This study investigates the effect of three different multimodal transport combinations for cross laminated timber (CLT) supply on global warming potential and freight costs from cradle to the construction site gate. It attempts to demonstrate to what extent a local approach could be beneficial, both environmentally and economically. It was found that emissions during the transportation modules will be more than those from the manufacturing stages in the case of intercontinental routes, contrary to the environment-friendly idea usually associated with timber products. Also, the results showed that it is crucial to locate CLT manufacturing facilities as close as possible to wood supply sources, in order to reduce the freight costs of low value-added products.
BörjessonP, GustavssonL.2000. Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energ Pol. 28:575–588. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00049-5
BribiánIZ, CapillaAV, UsónAA.2011. Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ. 46:1133–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002
4.
BuchananAH, HoneyBG.1994. Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction. Energy Build. 20:205–217. doi: 10.1016/0378-7788(94)90024-8
5.
Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit. ÖKOBAUDAT [Internet]. Berlin; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 23]. pp. 1–1. Available from: http://www.oekobaudat.de/de.html.
6.
ColeRJ.1998. Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Build Environ. 34:335–348. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00020-1
7.
DodooA, GustavssonL, SathreR.2014. Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low-energy multi-storey timber building systems. Energy Build. 82:194–210. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.034
FredrikssonM, BomarkP, BromanO, GronlundA.2015. A trapeze edging method for cross laminated timber production. In: HernándezR, CáceresC, editors. Proceedings of 22nd international wood machining seminar, Quebec: Centre de Recherche sur les Matériaux Renouvelables, Université laval; p. 323–332.
12.
FuerstF, ShimizuC.2016. Green luxury goods? The economics of eco-labels in the Japanese housing market. J Japanese Int Economics. Elsevier Inc; 39:108–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2016.01.003
13.
FujiwaraT, NodaH, ShimaseT, TachibanaS, TakahashiT.2005. Energy consumption through timber transportation and the WOODMILES. The World Sustainable Building Conference; Tokyo;1171–1178.
14.
GustavssonL, SathreR.2006. Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Build Environ. 41:940–951. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.008
15.
HanY, ParkJ-H, ChangY-S, ParkY, OhJ-K, HongJ-P, LeeJ-J, YeoH.2016. The effect of controlling the drying distortion of laminas on the production yield of cross-laminated timber (CLT) using Larix kaempferi wood. Eur J Wood Prod. 74:519–526. doi: 10.1007/s00107-016-1008-3
16.
IkagaT, MurakamiS, KatoS, ShiraishiY.2002. Forecast of CO2 emissions from construction and operation of buildings in Japan up to 2050. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 1:149–156. doi: 10.3130/jaabe.1.2_149
JeongG-Y, LeeJ-J, YeoH-M, HongJ-P, KimH-K, SoW-T, ChungW-Y.2013. Optimized lamina size maximizing yield for cross laminated timber using domestic trees. J Korean Wood Sci Technol. 41:141–148. doi: 10.5658/WOOD.2013.41.2.141
20.
Jyukankyo Research Institute Inc. 2014. 家庭用エネルギー統計年報 2012 年版 [Household energy statistics annual report 2012 edition] [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001064005.pdf.
Ministry of the Environment. 2016. Overview of the plan for global warming countermeasures [Internet]. Tokyo; 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 6]. pp. 1–8. Available from: https://www.env.go.jp/press/files/en/676.pdf.
28.
MurakamiS, LevineMD, YoshinoH, InoueT, IkagaT, ShimodaY, MiuraS, SeraT, NishioM, SakamotoY, FujisakiW.2009. Overview of energy consumption and GHG mitigation technologies in the building sector of Japan. Energy Efficiency. 2:179–194. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9040-8
29.
NässénJ, HedenusF, KarlssonS, HolmbergJ.2012. Concrete vs. wood in buildings – an energy system approach. Build Environ. Elsevier Ltd; 51:361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.011
30.
PetersenAK, SolbergB.2002. Greenhouse gas emissions, life-cycle inventory and cost-efficiency of using laminated wood instead of steel construction. Case: beams at Gardermoen airport. Environ Sci Policy. 5:169–182. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00044-2
31.
PetersenAK, SolbergB.2005. Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. For Policy Econ. 7:249–259. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00063-7
32.
RobertsonAB, LamFCF, ColeRJ.2012. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives: laminated timber or reinforced concrete. Build. 2:245–270. doi: 10.3390/buildings2030245
33.
SchadeW, DollC, MaibachM, PeterM, CrespoF, CarvalhoD, CaiadoG, ContiM, LilicoA, AfrazN.2006. COMPETE final report: analysis of the contribution of transport policies to the competitiveness of the EU economy and comparison with the United States. 2nd ed. Karlsruhe, Germany: European Commission – DG TREN; p. 1–195.
TakanoA, HughesM, PittauF, HafnerA, OttS, HughesM, De AngelisE.2014. Greenhouse gas emission from construction stage of wooden buildings. J Int Wood Prod. 5:217–223. doi: 10.1179/2042645314Y.0000000077
36.
TakanoA, PalSK, KuittinenM, AlanneK, HughesM, WinterS.2015. The effect of material selection on life cycle energy balance: a case study on a hypothetical building model in Finland. Build Environ. 89:192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.001
37.
Technical Committee CEN/TC 350. 2012. DIN en 15978: 2-12-10 sustainability of construction works. EN 15978. 2012 ed. Brussels. pp. 1–62.
38.
Technical Committee CEN/TC 350. 2014. DIN EN 15804:2012+A1:2013 sustainability of construction works. 2012 ed. Brussels; 2014. pp. 1–67. Report No.: EN 15814.
YoshidaJ, SugiuraA.2015. The effects of multiple green factors on condominium prices. J Real Estate Finan Econ. 50:412–437. doi: 10.1007/s11146-014-9462-3
