Pontifical Academy for Life/The Embryo, “When Human Life Begins,”Origins26, no. 40 (1997): 662.
2.
The Roslin Institute and PPL Therapeutics. News Release, Roslin, Midlothian. UK, 24 February 1997.
3.
StewartColin, “An Udder Way of Making Lambs.”Nature385 (1997) 769.
4.
CohenJacques, and TomkinGiles, “The Science. Fiction, and Reality of Embryo Cloning,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal4, no. 3 (1994): 195. See also Michael B. Burke, “Sortal Essentialism and the Potentiality Principle,” Review of Metaphysics 49 (1996): 500.
5.
LederbergJoshua, “Experimental Genetics and Human Evolution,”The American Naturalist100 (1966): 519–31.
6.
The term “fabricated man” was coined by Ramsey. His commentary on the theology and ethics of cloning can be found in his book: RamseyPaul, Fabricated Man: The Ethics of Genetic Control (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,1970).
7.
AllenD. Verhey“Cloning: Revisiting an Old Debate,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal4, no. 3 (1994): 230. Fletcher's thesis appears in his book: Joseph Fletcher, Morals and Medicine (Boston: Beacon Press, 1954).
8.
Verhey 229–30.
9.
AnnasGeorge J., “Regulatory Models for Human Embryo Cloning: The Free Market, Professional Guidelines, and Government Restrictions.”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal4, no. 3 (1994): 236.
10.
A recent review of reaction to the concept of human cloning can be found LozzioM.J., “Science, Ethics, and Cloning Technologies,”Linacre Quarterly64, no. 4 (1997): 46–52.
11.
Verhey230–2.
12.
LeonR. Kass“New Beginnings in Life,”The New Genetics and the Future of Man, ed. HamiltonMichael P. (Grand Rapids. MI: Eerdmans, 1971) 42–63.
13.
Kass 46–7.
14.
Kass 53
15.
McCormickRichard A., “Blastomere Separation: Some Concerns,”Hastings Center Report24, no. 2 (1994): 14–6.
16.
JonesHoward W.Jr., EdwardsRobert G., and SeidelGeorge E.Jr., “On Attempts at Cloning in the Human,”Fertility and Sterility61, no. 3 (1994): 423.
17.
Researchers have successfully “cloned” human embryos by using a technique to artificially separate the cells of a pre-embryo while they are still totipotent, thus obtaining two identical entities. This process is known as blastomere separation. Another type of cloning widely used in the cattle industry is the bisection technique, in which embryos are bisected at the blastocyst stage, giving rise, again, to two identical entities. Both these processes are, in essence, an artificial method of twinning; the offspring, regardless of number, are ultimately the product of sexual reproduction in which the genotype is derived from both male and female parents.
18.
Cohen 196.
19.
WilmutI, “Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells,”Nature385 (27 February 1997): 810.
The final conclusions and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission are summarized in “Cloning Human Beings: Responding to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission,”The Hastings Center Report27, no. 5 (1997): 8–9.
23.
McGinleyLaurie, “U.S. Bioethics Panel to Recommend Ban on Cloning to Produce a Human Being,”Wall Street Journal 9 June 1997.
24.
A brief historical review of artificial reproductive technology may be found in JersildPaul T., “On Having Children: A Theological and Moral Analysis of In Vitro Fertilization,”Questions About the Beginning of Life, ed. SchneiderEdward D. (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1985) 31–2.
25.
ThomasA. Shannon, and CahillLisa Sowle, Religion and Artificial Reproduction: An Inquiry into the Vatican “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Human Reproduction” (New York: Crossroad,1988) 6–7. See also Jersild 34–5.
26.
Manicheism was a Gnostic religious system that espoused dualistic concepts of the world, i.e., the radical duality between Good and Evil.
27.
BurkeCormac, “St. Augustine and Conjugal Sexuality,”Communio17 (1990): 545–9. The comments of Augustine as qtd. in Burke 548.
28.
Burke 548.
29.
St. Augustine of Hippo, De bono coniugali c. 6 n. 6 (378) (qtd. in Burke, “St. Augustine” 561).
30.
McCormickRichard A., “Therapy or Tampering? The Ethics of Reproductive Technology,”America 7 Dec. 1985: 399.
31.
McCormick, “Therapy”400.
32.
PiusX.I.I., “Address to the 4th International Convention of Catholic Physicians,” (September, 1949). (qtd. in Charles E. Curran and Richard A. McCormick, Readings in Moral Theology No. 8: Dialogue About Catholic Sexual Teaching (New York: Paulist, 1993) 223–4.
33.
PiusX.I.I., “Discourse on Moral Problems of Married Life,” (October 29, 1951). (qtd. in Charles E. Curran and Richard A. McCormick, Readings in Moral Theology No. 8: Dialogue About Catholic Sexual Teaching (New York: Paulist, 1993) 225.
34.
PaulV.I., On the Regulation of Birth (Humanae Vitae)II, 12. 1968.
35.
Humanae VitaeII, nos. 10, 11.
36.
Shannon and Cahill 61.
37.
Donum VitaeII, no. 5.
38.
Donum VitaeII, no. 5.
39.
Shannon and Cahill 63.
40.
Donum VitaeI, no. 6.
41.
McCormick, “Therapy,”399.
42.
McCormick, “Therapy,”399.
43.
Pius XII, “Address.”
44.
Donum VitaeII, no. 2.
45.
McCormick, “Therapy”401.
46.
Quoted in McCormick, “Therapy”401.
47.
McCormickRichard A., How Brave a New World: Dilemmas in Bioethics (Garden City, NY: Doubleday,1981) 316.
48.
VacekEdward V., “Vatican Instruction on Reproductive Technology,”Theological Studies49 (1988): 114.
49.
WaltersLeRoy, “Ethics and New Reproductive Technologies: An International Review of Committee Statements,”Hastings Center Report17, no. 3 (1987): Special Supplement 3–9.
50.
Vacek 114.
51.
McCormickRichard A., “The Vatican Document on Bioethics: Some Unsolicited Suggestions,”America156 (1987): 24.
52.
Gaudium et spes no. 16.
53.
Vacek 115.
54.
McCormickRichard A., “The Vatican Document on Bioethics: Two Responses,”America156 (1987): 248.
55.
MaguireMarjorie Reiley, “The Vatican Has Gone Too Far,”Conscience8, no. 3 (1987): 14–5.
56.
CallahanSidney, “Lovemaking and Babymaking,”Commonweal114 (1987): 234.
57.
Vacek 119.
58.
A short commentary on “biologism”: can be found in John P. Doyle, “Reflections on Persons in Petri Dishes,” Linacre Quarterly 64, no. 4 (1997): 72–3.
59.
McCormick, “Vatican Document: Suggestions,”26.
60.
As quoted in McCormick, “Therapy,” 400.
61.
Shannon, “Cloning,”304.
62.
See notes 54 and 55.
63.
MeyerJohn R., “Cloning Human Embryos: Why Artificial Human Procreation is Immoral,”Linacre Quarterly62, no. 2 (1995) 22–9; Lisa Sowle Cahill, testimony, and Gilbert Meilaender, testimony, National Bioethics Advisory Committee, Watergate Hotel, Washington DC, 13 Mar. 1997; Edmund Pellegrino, Address to the Physicians’ Guild of the Diocese of Venice in Florida, Venice, Florida, 8 Nov. 1997; see also McCormick, “Blastomere,”; Verhey, “Cloning.”