Through content analysis of the three broadcast networks and two leading cable news channels, this study's authors (1) examine how promotional content fits into the overall lineup of the morning news shows, (2) evaluate ownership patterns as they relate to this content, and (3) examine the policy implications of news decisions related to promotional content. The study identifies clear differences in the practices of the broadcast versus cable morning news programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderA.OwensJ.CarvethR. (1993). Media economics: Theory and practice.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2.
AltschullJ. H. (1995). Agents of power: The media and public policy (2nd ed.).White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
3.
BaeH.Product differentiation in national TV newscasts: A comparison of the cable allnews networks and the broadcast networks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 62–77. (2000).
4.
BagdikianB. H. (2004). The new media monopoly (7th ed.).Boston: Beacon Press.
5.
BagdikianB. H. (1983). The media monopoly.Boston: Beacon Press.
6.
BakerW. F.Masters of the media. The Washington Post, p. A21. (2002, March 12).
7.
BaldwinT.BarrettM.BatesB.Influence of cable on television news audiences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(3), 651–658. (1992).
8.
ChristiansC.NordenstrengK.Social responsibility worldwide. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19(1), 3–28. (2004).
9.
ClearyJ.Adams-BloomT.The family business: Entertainment products and the morning news shows. Mass Communication & Society, 12(1), 1–19. (2009, forthcoming).
10.
Columbia Journalism Review. (2004). Who owns what? Retrieved March 3, 2007, from www.CJR.org/tools/owners/
11.
GoodaleG.Now a word from our sponsors. The Christian Science Monitor, p. 12. (2004, August 27).
12.
GrosheckJ.Homogenous agendas, disparate frames: CNN and CNN International coverage online. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 52–68. (2008).
13.
GunaratneS. A. (1998). Old wine in a new bottle: Public journalism, developmental journalism, and social responsibility. In RoloffM. E., Communication yearbook 21 (pp. 227–321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
HamiltonJ. T. (2004). All the news that's fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
HanksD.The best experts money can buy. The Miami Herald, p. E1. (2007, October 7).
16.
Hartford Courant Can Couric lead the news at CBS?Gainesville Sun, p. 2A. (2005, December 2)
17.
HermanE. S.ChomskyN. (1998). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media.New York: Pantheon Books.
JohnsonP.Morning shows have ducks in a predictable row: Post-Couric ‘Today’ expected to stay on top. USA Today, p. 7D. (2006, September 11).
20.
JohnsonP.A new day for CNN's ‘American Morning’: Anchors change but format won't. USA Today, p.3D. (2007, April 9).
21.
JungJ. (2001). The influence of media ownership on news coverage: A case of CNN's coverage of movies. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, August 6, 2001, Washington, D. C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 459 505).
22.
KaplanM.The local in local TV is in danger. The Christian Science Monitor, p. 11. (2003, June 2).
23.
KunkelT.The sound of silence. American Journalism Review, 4. (2003, December/January).
24.
KurtzH.AhrensF.Family's TV clout in Bush's corner: Sinclair orders 62 stations to air anti-Kerry film. The Washington Post, p. A 01. (2004, Ocotber 12).
25.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. (1977).
26.
LeeT.HwangF. H.Journalistic ideologies versus corporate interests: How Time and Warner's merger influences Time's content. Communication Research Reports, 21(2), 188–196. (2004).
27.
LichterS. R.NoyesR. E. (1995). Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
LloydS.A criticism of social responsibility theory: An ethical perspective. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 6(4), 199–209. (1991).
29.
McAllisterM. P.Television news plugola and the last episode ofSeinfeld. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 383–401. (2002).
30.
McAllisterM.TurowJ.New media and the commercial sphere: Two intersecting trends, five categories of concern. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(4), 505–514. (2002).
31.
McQuailD. (2005). McQuail's mass communication theory (5th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
MerrillJ. (1974). The imperative of freedom.New York: Hastings House.
33.
MindichD. T. Z. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don't follow the news.New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
NeroneJ. C.. (1995). Last rights: Revisiting four theories of the press.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
NeuendorfK. (2002). The content analysis guidebook.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
PauleyJ. (executive producer). (2005, June 12). CNN's Larry King Live [Television broadcast].New York: CNN.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.New York: Simon and Schuster.
42.
PuzzangheraJFCC lawyer says TV study was hushed. Los Angeles Times, p. 3. (2006, September 15).
43.
RiffeD.LacyS.FicoF. G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed.).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
RiversR.Ruling bad news for divergent views. The Denver Post, p. B-07. (2003, June 6).
45.
ShoemakerP.ReeseS.. (1995). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.).New York: Longman.
46.
SiebertF. S.PetersonT. B.SchrammW. (1956). Four theories of the press.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
47.
SingerJ. B.The socially responsible existentialist: A normative emphasis for journalists in a new media environment. Journalism Studies, 7(1), 2–18. (2006).
48.
StempelG.Gatekeeping: The mix of topics and the selection of stories. Journalism Quarterly, 62(4), 791–796. (1985).
49.
StempelG.Topic and story choice of five network newscasts. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 750–752. (1988).
50.
WhittemoreH. (1990). CNN: The inside story.Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
51.
WilliamsD.Synergy bias: Conglomerates and promotion in the news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(3), 453–72. (2002).
52.
WoodM. L. M.NelsonM. R.ChoJ.YarosR. A.Tonight's top story: Commercial content in television news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 807–822. (2005).
