Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-05
The effects of emotions on the generation of environmental arguments / Efectos de las emociones en la generación de argumentos sobre el medio ambiente natural
This paper analyses the effects of inducing emotions on thought-action repertoires related to nature following the Broaden-and-Build Theory (BBT). Based on a pilot study conducted with 279 university students, this study transculturally validated five videos that generated two positive, one neutral and two negative emotions. The main study, conducted with 300 Spanish university students, utilized experimental manipulation to ascertain whether videos that induced positive emotions increased the number of thought-action repertoires in comparison with the video that induced a neutral emotion. In the case of the negative videos, a significant discrepancy was observed in the number of repertoires generated depending on the type of emotion induced, with sadness generating a greater number than disgust. Furthermore, attitudes pertaining to affective bonds with nature increased thought-action repertoires, regardless of the emotion induced. The paper discusses the need to examine in greater depth the effect of different negative emotions on the generation of environmental arguments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aguilar-LuzónM. C.Calvo-SalgueroA.SalinasJ. M. (2014). Beliefs and environmental behavior: The moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 619–629. doi:10.1111/sjop.12160
2.
AmérigoM.AragonésJ. I.GarcíaJ. A. (2012). Explorando las dimensiones de la preocupación ambiental. Una propuesta integradora. Psyecology, 3, 299–311. doi:10.1174/217119712802845705
3.
AmérigoM.GarcíaJ. A.SánchezT. (2013). Actitudes y comportamiento hacia el medio ambiente natural. Salud medioambiental y bienestar emocional. Universitas Psychologica, 12, 845–856. doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy12-3.acma
4.
BeattieG.SaleL.McguireL. (2011). An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change?Semiotica, 187, 105–125. doi:10.1515/semi.2011.066
5.
BerenguerJ. (2007). The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 269–283. doi:10.1177/0013916506292937
6.
BerenguerJ. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 46, 110–114. doi:10.1177/0013916508325892
7.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
8.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.). Identity and the natural environment. The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
9.
Corral-VerdugoV. (2012a). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 651–666. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8
10.
Corral-VerdugoV. (2012b). Sustentabilidad y Psicología Positiva. Una Visión Optimista de las Conductas Proambientales y Prosociales. México DF, México: Manual Moderno.
11.
DamasioA. (2005). En busca de Spinoza [Looking for Spinoza]. Barcelona: Crítica.
12.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.AncoliS. (1980). Facial sings of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1124–1134. doi:10.1037/h0077722
13.
FernándezC.PascualJ. C.SolerJ.GarcíaE. (2011). Validación española de una batería de películas para inducir emociones. Psicothema, 23, 778–785. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=3956
14.
Fernández-BerrocalP.ExtremeraN.RamosN. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychological Reports, 94, 751–755. doi:10.2466/pr0.94.3.751-755
15.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
16.
FredricksonB. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1–53. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2
17.
FredricksonB. L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertories. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313–332. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238
18.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
19.
KuhnM. H.McPartlandT. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76. doi:10.2307/2088175
20.
LuqueT.IbáñezJ. A. (2012). Análisis de la varianza. In LuqueT. (Coord.), Técnicas de Análisis de Datos en Investigación de Mercados (pp. 311–376). Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
21.
PerkinsH. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 455–463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
22.
SandinB.ChorotP.LostaoL.JoinerT. E.SantedM. A.ValienteR. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37–51. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=229
23.
SchaeferA.NilsF.SanchezX.PhilippotP. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1153–1172. doi:10.1080/02699930903274322
24.
SchultzP. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174
25.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In SchmuckP.SchultzP. W. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
SevillanoV.AragonésJ. I.SchultzW. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39, 685–705. doi:10.1177/0013916506292334
27.
ViningJ.EbreoA. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. In BechtelR.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541–558). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
ZelenskiJ. M.NisbetE. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46, 3–23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901
29.
ZhangJ.PiffP.IyerbR.KolevaS.KeltnerD. (2014). An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.008
