Pro-environmental motivation and regulation to respect environmental laws as predictors of illegal anti-environmental behaviour / La motivación pro-ambiental y la motivación para respetar las leyes medioambientales como predictoras de la conducta anti-ecológica ilegal
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2017
Pro-environmental motivation and regulation to respect environmental laws as predictors of illegal anti-environmental behaviour / La motivación pro-ambiental y la motivación para respetar las leyes medioambientales como predictoras de la conducta anti-ecológica ilegal
Psychological research into illegal anti-environmental behaviour is scarce because this type of behaviour is difficult to analyse and conceptualize. Motivational variables and, in particular, regulation mechanisms can help to explain this type of environmentally significant behaviour. The aim of this research is to analyse the relationship between pro-environmental motives and illegal anti-environmental behaviour. A total of 311 university students completed a questionnaire that included a Spanish translation of the Motivation Toward the Environment Scale, questions about illegal anti-environmental behaviour and regulation to respect environmental laws. The results indicate that the factor structure of the scale, obtained by means of confirmatory factor analysis, is the same as the one proposed by its authors. Furthermore, we ascertained that pro-environmental motives predict pro-environmental and also illegal anti-environmental behaviour, but that the percentage of explained variance is higher when using regulation to respect environmental laws.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrigoB. A.LynchM. J. (2015). The human consequences of ecological violence and corporate victimization: Public sector psychology and green criminology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 227–229. doi:10.1177/0306624X14568885
2.
BelsleyD. A. (1982). Assessing the presence of harmful collinearity and other forms of weak data through a test for signal-to-noise. Journal of Econometrics, 20, 211–253. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(82)90020-3
3.
BryantF. B.SatorraA. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 372–398. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.687671
4.
De GrootJ. I. M.StegL. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 368–378. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
5.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
6.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.v26:4
7.
HernándezB.MartínA. M.HessS.Martínez-TorviscoJ.SuárezE.SalazarM.RamírezG. (2005). Análisis multidimensional de la percepción del delito ecológico. Medio Ambiente Y Comportamiento Humano, 6, 51–70.
8.
KorsellL. E. (2001). Big stick, little stick: Strategies for controlling and combating environmental crime. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2, 127–148. doi:10.1080/140438501753737615
9.
MåraldE. (2001). The BT Kemi scandal and the establishment of the environmental crime concept. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2, 149–170. doi:10.1080/140438501753737624
10.
MartínA. M.HernándezB. (2008). La percepción social de las transgresiones contra el medio ambiente. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología, 147, 20–24.
11.
MartínA. M.HernándezB.Frías-ArmentaM.HessS. (2014). Why ordinary people comply with environmental laws: A structural model on normative and attitudinal determinants of illegal anti-ecological behavior behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 80–103. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02062.x
12.
MartínA. M.HernándezB.HessS.SuárezE.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.RuizC. (2008). Valoración social y asignación de castigo en transgresiones a las leyes de protección del medio ambiente. Psicothema, 20, 90–96.
13.
MartínA. M.HessS.AlonsoI.Frías-ArmentaM. (2011). Utilizan las personas legas las mismas categorías de transgresiones medioambientales que las administraciones públicas?Psyecology, 2, 179–192. doi:10.1174/217119711795712531
14.
MartínA. M.Salazar-LaplaceM.-E.HessS.RuizC.KaplanM. F.HernándezB.SuárezE. (2008). Individual breaches of environmental laws in cases from public administration files. Deviant Behavior, 29, 611–639. doi:10.1080/01639620701839443
15.
OsbaldistonR.SheldonK. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 349–357. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00035-5
16.
PelletierL. G. (2002). A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behaviors. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (Cap. 10, pp. 205-232). Rochester, NY: University Rochester Press.
17.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.Green-DemersI.NoelsK.BeatonA. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment?: The motivation toward the environment scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437–468. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
18.
Renaud-DubéA.TaylorG.LekesN.KoestnerR.GuayF. (2010). Adolescents’ motivation toward the environment: Age-related trends and correlates. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42, 194–199. doi:10.1037/a0018596
19.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
20.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
23.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
VallerandR. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In ZannaM. (Comp.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
VillacortaM.KoestnerR.LekesN. (2003). Further validation of the motivation toward the environment scale. Environment & Behavior, 35, 486–505. doi:10.1177/0013916503035004003
26.
WebbDSoutarG. NMazzarolTSaldarisP. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change: Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.003
