SimondsT.A., “Aquinas and Early Term Abortion,”Linacre Quarterly61, 3 (1994), pp. 10–17.
2.
Linacre Quarterly, 14.
3.
Linacre Quarterly, 14–15.
4.
EnglandM.A., Color Atlas of Life Before Birth: Normal Fetal DevelopmentChicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1990. pp. 14, 35; Johnson, K.E., Human Developmental Anatomy. New Yorkk: John Wiley & Sons, 1988. pp. 17-27; Moore, K. L., The Developing Human: Clincally Oriented Embryology, Fourth Ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1988. pp. 13-35; Weaver, R. F. and Hedrick, P. W., Genetics. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers, 1989. pp. 66-94.
5.
Moore, op. cit, p. 2.
6.
There seems to be some evidence pointing to certain chromatic differentiation even among monozygotic twins. See: WatsonJ. W., AlbrightS. G., RaoK. W., and AylsworthA. S., “Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Partial Trisomy 1,”Obstetrics and Gynecology76 (1990), pp. 949–951.
7.
Johnson, op. cit, pp. 107–109; Moore, op. cit., pp. 122-129.
8.
AshleyB.M., “A Critique of the Theory of Delayed Hominization,” in: McCarthyD.G., and MoraczewskiA. S., eds. An Ethical Evaluation of Fetal Experimentation: An Interdisciplinary Study. Appendix I.St. Louis, MO: Pope John XXIII Medical-Moral Research and Education Center, 1976. pp. 113–133; An Ethical Evaluation of Fetal Experimentation: An Interdisciplinary Study. Appendix I, “Constructing and Reconstructing the Human Body,” The Thomist 51, 3 (1987), pp. 501-520; Ashley, B. M. and O'Rourke, D. K., Healthcare Ethics: A Theological Analysis, Third Ed. St. Louis, Missouri: The Catholic Hospital Association, 1989. pp. 211-213; May, W. E., Human Existence, Medicine and Ethics: Reflections on Human Life. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1977, pp. 93-103; Healthcare Ethics: A Theological Analysis, Third Ed, “Zygotes, Embryos, and Persons: Part I,” Ethics and Medics 16, 10 (1991), pp. 2-4; Ethics and Medics, “Zygotes, Embryos, and Persons: Part II,” Ethics and Medics 17, 1 (1992), pp. 1-3; McCarthy, D. G. and Bayer, E. J., Handbook of Critical Life Issues. St. Louis, Missouri: Pope John XXIII Medical-Moral Research and Education Center, 1982. pp. 80-90; Moraczewski, A. S., “No Brain and Yet Alive,” Ethics and Medics 16, 12 (1991), pp. 1-2; O'Donnell, T. J., “Mifepristone: the New ‘Abortion Pill,” Medical-Moral Newsletter 26, 4 (1989), p. 7; Medical-Moral Newsletter, “Early Diagnosis of Tubal Pregnancy: New Issues,” Medical Moral Newsletter 25, 6 (1988), pp. 23-24; Medical Moral Newsletter, “Ethics and Production-Line Quality Control of Human Life,” Medical-Moral Newsletter 28, 4 (1991), pp. 15-16.
9.
Simonds, op. cit, p. 16.
10.
Stedman's Medical Dictionary, 25th Ed., Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990. v. fertilization.
11.
BedateC.A., “Reflections Concerning Questions of Life and Death: Towards a New Paradigm for Understanding the Ethical Value of the Biological Human Entity,” in: MalherbeJ.F., Human Life: Its Beginnings and DevelopmentParis: L'Harmattan, 1988, pp. 67–97; Curran, C. E., “Abortion: Contemporary Debate in Philosophical and Religious Ethics,” in: Reich, W. T., Encyclopedia of Bioethics I. New York: Macmillan, 1978, pp. 17-26; Human Life: Its Beginnings and Development, Moral Theology: A Continuing Journey. Notre Dame: U. of Notre Dame Press, 1982. pp. 125-126; Moral Theology: A Continuing Journey, New Perspectives in Moral Theology. Notre Dame: Fides, 1974. p. 188; New Perspectives in Moral Theology, Ongoing Revision in Moral Theology. Notre Dame: Fides, 1975, p. 156; Ongoing Revision in Moral Theology, Transition and Tradition in Moral Theology. Notre Dame: U. of Notre Dame Press, 1979. p. 212; McCormick, R. A., “Abortion: Rules for Debate,” America 139, 2 (1978), pp. 26-30; America, “Bioethics in the Public Forum,” Milbank Memorial Quarterly: Health and Society 61, 1 (1983), pp. 113-126; Milbank Memorial Quarterly: Health and Society, Health and Medicine in the Catholic Tradition. New York: Crossroad, 1984, pp. 134-135; Health and Medicine in the Catholic Tradition, Notes on Moral Theology: 1965 through 1980. Washington: University Press of America, 1981. p. 797; Notes on Moral Theology: 1965 through 1980, “Who or What is the Preembryo?” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 1 (1991), pp. 1-15; Shannon, T. A., “The Moral Significance of Brain Integration in the Fetus,” in: Humber, J. M. and Almeder, R. F., eds., Bionedical Ethics Reviews: 1991. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press, 1991. pp. 123-144; Shannon, T. A. and Cahill, L. S., Religion and Artificial Reproduction: An Inquiry into the Vatican “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Human Reproduction”. New York: Paulist, 1979. p. 116; Shannon, T. A. And Wolter, A. B., “Reflections on the Moral Status of the Pre-Embryo.” Theological Studies 51 (1990), pp. 603-626.
12.
Time, August 29, 1994, pp. 60–61; U.S. News and World Report, October 3, 1994, p. 60.
13.
U.S. News and World Report, January 3, 1994, pp. 78–79.