What engineers (still) do not know about wood: An engineer's perspective on key knowledge gaps in the use of mass timber

Abstract

An engineer's viewpoint on key areas for further research and industry initiatives to support the increased use of mass timber, particularly Cross Laminated Timber. The paper identifies issues related to project delivery in UK and global construction markets including design for durability, approaches to building design complexity, sustainable supply and the end of life scenarios of buildings, and emerging net zero carbon emissions strategies and the role of forestry for products.

Keywords

Mass timber CLT sustainable supply robustness durability end of life net zero carbon embodied carbon

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARUP . 2011. Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

BIS . 2013. Construction 2025. HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/construction-2025-strategy.

Bradner

2013. Production and technology of cross laminated timber (CLT): a state-of-the-art report. Cost action. FP1004 European Conference on Cross Laminated Timber; TU Graz, May 2013.

BSI . 2004. BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A2:2014, Eurocode 5: design of timber structures. General common rules and rules for buildings. BSI.

BSI . 2006. BS EN 1991-1-7:2006, Eurocode 1 – actions on structures. General actions – accidental actions (+A1:2014) (incorporating corrigendum February 2010). BSI.

Campbell

May 2019. Mass timber in the circular economy: paradigm in practice? Eng Sustain J, ICE. 172(3):141–152. doi: 10.1680/jensu.17.00069

Campbell

, Gill

, Harrison

2016. Design and detailing of timber structures for fitness and gymnasia buildings: experience from Sky Health & Fitness Centre. World Conference on Timber Engineering.

Circular Ecology . 2019. ICE database V3.0. http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-energy-and-carbon-footprint-database.html#.XRDaIC3MxQI, accessed June 2019.

Committee on Climate Change (CCC) . 2019. Net Zero, the UK's contribution to stopping global warming. https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Net-Zero-The-UKs-contribution-to-stopping-global-warming.pdf, accessed June 2019.

10.

Cost Action FP1402 . 2018. ‘Basis of structural timber design’ – from research to standards. https://www.costfp1402.tum.de/home/, accessed June 2019.

11.

CTBUH . 2017. Tall timber a global audit. http://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/3350-TBIN.pdf, accessed May 2018.

12.

CTI . 2016. CTI Policy Report: sustainability, environment and quality standards. http://www.cti-timber.org/sites/default/files/CTI_Sustainability_report_0.pdf, accessed June 2019.

13.

Dangel

2017. Turning point in timber construction. Basel: Birkhauser.

14.

Deeny (Arup)

, Lane (Arup)

, Hadden (University of Edinburgh) R, Lawrence (Arup) A. 2018. Fire safety design in modern timber buildings. The Structural Engineer. 96(1.

15.

Fleming

, Smith

, Ramage

MH.

2014. Measuring-up in timber: a critical perspective on mid- and high-rise timber building design. Architectural Research Quarterly. doi:10.1017/S1359135514000268.

16.

Forest Europe . 2015. State of Europe's Forests. http://foresteurope.org/state-europes-forests-2015-report/ accessed May 2018.

17.

Giesekam

2018. The role of timber in meeting carbon targets. http://woodknowledge.wales/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Jannik_Giesekam_slides_140618-1.pdf, accessed June 2019.

18.

Hairstans

2018. Mass timber, an introduction to solid laminate timber systems. Edinburgh: Arcamedia.

19.

Hebel

, Heisel

2017. Cultivated building materials, industrialized natural resources for architecture and construction. Basel: Birkhauser.

20.

Huber

, Ekevad

, Girhammer

, Berg

2019. Structural robustness and timber buildings – a review. Wood Material Science & Engineering. 14(2):107–128. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2018.1446052

21.

IOM3 . 2018. Timber 2018, conference papers 26–27th June 2018. London: The Wood Technology Society.

22.

Kapfinger

, Wieler

2007. Riess Wood³ Modulare Holzbausysteme. Vienna: Springer.

23.

MHCLG . 2013. Approved document A: structure. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/429060/BR_PDF_AD_A_2013.pdf, accessed December 2019.

24.

MHCLG . 2019. Modern methods of construction: introducing the MMC definition framework, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-methods-of-construction-working-group-developing-a-definition-framework, accessed June 2019.

25.

Ramage

, 2017. The wood for the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 68(Part 1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107 .

26.

Schickhofer

, Ganster

, Sieder

, Ringhofer

, Zimmer

14 November 2019. Actual research activities, applications and future prospects for CLT. Stockholm, Sweden: Clarion Hotel Sign.

27.

Waugh

, Heinz

, Wells

2009. A process revealed, the Stadhaus. London: Fuel Publishing.

28.

Waugh Thistelton Architects . 2018. 100 Projects UK CLT. https://www.thinkwood.com/clt100book accessed September 2018.