In a phone conversation, July 17, 1997, Dr. Howard Jones said he personally knows of twenty cases in which one can argue that fusion took place. He sent an article indicating a number of cases of human hermaphrodites, i.e., humans having not only a substantial number of XX chromosomal cells to produce female sex organs but also a substantial number of XY chromosomal cells to produce male sex organs (1970). The case he and Dr. Bias present has a 46XX/46XY chromosome complement. While acknowledging that this can be explained in a number of ways, Dr. Jones postulates that it is due to the fusion of two embryos. He named this condition a case of “genetic chimerism,” i.e., the presence of different cell lines due to different zygotes and he distinguished it from “mosaicism” in which different cell lines originate from a common zygote (Jones and Bias 1970, 377, 382). Since neither Grobstein who is eager to argue that recombination can occur in humans (1988) nor Moore (1993) postulate that the XX-XY phenomenon is due to fusion of two embryos, it appears that the “fusion interpretation” is not generally accepted by embryologists.
2.
Ashley, BenedictO.P.“A Critique of the Theory of Delayed Hominization,” in An Ethical Evaluation of Fetal Experimentation: An Interdisciplinary Study, ed. McCarthyD.G., and MaraczewskiS., 113–133. St. Louis: Pope John XXIII Medical-Moral Research and Education Center, 1976.
3.
AquinasThomas, Summa Theologica.
4.
AnstelleCategories.
5.
BedateCA., and CefaloR.C.“The Zygote: To Be or Not to Be a Person.”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 14 (December 1989): 641–645.
6.
BenirschkeKurtCurrent Topics in Pathology1 (1969) 1.
7.
BoethiusDe Duabus Naturis.
8.
BoleThomas J.“Metaphysical Accounts of the Zygote as a Person and the Veto Power of Facts.”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy1989, 14 (December) 647–654; “Zygotes, Souls, Substances, and Persons.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1990, 15: (December) 637-652.
9.
BruggerWalter, and BakerKenneth“Individual.”Philosophical Dictionary.Spokane: Gonzaga University Press, 1972.
10.
CahillLisa Sowie“The Embryo and the Fetus: New Moral Contexts.”Theological Studies1993, 54: 124–143.
11.
DawsonKaren“Segmentation and Moral Status.” InEmbryo Experimentation. Ed. SingerPeter53–58?New York: Cambridge University Press. 1990.
12.
DiamondJames J.M.D.“Abortion, Animation, and Biological Hominization.”Theological Studies1975, 36: 305–324.
13.
Donceel, JosephS.J.“Abortion: Mediate vs. Immediate Animation.”Continuum1967, 5: 167–171.; “Immediate Animation and Delayed Hominization.” Theological Studies 1970, 31: 776-105.
14.
FlamanPaul“When Did I Begin? Another Critical Response to Norman Ford.”Linacre Quarterly1991, 58 (November): 39–55.
15.
FordNorman M.S.D.B.When Did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy and Science.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
16.
Gallagher, JohnO.S.B.Is the Human Embryo a Person? A Philosophical Investigation.Totonto: Human Life Research Institute, 1985.
17.
GrobsteinCliffordScience and the Unborn.New York: Basic Books, 1988.
18.
HeaneyStephen J.“Aquinas and the Presence of the Human Rational Soul in the Early Embryo.”The Thomist1992, 56: 19–48.
IrvingDianne NutwellPh.D.“Scientific Philosophical Expertise: An Evaluation of the Arguments on ‘Personhood’.”Linacre Quarterly1993, 60 (February): 18–45.
21.
JohnsonMark“Quaestio Disputata: Delayed Hominization: A Rejoinder to Thomas Shannon.”Theological Studies1997, 58: 708–714.
22.
JonesHoward W.Jr., M.D., and BiasWilma B.Ph.D.“True Hermaphroditism with 46,XX/ 46, XY Chromosome Complement. Report of a Case.”Obstetrics/ Gynecology1970, 36 (September) 3: 377–387.
23.
KischerC. WardM.S., Ph.D., and Dianne IrvingM.A.Ph.D.The Human Development Hoax: Time to Tell the Truth.Clinton Township, MI: Gold Leaf Press, 1995.
24.
Lonergan, BernardJ.F., S.J.Insight, a Study of Human Understanding.New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1957.
25.
McCormick, RichardS.J.“Who or What is the Pre-Embryo?”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal1991, 1: 1–15.
26.
Mahoney, JohnS.J.Bioethics and Belief. Religion and Medicine in Dialogue.Westminster, MD: Christina Classics, Inc.; London: Sheed and Ward, 1984.
RahnerKarl“The Problem of Genetic Manipulation” in Theological Investigations, 225–252. New York: Saber Press, 1972.
29.
RahnerKarl, ed. Encyclopedia of Theology: The Concise Sacramentum Mundi.New York: Saber, 1975, s.v. “Person,” by Max Miller and Alois Haider.
30.
RobboyStanley J., DugganMarie A., and KurmanRobert J.“The Female Reproductive System” inPathology, Second Edition. Ed. RubinEmmanuel, M.D. and FarberJohn L., M.D. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1994.
31.
ShannonThomas A., and WolterAllan B., O.F.M. “Moral Status of the Pre-Embryo.”Theological Studies, 199051. 603–626., “A Further Postscript to Mark Johnson.” Theological Studies, 1997 58: 715-717.
32.
SuarezAntoine“Hydatidiform Moles and Teratomas Confirm the Human Identity of the Preimplanted Embryo.”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.1990, 15 (December): 627–636.