HaldaneJohn B., Heredity and Politics (London: Allen and Unwin,1938).
2.
See Stokinger, and Mountain“Tests for Hypersusceptibility to Hemolytic Chemicals,”Archive Environmental Health6 (1963), 57–64.
3.
See MurrayThomas H., “Ethical Issues in Human Genome Research,”FASEB Journal5 (1991), 55–60.
4.
See FostNorman, “Ethical Implications of Screening Asymptomatic Individuals”FASEB Journal6 (1992). p. 2815.
5.
See AndrewsLori B., “Public Choices and Private Choices, Legal Regulation of Genetic Testing,” in Justice and the Human Genome Project, eds. MurphyT.F., and LappeM.A. (Berkeley: University of California Press. 1994). pp. 52–53.
6.
See BairdPatricia A., “Altering Human Genes: Social. Ethical and Legal Implication,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine37 (1994), 566–575.
7.
See BairdPatricia A., “Altering Human Genes: Social. Ethical and Legal Implication,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine37 (1994), 566–575.
8.
See BairdPatricia A., “Altering Human Genes: Social. Ethical and Legal Implication,”Perspectives in Biology and Medicine37 (1994), p. 574.
9.
See RichardW. Fox, and LearsT.J. JacksonThe Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980 (New York: Pantheon Books,1983); Nathan Keyfitz, “Consumerism and the New Poor.” Society 29 (1992), 42–47: Christopher Lasch. “The Culture of Narcissism.” in American Social Character: Modern Interpretations: from the 40's to the Present, ed. R. Wilkinson (New York: IconEditions, 1992). pp. 2410267; Kevin Robins, “Forces of Consumption: From the Symbolic to the Psychotic,” Media, Culture and Society 16 (1994), 449–468; Joseph Sobran, “Evolving Standards: Liberalism, Hedonism and Homosexuality,” Human Life Review 19 (1993). 7–16.
10.
See HeardGerry C., Basic Values and Ethical Decisions: An Explanation of Individualism and Community in American Society (Malabar, Florida: R.E. Kroeger Publishing Co.1990). pp. 3–8; David M. Potter. “American Individualism in the Twentieth Century,” in American Social Character: Modern Interpretations: from the 40's to the Present, ed. R. Wilkinson (New York: IconEditons, 1992) pp. 159–179.
11.
See RileyJonathan, “Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government,”Ethics100 (1990), 335–348.
12.
See PressNancy, and BrownerC.H.“Risk. Autonomy and Responsibility. Informed Consent for Prenatal Testing.”Hastings Center Report25 (1995), S9–S12.
13.
See DickmanSteven, “We're not Just Readouts of Our Genes: Harvard Professor Criticizes Human Genome Project.”Annals of Oncology5 (1994). 669–670.
14.
See MiringoffMarque-Luisa, “Dissecting People and Ignoring Social structure: An Analysis of Individualism, Public Policy, and Genetic Labeling,”Behavioral Sciences and the Law14 (1996). 433–442, where it is argued that children are more susceptible to genetic labeling.
15.
See SilvermanPaul H.“Commerce and Genetic Diagnosis,”Hastings Center Report25 (1995), S15–S18.
16.
See JohnPope XXIII, Encyclical Mater et Magistra, 1961, III: AAS 53, 447.
17.
RieloFernando“Hacia una Nueva Concepción Metafísica del Ser,” in Existe una Filosofía Española? (Madrid: Editorial Fernando Rielo, 1988), p. 124.
18.
See Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, U.S. National Conference of Catholic Bishops. 1994. nos. 1 and 27.
19.
See PaulPope JohnII, Encyclical letter Evangelium Vitae, 1995, no. 87.
20.
See. for example, Pope Paul VI. Encyclical letter Humane Vitae, 1968, or Pope John Paul II, Encyclical letter Evangelium Vitae.1995, no. 63.
21.
See editorial, “Genetics, Ethics and Human Values,”FASEB Journal9 (1995). 699–700.
22.
See FletcherJoseph, “Moral Problems and Ethical Issues in Prospective Human Gene Therapy,”Virginia Law Review69 (1983), 515–546.
23.
See NelsonJohn Robert, On the New Frontiers of Genetics and Religion (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,1994), p. 115,
24.
See NelsonJohn Robert, On the New Frontiers of Genetics and Religion (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,1994), pp. 115–116.
25.
See Donum Vitae, “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation,”1987, no. 1.6.
26.
See PaulPope JohnII, Address to Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Biological Research and Human Dignity,Origins12 (1982), 342–343.