KsicherC.W.“Why Hatch is Wrong on Human Life,”Human Events, July 16, 2001.
2.
CarlsonBruceHuman Embryology (Livingston, New York: Churchill, 1994).
3.
RosenfeldAlbertSecond Genesis. The Coming Control of Life, (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969), p. 108.
4.
Syllabus: Roe, et al. v. Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County. Supreme Court of the United States, No. 70-18. Decided January 22, 1973.
5.
William L. Webster, et al. v. Reproductive Health Services, et al., Amici Curiae Brief of 167 Distinguished Scientists and Physicians Including 11 Nobel Laureates in Support of Appellaes, October, 1988. Reviewed by Susan Solomon, Graduate Student, University of Arizona College of Medicine, personal communication.
6.
Stenberg, Attorney General of Nebraska, et al. v. Carhart. Supreme Court of the United States. No 99-830. Decided June 28, 2000. Those using the phrase “potential human life” included Justice Breyer, writing for the majority of 5, with affirmations by Justices Stevens, O'Connor, Souter and Ginsberg. Dissenting opinions of Justices Kennedy and Thomas also used the phrase.
7.
GrobsteinClifford, “External Human Fertilization,”Scientific American, 240: 57–67, 1979.
8.
JonesHowardJr.“What is an Embryo?”Fertility and Sterility, 77: 658–659, 2002.
9.
KingT.J., and BriggsR.“Transplantation of Living Nuclei from Blastula Cells into Enucleated Frog Eggs,”Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sciences, 38: 455, 1952.
10.
JeffreyT.P.“NIH Mass Produces ‘Human’ Mouse,”Human Events, October 12, 2001, pp. 1–9.
11.
ShelleyMaryFrankenstein, 1818, reprinted by Bantam Books, 1981, p. 42.