John PaulI.I., “Message to Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Evolution” (Revised Translation),Origins Dec. 5 (1996): 415 (4.2).
2.
L'Osservatore Romano English language editor, Fr. Robert Dempsey, noted that rather than translating the French phrase [“… de nouvelles connaissances conduisant a reconnaitre dans la theorie d'evolution plus qu'une hypopthese”] as “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than one hypothesis,” a translation more in line with the point being made by the Pope would be “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than a hypothesis in the theory of evolution,” or perhaps more smoothly translated: “new knowledge leads to the recognition that the theory of evolution is more than a hypothesis.” (Catholic Register, December 1, 1996, p. 3).
3.
L'Osservatore Romano English language editor, Fr. Robert Dempsey, noted that rather than translating the French phrase [“… de nouvelles connaissances conduisant a reconnaitre dans la theorie d'evolution plus qu'une hypopthese”] as “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than one hypothesis,” a translation more in line with the point being made by the Pope would be “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than a hypothesis in the theory of evolution,” or perhaps more smoothly translated: “new knowledge leads to the recognition that the theory of evolution is more than a hypothesis.” (Catholic Register, December 1, 1996, p. 415 (4.5).
4.
L'Osservatore Romano English language editor, Fr. Robert Dempsey, noted that rather than translating the French phrase [“… de nouvelles connaissances conduisant a reconnaitre dans la theorie d'evolution plus qu'une hypopthese”] as “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than one hypothesis,” a translation more in line with the point being made by the Pope would be “new knowledge leads to the recognition of more than a hypothesis in the theory of evolution,” or perhaps more smoothly translated: “new knowledge leads to the recognition that the theory of evolution is more than a hypothesis.” (Catholic Register, December 1, 1996, p. 415 (4.1).
5.
WalsheSir Francis, “Some Views Upon the Nature of the Relationship Between Mind and Brain,”The Journal of Medical Education.XXXIII (1958): 1116.
6.
“Message,” p. 414(2.1).
7.
Message, “p. 415(6).
8.
Message, p. 414 (2).
9.
Message, p. 415 (5.5).
10.
SaganCarl, The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence (New York: Random House,1977), p. 210.
11.
HuxleyThomas, Essays of a Humanist (New York: Harper and Row,1964), p. 110.
12.
Szent-GyorgyiAlbertThe Cell and Protoplasm ed. by Moulton (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1940), p. 160.
13.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life Nov. (1996): 38–56.
14.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life Nov. (1996): p. 50.
15.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life Nov. (1996): p. 56.
16.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life Nov. (1996):, p. 50. Since the mapping of the human genome project has not been completed, it seems a bit premature to comment with certainty about the percentage of genetic similarity between chimps and humans.
17.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life, p. 50–51.
18.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life, p. 51.
19.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life, p. 54.
20.
MillerKenneth, and NilssonLennart, “What Does It Mean To Be One of Us?”Life, p. 56.
21.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), pp. 297–307.].
22.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), p. 159–160.
23.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), p. 297 quoting Alfred North Whitehead, Adventures of Ideas (Middlesex, Eng.: Penguin Books, 1948), p. 166.
24.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), p. 305 quoting Sir Julian Huxley, no source given.
25.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), p. 298 quoting William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Nature (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1902), p. 108.
26.
For most of the material in this section I am indebted to Dr. Larry Azar and his thorough analysis of distinctive human behavior. [Man: Computer, Ape, or Angel? (Hanover, MA: The Christopher Publishing House, 1989), p. 301.