Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2014-01
Air pollution in Mexico City: attribution and perception of causes and effects / La contaminación del aire en la Ciudad de México: atribución y percepción de sus causas y efectos
Air pollution is caused by human activities and affects health. As an imminent risk to the inhabitants of Mexico City’s Metropolitan Area, both environmental and socio-cultural aspects must be taken into account. Because of the psychological dimensions’ relevance as predecessors of environmental behaviour, the aim of this study is to describe air pollution’s perception, causal attribution and their relation. Results show differences by age, education, location and awareness. The use of cars and of public transport is attributed to behavioural characteristics, while household energy saving and car maintenance are attributed to personal factors. The perception of causes and effects points out energy saving as attributed to personal factors. To attribute car use to circumstances leads to explain the use of public transport to personal factors. Identifying these characteristics will allow policy makers to design tailored informational campaigns, address specific necessities and intervene more effectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambergS.HuneckeM.BlöbaumA. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 190–203.
2.
BambergS.MoserG. (2006). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho–social determinants of pro–environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.
3.
BielA.ThøgersenJ. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour, Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93–112.
4.
BrandK. (2002). Conciencia y comportamiento medioambientales: estilos de vida más verdes. In RedcliftM.Woodgate (Coords.)G., Sociología del medio ambiente: una perspectiva internacional (pp. 205–233). Madrid: McGraw Hill.
5.
BravoH. (1987). La contaminación del aire en México. México:Universo Veintiuno.
6.
BravoH.SosaR.SánchezP.KrupaS. (2013). Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter (PM) at high altitude cities. Environmental Pollution, 173, 255–256.
7.
CatalánM. V. (2006). Estudio de la percepción pública de la contaminación del aire y sus riesgos para la salud: perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas. Revista del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, 19(1), 28–37.
8.
ClevelandM.KalamasM.LarocheM. (2005). Shades of green. Linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviours. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 198–212.
9.
Comisión Metropolitana Ambiental (CAM) (2002). Programa para Mejorar la Calidad del Aire en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2002–2010. México: SEMARNAT.
10.
Comisión Metropolitana Ambiental (CAM) (2010). Agenda de Sustentabilidad Ambiental para la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México. México: CAM.
11.
Comisión Metropolitana Ambiental (CAM) (2011). Programa para Mejorar la Calidad del Aire en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2011-2012. México: SEMARNAT.
12.
Díaz-GuerreroR. (1972). Hacia una teoría histórico-bio-psico-sociocultural del comportamiento humano. México: Trillas.
13.
FolkesV. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 548–565.
14.
GardnerG.SternP. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
HinesJ. M.HungerfordH. R.TomeraA. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analyis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1–8.
16.
JacobsonH. K.PriceM. F. (1990). A framework for research on the human dimensions of global environmental change. Barcelona: Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme.
17.
JaimesM.BravoH.SosaR.RetamaA. (2010). Diseño del monitoreo de precursores oxidantes fotoquímicos en la Ciudad de México y su área metropolitana. México:Fundación MAPFRE.
18.
JohnsonB. B. (2002). Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 725–738.
19.
KaiserF. G.ShimodaT. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 243–253.
20.
KelleyH.MichelaJ. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
21.
KrommD. E. (1973). Response to air pollution in Ljubljana, Yugoslavia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 63(2), 208–217.
22.
LezamaJ. (2006). La gestión ambiental metropolitana: el caso de la contaminación del aire en el Valle de México. In LezamaJ.Morelos (Coords.)J., Población, ciudad y medio ambiente en el México contemporáneo (pp. 517–558). México: Colegio de México.
23.
LivermanD. M.O’BrienK. L. (1994). The Perception and Management of Global Environmental Risks in México. In GroupSocial Learning (Ed.), Learning to manage global environmental risk (Vol. 1). Boston: MIT Press.
24.
MercadoS.TeránA.MuñozR.ReyesD. (2004). La percepción social de la contaminación del aire en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de México. In Rodríguez (Coord.)G., Medicina conductual en México,Vol. 1 (pp. 166–169). México: Porrúa.
25.
MolinaL.MolinaM. (2005). La calidad del aire en la megaciudad de México. Un enfoque integral. México:Fondo de Cultura Económica.
26.
MoserG. (2003). Environmental psychology for the 21st century: The challenge of sustainable development. Revista de Psicología, 12(2), 11–17.
27.
MugicaV.FigueroaJ.HernándezA. (2010). Evaluación y seguimiento del Programa para Mejorar la Calidad del Aire en la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2002–2010. México: UAM–Azcapotzalco.
28.
MukherjeeB. N. (1993). Public response to air pollution in Calcuta property. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 207–230.
29.
NúñezL.EspinaM.MartínL.VegaL.RodríguezA.ÁngelG. (2008). Perspectiva metodológica en las percepciones socioambientales. La Habana: Caminos.
30.
Pavalache-IlieM.UnianuE. (2011). Locus of control and the pro-environmental attitudes. Procedia, 33, 198–202.
31.
PidgeonN. (1998). Risk Assessment, Risk Values and the Social Science Programme: Why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, 5–15.
32.
Secretaria del Medio Ambiente-GDF (SMA-GDF) (2006). Gestión Ambiental del Aire en el Distrito Federal. México: GDF.
33.
RehdanzK.MaddisonD. (2008). Local environmental quality and life satisfaction in Germany. Ecological Economics, 64, 787–797.
34.
RodríguezF. (1991). Percepción ambiental. In BurilloF.Aragonés (Comps.)J., Introducción a la psicología ambiental (pp. 21–32). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
35.
SchwarzA. (2008). Covariation-based causal attributions during organizational crises: Suggestions for extending Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(1), 31–53.
36.
SeligmanM. E.Nolen-HoeksemaS.ThorntonN.ThorntonK. M. (1990). Explanatory style as a mechanism of disappointing athletic performance. Psychological Science, 1(2), 143–146.
37.
TukeyD.BorgidaE. (1983). An intra-subject approach to causal attribution. Journal of Personality, 51 (2), 137–150.
38.
UzzellD. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318.
39.
WernerC.BrownB.AltmanI. (2002). Transactionally oriented research: Examples and strategies. In BechtelR.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environment psychology (pp. 203–221). New York: Wiley & Sons.
40.
WilliamsI. D.BierdA. (2003). Public perception of air quality of life in urban and suburban areas of London. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 5, 253–259.
41.
WinterD. N.KogerS. M. (2004). The psychology of environmental problems. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
