ValoneD.A.“Fertilization.”Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine. Vol. 65, No. 3, pp 167–72, May, 1998.
2.
PaulPopeVIHumane Vitae, Pauline Books & Media, July 25, 1968
3.
MosherS.W. (America's Frozen Population) Population Research Institute Review, 12, July-August 2001
4.
Van SteirteghemA.(Children born after assisted. reproductive technology)American Journal of Perinatology.2002. Feb; 19(2): 59–65.
5.
GarrisonMarsha (Law making for baby making: An interpretive approach to the determination of legal parentage) Harvard Law Review, Vol. 113, No: 4, 838, FEB. 2000.
CollitonW. F.Jr. (Does Prenatal Testing Have Value?) ALL About Issues/March-April 1992, P35.
8.
KopaczynskiGermain OFM Conv., (Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis) Ethics & Medics, Vol 27, No 5, May 2002.
9.
(1999 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SARI) Birmingham, Alabama, and RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, Somerville, Massachusetts, 1.
10.
Catechism of the Catholic. Church, Libreria Vaticana. 571.
11.
Catechism of the Catholic. Church, 572
12.
Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Donum Vitae, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation Feb, 22, 1987. Pauline Books. & Media, Boston, MA 02130.
13.
Donum Vitae, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation, 16.
14.
Donum Vitae, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation, 13.
15.
Donum Vitae, Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation, 16–17.
AshleyB.O.P.Theologies of the Body, The Pope John XXIII Medical-Moral Research and Education Center, Braintree, MA, 1985 & 1995, 445.
19.
EvansM.I.“Improvements in Outcomes of Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction With Increased Experience,”American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology., 2001 Jan; 184(2): 97–103.
20.
EvansM. I.“What Are the Ethical and Technical Problems Associated With Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction?”Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 41 No.1, March 1998, 47–53.
21.
JonesH.W.“Twins or More,”Fertility & Sterility, Vol. 63, No. 4, April 1995; 701–2.
22.
SakkasD.“Assessment of Early Cleaving in vitro Fertilized Human Embryos at the 2-cell Stage before Transfer Improves Embryo Selection,”Fertility & Sterility2001, Vol. 76, No 6, 1150–6.
23.
GardnerD. K.“Noninvasive Assessment of Human Embryo Nutrient Consumption as a Measure of Developmental Potential,”Fertility & Sterility2001, Vol. 76, No 6, 1175–80.
24.
RichterK. S. (Quantitative Grading of a Human Blastocyst: Optimal Inner Cell Mass Size and Shape) Fertility & Sterility Vol. 76, No 6, 1157–67.
Ben-RafaelZion (Incidence of Abortion in Pregnancies after In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer) Obstetrics & Gynecology Vol. 71, No.3, Part I, March 1988, 297–99.
27.
Board of Trustees Report. (Frozen Pre-embryos) Journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 263, No. 18, 2484–87, May 9, 1990.
28.
Vital and Health Statistics, Series 21, No. 56, (Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates by Outcome: Estimates for the United States) 1976-96, P2, Variations by Marital Status.
29.
“Who Gets Abortions?”Washington Times, October 9, 2002, A11.
30.
MMWR- Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, CDC Abortion Surveillance -United States, 1996, July 30, 1999 /Vol. 48/ No. SS-4, 5.
31.
Report of the Department of Public Health and Hygiene, prepared by the Office of Public Health Assessment. Maryland Abortions – calendar year 1999, prepared October, 2000.
32.
“Divorces Set Record, Affect More Children,”Washington Star, June 9, 1981, 2.
33.
NeuhausR.J.“The Return of Eugenics,”Commentary, 15-26 April, 1988.
