Coping with ambient stress: factorial structure and stressor-specificity of a general scale / Afrontamiento del estrés ambiental: estructura factorial y especificidad de estresores en una escala general
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2015
Coping with ambient stress: factorial structure and stressor-specificity of a general scale / Afrontamiento del estrés ambiental: estructura factorial y especificidad de estresores en una escala general
The aim of this study was (a) to examine the factorial structure of coping with ambient stress and (b) to examine the stressor-specificity of coping strategies. A German questionnaire was compiled and tested in an online survey (N = 703). Most of the final 23 items referred to environmental burdens and pollution in general. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified three subscales with a common second-order factor: environmental concern/activism, optimism and self-protection (Cronbach’s α: .71 to .88). A paper-and-pencil study (N = 109) confirmed the three-factor structure. In addition, coping items were reformulated to relate to five specific ambient stressors. Results showed positive correlations between responses to stressor-specific items and general items, but their degree and significance varied between stressors and subscales. Thus, the general scale on coping with ambient stress may be applied in multiple-stressor research. For research on stressor-specificity of coping strategies, stressor-specific instruments should be used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BatinicB.ReipsU.-D.BosnjakM. (Eds.). (2002). Online social scienes. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
2.
BrewerN. T.ChapmanG. B.GibbonsF. X.GerrardM.McCaulK. D.WeinsteinN. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
3.
CampbellJ. M. (1983). Ambient stressors: Environment and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 15, 355–380. doi:10.1177/0013916583153005
4.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
5.
CavaliniP. M.Koeter-KemmerlingL. G.PullesM. P. J. (1991). Coping with odour annoyance and odour concentrations: Three field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 123–142. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80072-6
6.
ClarkeA. T. (2006). Coping with interpersonal stress and psychosocial health among children and adolescents: A meta analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 10–23. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-9001-x
7.
EvansG. W. (2001). Environmental stress and health. In BaumA.RevensonT. A.SingerJ. E. (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 365–385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
EvansG. W.CohenS. (1987). Environmental stress. In StokolsD. (Ed.), A Wiley-interscience publication. Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 571–610). New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
HomburgA.MatthiesE. (1998). Umweltpsychologie: Umweltkrise, Gesellschaft und Individuum [Environmental psychology: Environmental crisis, society, and individual]. Weinheim: Juventa.
10.
HomburgA.StolbergA. (2004). Entwicklung und erste Validierung der SEBU-S [Development and first validation of the SEBU-S]. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 199–211. doi:10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.199
11.
HomburgA.StolbergA.WagnerU. (2007). Coping with global environmental problems: Development and first validation of scales. Environment and Behavior, 39, 754–778. doi:10.1177/0013916506297215
12.
HonoldJ.BeyerR.LakesT.van der MeerE. (2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 305–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002
13.
IwataO. (2002). Coping style and three psychological measures associated with environmentally responsible behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30, 661–669. doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.7.661
14.
JankeW.ErdmannG.BoucseinW. (1985). Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen [Coping with stress questionnaire]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15.
JusterR.-P.McEwenB. S.LupienS. J. (2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 2–16. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002
16.
KalsE. (1995). Umwelt- und gesundheitsrelevantes Verhalten [Environment and health behavior]. In KeulA. (Ed.), Wohlbefinden in der Stadt (pp. 43–68). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
17.
KöcklerH.KatzschnerL.KupskiS.KatzschnerA.PelzA. (2007). Umweltbezogene Gerechtigkeit und Immissionsbelastungen am Beispiel der Stadt Kassel [Environmental justice and immission burdens in the city of Kassel]. CESR-Paper 1. University of Kassel.
18.
LauxL.WeberH. (1990). Bewältigung von Emotionen [Coping with emotions]. In SchererK. R. (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (pp. 560–629). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
19.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
21.
LeporeS. J.EvansD. R. (1996). Coping with multiple stressors in the environment. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping. Theory, research, applications (pp. 350–377). New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
MatthiesE. (1995). Aspekte der Bedrohlichkeit von Umweltbelastungen. Eine explorative Untersuchung mit der Repertory Grid-Technik[Aspects of threats of environmental burdens. An exploratory study using the repertory grid technique]. (AE Kognitions- und Umweltpsychologie No. 45/1995). Bochum: Ruhr-Universität, Department of Psychology.
23.
OjalaM. (2007). Confronting macrosocial worries: Worry about environmental problems and proactive coping among a group of young volunteers. Futures, 39, 729–745. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.11.007
24.
OjalaM. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 225–233. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004
25.
PacioneM. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
26.
PriemusH. (1986). Housing as a social adaptation process: A conceptual scheme. Environment and Behavior, 18, 31–52. doi:10.1177/0013916586181002
27.
QuinnC. H.ZiervogelG.TaylorA.TakamaT.ThomallaF. (2011). Coping with multiple stresses in rural South Africa. Ecology and Society, 16(3). doi:10.5751/ES-04216-160302
28.
RuffF. M. (1990). Ökologische Krise und Risikobewusstsein [Ecological crisis and risk awareness]. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
29.
SchererK.WallbotH.SummerfieldA. (1986). Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SchwarzerR.SchwarzerC. (1996). A critical survey of coping instruments. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research and applications (pp. 107–132). New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
SkinnerE.EdgeK.AltmanJ.SherwoodH. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
32.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
