IML-Resi PD-400 drilling tools (IML System GmbH, Wiesloch, Germany) were used to study the influence of the feed rate and the rotational frequency of the drill bit on the drilling resistance (DR) measurements. The study presents theoretical aspects concerning chip formation, kinematics (speeds, cutting angles, chip thickness) and cutting forces distribution during the drilling process. Drill bit rotational frequency and feed rate have an impact on nominal chip thickness or a feed rate per major cutting edge of the drill bit, and were correlated to DR measurements. Varied rotational frequency and feed rate had a significant impact on DR and feeding resistance (FR). Positive correlations between feed rate per major cutting edge and DR (FR) for the individually tested wood species can be described by allometric functions (R2 = 0.93–0.99). Wood density had a partial impact on correlations between feed rate per major cutting edge and DR (FR).
AcuñaL, BasterraLA, CasadoMM, LópezG, Ramon-CuetoG, ReleaE, MartínezC, GonzálezA.2011. Application of resistograph to obtain the density and to differentiate wood species. Mater Construcc. 61(303):451–464. doi: 10.3989/mc.2010.57610
2.
AllisonRB, WangX.2015. Nondestructive testing in the urban forest. In: RossR.J., editor. Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood. 2nd edn.Madison, WI: Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-238 USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab; p. 77–86.
3.
AmalickiiVV, SanevVI.1992. Oborudovanie i instrument derevoobrabatyvayushchih predpriyatij [Equipment and tools for woodworking enterprises]. Moscow: Ekologiya [Ecology].
BouffierL, CharlotC, RaffinA, RozenbergP, KremerA.2008. Can wood density be efficiently selected at early stage in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)?Ann For Sci. 65(1):106–106. doi: 10.1051/forest:2007078
6.
CeraldiC, MormoneV, Russo-ErmolliE.2001. Resistographic inspection of ancient timber structures for the evaluation of mechanical characteristics. Mater Struct. 34:59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02482201
7.
ChantreG, RozenbergP.1997. Can drill resistance profiles (Resistograph) lead to within-profile and within-ring density parameters in Douglas-fir wood?Proceedings of CTIA – International Union of Forestry Research Organizations (IUFRO) International Wood Quality Workshop: Timber Management Toward Wood Quality and End-Product Value, Forintek Canada Corp., Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada, p. 41–47.
8.
CownDJ.1978. Comparison of the pilodyn and torsiometer methods for the rapid assessment of wood density in living trees. NZ J For Sci. 8:384–391.
9.
DescampsT, Van ParysL, DatoussaidS.2005. Non destructive tests for wood properties determination. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, May 2–4, 2005, University of Applied Science, Eberswalde, Germany, p. 151–158.
10.
DeshevoiMA.1934. Mekhanicheskaya tekhnologiya dereva. Ch. I [Mechanical technology of wood. Part I], Kubuch, Leningrad.
11.
DownesGM, LausbergM, PottsBM, PilbeamDL, BirdM, BradshawB.2018. Application of the IML Resistograph to the infield assessment of basic density in plantation eucalypts. Austral For. doi:10.1080/00049158.2018.1500676
12.
EcksteinD, SaßU.1994. Measurements of drill resistance on broadleaved trees and their anatomical interpretation. Holz Roh Werkst. 52:279–286. doi: 10.1007/BF02621413
13.
FaggianoB, GrippaMR, MarzoA, MazzolaniFM.2011. Experimental study for non-destructive mechanical evaluation of ancient chestnut timber. J Civil Struct Health Monit. 1:103–112. doi: 10.1007/s13349-011-0011-y
14.
FrühwaldK, HasenstabA, OsterlohK.2011. Detection of fungal damage of wood in early stages using drilling cores and drilling resistance compared to non-destructive testing methods; 16–17 June 2011. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Structural Health Assessment of Timber Structures (SHATIS’ 11); Lab. Nacional de Engenharia Civil or LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal.
15.
GaoS, WangX, WiemannMC, BrashawBK, RossRJ, WangL.2017. Ann For Sci. 74:27. doi:10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4.
16.
GlebovIT.2001. Rezanie drevesiny [Wood cutting]. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skij gosudarstvennyj lesotekhnicheskij universitet [Ural State Forest Engineering University].
17.
GullerB, GullerA, KazazG.2012. Is Resistograph an appropriate tool for the annual ring measurement of Pinus brutia?Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference and NDT Exhibition, NDE for Safety/DEFEKTOSKOPIE 2012, October 30–November 1; Seč, Czech Republic. p. 89-94; Czech Rebublic.
18.
HenriquesDF, NunesL, MachadoJS, BritoJ.2011. Timber in buildings: Estimation of some properties using Pilodin® and Resistograph®. Proceedings of the International Сonference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 12–15 April; Porto, Portugal. p. 1–8.
19.
ImposaS, MeleG, CorraoM, CocoG, BattagliaG.2014. Characterization of decay in the wooden roof of the S. Agata Church of Ragusa Ibla (Southeastern Sicily) by means of sonic tomography and resistograph penetration tests. Int J Archit Herit. 8(2):213–223. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2012.685924
JohnstoneDM, AdesPK, MooreGM, SmithIW.2007. Predicting wood decay in eucalypts using an expert system and the IML-Resistograph drill. Arboric Urb Forest. 33:76–82.
22.
KammWFG, VossS.1987. Process and device for determining the internal condition of trees or wooden components. US Patent No 4671105.
23.
KarlinasariL, DanuMI, NandikaD, TujamanM.2017. Drilling resistance method to evaluate density and hardness properties of resinous wood of agarwood (Aquilaria malaccensis). Wood Res-Slovakia. 6(5):683–690.
24.
KivimaaE.1950. Cutting force in wood-working. Helsinki: VTT Julkaisu.
25.
KloiberM, DrdáckýM, TippnerJ, HrivnákJ.2015. Conventional compressive strength parallel to the grain and mechanical resistance of wood against pin penetration and microdrilling established by in-situ semidestructive devices. Mater Struct. 48:3217. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0392-6
26.
KloiberM, TippnerJ, HrivnakJ.2014. Mechanical properties of wood examined by semi-destructive devices. Mater Struct. 47(1):199–212. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0055-z
27.
LangellaA, NeleL, MaioA.2005. A torque and thrust prediction model for drilling of composite materials. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 36(1):83–93. doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00177-0
28.
LazarM-B.2012. Cutting force modelling for drilling of fiber-reinforced composites [Doctoral dissertation]. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
29.
LinCJ, WangSY, LinFC, ChiuCM.2003. Effect of moisture content on the drill resistance value in Taiwania plantation wood. Wood Fiber Sci. 35(2):234–238.
30.
LourencoPB, FeioAO, MachadoJS.2007. Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: non-destructive correlations for test results in new and old wood. Constr Build Mater. 21:1617–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.011
31.
LyubchenkoVI.2004. Rezanie drevesiny i drevesnykh materialov [Cutting wood and wood materials]. Moscow: Moscow State Forest University.
32.
MäkipääR, LinkosaloT.2011. A non-destructive field method for measuring wood density of decaying logs. Silva Fenn. 45(5):1135–1142. doi: 10.14214/sf.91
33.
MattheckC, BethgeK, AlbrechtW.1997. How to read the results of resistograph M. Arboric J. 21(4):331–346. doi: 10.1080/03071375.1997.9747179
34.
Morales-CondeMJ, Rodríguez-LiñánC, Saporiti-MachadoJ.2014. Predicting the density of structural timber members in service. The combine use of wood cores and drill resistance data. Mater Construcc. 64(315). doi:10.3989/mc.2014.03113
35.
NuttoL, BiecheleT.2015. Drilling resistance measurement and the effect of shaft friction – using feed force information for improving decay identification on hard tropical wood. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL – GTR – 239. Proceedings of the 19th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, 22–25 September 2015, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, p. 154–161.
36.
OliveiraJTS, WangX, VidaurreGB.2017. Assessing specific gravity of young Eucalyptus plantation trees using a resistance drilling technique. Holzforschung. 71(2):137–145. doi: 10.1515/hf-2016-0058
37.
Orozco-AguilarL, NitschkeCR, LivesleySJ, BrackC, JohnstoneD.2018. Testing the accuracy of resistance drilling to assess tree growth rate and the relationship to past climatic conditions. Urban For Urban Gree. 36:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.010
38.
OxfordCJJr. 1955. On the drilling of metals – I. basic mechanics of the process. J Manuf Sci E–T ASME. 77:103–114.
39.
ParkCY, KimSJ, LeeJJ.2006. Evaluation of specific gravity in post member by drilling resistance test. Mokchae Konghak. 34(2):1–9.
40.
RiggioM, AnthonyRW, AugelliF, KasalB, LechnerT, MullerW, TannertT.2014. In situ assessment of structural timber using non-destructive techniques. Mater Struct. 47:749–766. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0093-6
41.
RinnF.1996. Resistographic visualization of tree ring density variations. Proceedings of the International Conference Tree Rings and environment, Tucson, AZ, USA, Radiocarbon, p. 871–878.
42.
RinnF.2012. Basics of micro-resistance drilling for timber inspection. Holztechnologie. 53(3):24–28.
43.
RinnF.2016. Intact-decay transitions in profiles of density-calibratable resistance drilling devices using long thin needles. Arboric J. 38(4):204–217. doi: 10.1080/03071375.2016.1228336
44.
RinnF, SchweingruberF-H, ScharE.1996. Resistograph and X-ray density charts of wood comparative evaluation of drill resistance profiles and X-ray density charts of different wood species. Holzforschung. 50(4):303–311. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1996.50.4.303
45.
SharapovE, BrischkeC, MilitzH, SmirnovaE.2018a. Combined effect of wood moisture content, drill bit rotational speed and feed rate on drilling resistance measurements in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Wood Mater Sci Eng. doi:10.1080/17480272.2018.1557249
46.
SharapovE, BrischkeC, MilitzH, SmirnovaE.2018b. Effects of white rot and brown rot decay on the drilling resistance measurements in wood. Holzforschung. 72(10):905–913. doi: 10.1515/hf-2017-0204
47.
SharapovE, SmirnovaE, ToropovA.2018c. Comparative analysis of drilling tools for wood properties evaluation by the drilling resistance measurements. News of the Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy. 225:188–201. doi:10.21266/2079-4304.2018.225.188-201.
48.
SharapovE, WangX, SmirnovaE.2017. Drill bit friction and its effect on resistance drilling measurements in logs. Proceedings of the 20th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, 12–15 September 2017, USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI, p. 405–415.
49.
SharapovE, WangX, SmirnovaE, WackerJP.2018d. Wear behavior of drill bits in wood drilling resistance measurements. Wood Fiber Sci. 50:154–166. doi: 10.22382/wfs-2018-017
50.
TannertT, AnthonyRW, KasalB, KloiberM, PiazzaM, RiggioM, RinnF, WidmannR, YamaguchiN.2014. In-situ assessment of structural timber using semi-destructive techniques. Mater Struct. 47:767–785. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0094-5
51.
UkrainetzNK, O'NeillGA.2010. An analysis of sensitivities contributing measurement error to Resistograph values. Can J Forest Res. 40(4):806–811. doi: 10.1139/X10-019
52.
VössingKJ, NiederleithingerE.2018. Nondestructive assessment and imaging methods for internal inspection of timber. A review. Holzforschung. 72(6):467–476. doi: 10.1515/hf-2017-0122
53.
WalterITG, NortonB, LaveryDJ, ChapmanMJ.2005. Screw ingress torque as a non-destructive determinant of timber compressive strength. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, May 2–4, 2005, University of Applied Science, Eberswalde, Germany, p. 145–155.
54.
WangX, AllsionRB.2008. Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resisatnce microdrilling. Arboric Urb Forest. 34:1–4.
55.
WangS-Y, ChiuC-M, LinC-J.2003. Application of the drilling resistance method for annual ring characteristics: evaluation of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomeribides) trees grown with different thinning and pruning treatments. J Wood Sci. 49(2):116–124. doi: 10.1007/s100860300018
56.
WangSY, LinCJ.2001. Application of the drill resistance method for density boundary evaluation of earlywood and latewood of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides Hay.) plantation wood. Taiwan J For Sci. 16:197–200.
57.
ZhangH, ZhuL, SunY, WangX, YanH.2011. Determining modulus of elasticity of ancient structural timber. Adv Mater Res-Switz. 217–218:407–412. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.217-218.407
58.
ZhaoH, EhmannKF.2003. Mechanistic model for spade drills for wood drilling operations, Part 1: model development. J Manuf Sci Eng. 125(2):226–235. doi: 10.1115/1.1559156
