(3), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512458579
SlovicP. (2010). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. Routledge.
39.
SlovicP.FischhoffB.LichtensteinS. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In KatesR. W.HohenemserC.KaspersonJ. X. (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 91–125). Westview.
40.
StainH. J.KellyB.CarrW. J.LewinT. J.FitzgeraldM.FragarL. (2011). The psychological impact of chronic environmental adversity: Responding to prolonged drought. Social Science & Medicine, 73(11), 1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsocscimed.2011.09.016
41.
TrumboC.LueckM.MarlattH.PeekL. (2011). The effect of proximity to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on subsequent Hurricane outlook and optimistic bias. Risk Analysis, 31(12), 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01633.x
42.
TrumbroC.MeyerM. A.MarlattH.PeekL.MorrisseyB. (2014). An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for Hurricanes among gulf coast residents. Risk Analysis, 34(6), 1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12149
43.
TurnerJ. C.OnoratoR. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorizing perspective. In TylerT. R.KramerR. M.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Applied social research. The psychology of the social self (pp. 11–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
UzzelD. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0175
46.
VenablesD.PidgeonN. F.ParkhillK. A.HenwoodK. L.SimmonsP. (2012). Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003
ZhangY.ZhangH.-L.ZhangJ.ChengS. (2014). Predicting residents’ proenvironmental behaviors at tourist sites: The role of awareness of disaster’s consequences, values, and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.001
