Medical students have enthusiastically embraced the use of virtual reality (VR) systems to help them understand the complex anatomy of body components. We hypothesize that students studying the structure and protection of wood will show similar acceptance of VR systems. We developed X-ray micro-CT models to show the distribution of silica in the Australian marine borer resistant timber, satinay and copper in treated pine. Students taking a course in wood protection used a VR device to explore the distribution of silica in satinay and copper in pine. Students were surveyed to assess their views on the system as a learning tool. The results showed that students were very positive about the VR system, and they frequently commented that the system was better than traditional methods at aiding understanding of wood structure/protection. We discuss the limitations and potential of our VR system as a learning tool for wood technology.
BrodersenCR.2013. Visualizing wood anatomy in three dimensions with high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography (μCT) – a review. IAWA J. 34(4):408–424. doi: 10.1163/22941932-00000033
5.
BucciV, CoriglianoP, CrupiV, EpastoG, GuglielminoE, MarinòA.2017. Experimental investigation on iroko wood used in shipbuilding. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci. 231(1):128–139. doi: 10.1177/0954406216674495
6.
ClarkeSH.1938. A multiple-entry perforated-card key with special reference to the identification of hardwoods. New Phytol. 38(4):369–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1938.tb06949.x
7.
CliffordN.1957. Timber identification for the builder and architect. London: Leonard Hill.
8.
CochardH, DelzonS, BadelE.2015. X-ray microtomography (micro-CT): a reference technology for high-resolution quantification of xylem embolism in trees. Plant Cell Environ. 38(1):201–206. doi: 10.1111/pce.12391
9.
CooksonLJ, ScownD.2008. Development of marine borer natural durability classes for timber in Australia. J Inst Wood Sci. 18(2):94–104. doi: 10.1179/wsc.2008.18.2.94
10.
DiefenbachMA, WeinsteinND, O'ReillyJ.1993. Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ Res. 8(2):181–192. doi: 10.1093/her/8.2.181
11.
DinwoodieJM.1975. Timber – a review of the structure-mechanical property relationship. J Microsc. 104(1):3–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb04002.x
12.
EvansPD, MatsunagaH, AverdunkH, TurnerM, LimayeA, KataokaY, KiguchiM, SendenTJ.2014. Micro-distribution of copper in southern pine treated with particulate wood preservatives (Chapter 13). In: SchultzT., NicholasD.D., GoodellB., editors. Deterioration and protection of sustainable biomaterials. Vol. 1158. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Symposium Series; p. 227–238.
13.
EvansPD, MorrisonO, SendenTJ, VollmerS, RobertsRJ, LimayeA, ArnsCH, AverdunkH, LoweA, KnackstedtMA.2010. Visualization and numerical analysis of adhesive distribution in particleboard using X-ray micro-computed tomography. Int J Adhes Adhes. 30(8):754–762. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.08.001
GuptaR. and GopuV. (2005) Wood engineering education–trends and challenges. Proceedings of the Structures Congress, Reston, VA, 20–24.
17.
HamH, Du PlessisA, Le RouxSG.2017. Microcomputer tomography (microCT) as a tool in Pinus tree breeding: pilot studies. N Z J For Sci. 47(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40490-016-0084-9
18.
HarpeSE.2015. How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 7(6):836–850. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
19.
HartleyJ.2014. Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 14(1):83–86. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7
20.
HeadyRD, CunninghamRB, EvansPD.2008. Differences in the ultrastructure of their large warts allow white cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla) to be distinguished from black cypress pine (C. endlicheri). Wood Sci Technol. 42(4):313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00226-007-0174-1
21.
HounsfieldG.1973. Computerised transverse axial scanning (tomography). Part I. Description of system. Br J Radiol. 46(552):1016–1022. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016
22.
HuA, WilsonT, LadakH, HaaseP, DoyleP, FungK.2010. Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 39(3):315–322.
23.
IlicJ.1993. Computer aided wood identification using CSIRO ID. IAWA J. 14(4):333–340. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000587
24.
JacquinP, LonguetaudF, LebanJM, MotheF.2017. X-ray microdensitometry of wood: a review of existing principles and devices. Dendrochronologia. 42:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2017.01.004
25.
JansenS, BaasP, SmetsE.2000. Vestured pits in Malvales sl: a character with taxonomic significance hidden in the secondary xylem. Taxon. 49(2):169–182. doi: 10.2307/1223833
KeshavarzB.2016. Exploring behavioral methods to reduce visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality; July 17 (p. 147–155); Springer.
28.
KlakattawiH, VinciottiV, YuK.2018. A simple and adaptive dispersion regression model for count data. Entropy20(2):142. doi:10.3390/e20020142.
29.
KribsDA.1968. Commercial foreign woods on the American market. New York: Dover Publications.
30.
KyawBM, SaxenaN, PosadzkiP, VseteckovaJ, NikolaouCK, GeorgePP, DivakarU, MasielloI, KononowiczAA, ZaryN, CarLT.2019. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 21(1):e12959. doi: 10.2196/12959
31.
LachenbruchB.2011. Physical models as an aid for teaching wood anatomy. IAWA J. 32(3):301–312. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000059
32.
LathamB.1964. Wood, from forest to man. London: George G. Harrap and Co.
33.
LikertR.1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 140:1–55.
34.
LimayeA.2012. Drishti: a volume exploration and presentation tool. Proceedings SPIE 8506, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII; San Diego (CA), 85060X.
35.
MetcalfeCR, ChalkL.1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. London: Clarendon Press.
36.
MunafoJ, DiedrickM, StoffregenTA.2017. The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Exp Brain Res. 235(3):889–901. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7
37.
NakagawaT, OsakiS.1975. The discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab. 24(5):300–301. doi: 10.1109/TR.1975.5214915
NolfM, LopezR, PetersJM, FlavelRJ, KoloadinLS, YoungIM, ChoatB.2017. Visualization of xylem embolism by X-ray microtomography: a direct test against hydraulic measurements. New Phytol. 214(2):890–898. doi: 10.1111/nph.14462
40.
O'RourkeJ.C., SmythL., WebbA.L. and ValterK. (2019) How can we show you, if you can't see it? Trialing the use of an interactive three-dimensional micro-CT model in medical education. Anat Sci Educ 0:1–12. doi: 10.1002/ase. 1890.
41.
PankhurstRJ.1978. Biological identification. The principles and practice of identification methods in biology. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.
42.
PatilVC, BurleyJ.1985. Strategy and course curriculum for professional forestry education in India. Oxford: Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford.
43.
PhillipsEW.1941. The identification of coniferous woods by their microscopic structure. Bot J Linn Soc. 52(343):259–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1941.tb01390.x
44.
SchreckT, KeimD.2012. Visual analysis of social media data. Computer (Long Beach Calif). 46(5):68–75.
45.
SheppardA, LathamS, MiddletonJ, KingstonA, MyersG, VarslotT, FogdenA, SawkinsT, CruikshankR, SaadatfarM, FrancoisN.2014. Techniques in helical scanning, dynamic imaging and image segmentation for improved quantitative analysis with X-ray micro-CT. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B. 324:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.072
46.
SiauJF.1984. Transport processes in wood. Berlin: Springer.
47.
TanS, HuA, WilsonT, LadakH, HaaseP, FungK.2012. Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners. J Laryngol Otol. 126(4):395–401. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111002830
48.
TaoJ, EvansPD, SaadatfarM.2015. Cricket bat characterization based on X-ray computed tomography and image processing. Abstract for 2nd International Conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures, Quebec City, June 23 to July 3, 1 p.
49.
TsengCL, AlvesMC, CrestanaS.2018. Quantifying physical and structural soil properties using X-ray microtomography. Geoderma. 318:78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.042
50.
TuijthofGJ, VisserP, SiereveltIN, Van DijkCN, KerkhoffsGM.2011. Does perception of usefulness of arthroscopic simulators differ with levels of experience?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469(6):1701–1708. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1797-y
51.
VarslotT, KingstonA, MyersG, SheppardA.2011. High-resolution helical cone-beam micro-CT with theoretically exact reconstruction from experimental data. Med Phys. 38(10):5459–5476. doi: 10.1118/1.3633900
