The composite materials are fabricated by combining various ingredients to make higher material properties as required by various industries. The primary classification of composites is based on their build ingredients, such as binder, fibre, reinforcement and fillers. The characteristics of individual ingredients influenced the properties of composites. Further, friction materials are those composite materials efficiently used in vehicles’ braking. Researchers have tried the various formulations of friction materials because it is very significant to study the mechanism and material characteristics due to the safety measures of vehicles. The current study examines the various brake composite materials’ characteristics and their mechanical and tribological performance in this article. The tribological study includes the various terminologies used in friction and wear using pin-on-disc, dynamometer, field studies, etc. The effects of numerous elements impacting the wear of frictional materials are given, and the tribological performances of used friction materials are given the utmost attention.
MenapaceC, LeonardiM, MatějkaV, . Dry sliding behavior and friction layer formation in copper-free barite containing friction materials. Wear. 2018;398–399:191–200.
2.
RajJS, ChristyTV, GnanarajSD, . Influence of calcium sulfate whiskers on the tribological characteristics of automotive brake friction materials. Eng Sci Techn Int J. 2020;23(2):445–451.
3.
BlauPJ, McLaughlinJC.Effects of water films and sliding speed on the frictional behavior of truck disc brake materials. Tribol Int. 2003;36(10):709–715.
4.
ChangYH, Soo JooB, LeeSM, . Size effect of tire rubber particles on tribological properties of brake friction materials. Wear. 2018;394:80–86.
MarinE, DaimonE, BoschettoF, . Diagnostic spectroscopic tools for worn brake pad materials: a case study. Wear. 2019;432:202969.
7.
SzymańskiP, Czarnecka-KomorowskaD, GawdzińskaK, . A review of composite materials used in brake disc pad manufacturing process. Compos Theor Pract. 2020;20.
8.
KumarVV, Senthil KumaranS, DhanalakshmiS, . Tribological performance evaluation of fused mullite-reinforced hybrid composite brake pad for defence application. J. Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2019;41(4):1–10.
9.
DaiE, LiG, LuG, . Tribological behavior and wear mechanism of Cu/CF/phenolic resin sandwich composites under current. J Ind Text. 2020: 1528083720966697.
10.
PadhanM, MaratheU, BijweJ.Surface topography modification, film transfer and wear mechanism for fibre reinforced polymer composites – an overview. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop. 2020.
11.
AllenLP, BaezJ, SternMEC, . Trends and the economic effect of asbestos bans and decline in asbestos consumption and production worldwide. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):531.
12.
OrnaMary VirginiaCarotenoids, cochineal, and copper: food coloring through the ages. In Chemistry's role in food production and sustainability: past and present, American Chemical Society, 2019, p. 85–109.
13.
GweonJH, Soo JooB, JangH.The effect of short glass fiber dispersion on the friction and vibration of brake friction materials. Wear. 2016;362-363:61–67.
14.
MahaleV, BijweJ, SinhaS.Efforts towards green friction materials. Tribol Int. 2019;136:196–206.
15.
SaindaneUV, SoniS, MenghaniJV.Recent research status on modern friction materials-an overview. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng; 2020. 810(1): 012067. IOP Publishing,
16.
HeX, YangK, JiX, . Research on vehicle stability control strategy based on integrated-electro-hydraulic brake system. No. 2017-01-1565. SAE Technical Paper, 2017.
17.
AnselmaPG, PatilSP, BelingardiG.Rapid optimal design of a light vehicle hydraulic brake system. No. 2019-01-0831. SAE Technical Paper, 2019.
18.
SharmaRC, DhingraM, PathakRK.Networking-human area network. Int J Eng Res Techn. 2015;04(1):206–213.
19.
QiangZHU, YiLU, BinGUO, . Model of output pressure for Air brake system in passenger car. Chinese Hydr Pneum. 2015;02:27.
20.
ChopraV.Design and FE analysis of a permanent-magnet synchronizer brake. No. 2017-01-2455. SAE Technical Paper, 2017.
21.
Anantha KrishnaGL, Sathish KumarKM.Investigation on eddy current braking systems – a review. In Applied mechanics and materials, vol. 592; Trans Tech Publications; 2014. p. 1089–1093.
22.
WahlströmJ, LeonardiM, TuM, . A study of the effect of brake pad scorching on tribology and airborne particle emissions. Atmosphere (Basel). 2020;11(5):488.
23.
WaliaMS.Towards enhanced mechanical braking systems for trains. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2017.
24.
ChowdaryVL, Nageswara RaoNA. Design & analysis of a disc brake using Fea. IJCER Online.
25.
BhaneAB, SalodkarSM, RamaniHB.Braking system approaching towards the betterment and it's consequences. Int Res J Advan Sci Hub. 2020;2:64–70.
26.
BelhocineA, Abu BakarAR, BouchetaraM.Thermal and structural analysis of disc brake assembly during single stop braking event. Aust J. Mech Eng. 2016;14(1):26–38.
27.
BandieraM, MauriA, BestettiM, . Corrosion phenomena in braking systems. In CORROSION 2020. OnePetro, 2020.
28.
VontorováJ, MohylaP.Use of GDOES method for evaluation of the quality and thickness of hot dip galvanised coating. Trans IMF. 2018;96(6):313–318.
29.
ShenX, LuL, ZengD.Fatigue failure analysis of high strength bolts used for high-speed railway vehicle braking discs. Eng Fail Anal. 2020;115:104661.
30.
TowojuOA. Braking pattern impact on brake fade in an automobile brake system. 2019.
31.
RadhakrishnanC, YokeswaranK, VengadeshprasadhM, . Design and analysis of disc brake with titanium alloy. Int J Innov Sci Eng Techn. 2015;2(5):1044–1050.
32.
BorawskiA.Conventional and unconventional materials used in the production of brake pads–review. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2020;27(1):374–396.
33.
BashirM, QayoumA, SaleemSS.Influence of lignocellulosic banana fiber on the thermal stability of brake pad material. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(11):115551.
34.
ManoharanS, VijayR, SingaraveluDL, . Experimental investigation on the tribo-thermal properties of brake friction materials containing various forms of graphite: a comparative study. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(2):1459–1473.
35.
KumarVV, Senthil KumaranS.Friction material composite: types of brake friction material formulations and effects of various ingredients on brake performance – a review. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(8):0082005.
36.
AhmadijokaniF, ShojaeiA, DordanihaghighiS, . Effects of hybrid carbon-aramid fiber on performance of non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Wear. 2020;452-453:203280.
37.
YelleDJ, RalphJ.Characterizing phenol–formaldehyde adhesive cure chemistry within the wood cell wall. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;70:26–36.
38.
ChengY, SuiG, LiuH, . Preparation of highly phenol substituted bio-oil-phenol-formaldehyde adhesives with enhanced bonding performance using furfural as crosslinking agent. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136(4):46995.
SinghT, PatnaikA.Performance assessment of lapinus–aramid based brake pad hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2015;15(1):151–161.
41.
ÖsterleW, DmitrievAI.The role of solid lubricants for brake friction materials. Lubricants. 2016;4(1):5.
42.
CumberlidgeP.Lubrication of propulsion systems and gearboxes. Encyclop Marit Offshore En. 2017: 1–8.
43.
MasottiD, FerreiraN, NeisP, . Evaluation of creep groan phenomena of brake Pad materials using different abrasive particles. No. 2014-01-2518. SAE Technical Paper, 2014.
44.
SinghT, KumarN, GrewalJS, . Natural fiber reinforced non-asbestos brake friction composites: influence of ramie fiber on physico-mechanical and tribological properties. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(11):115701.
45.
MaulanaIT, SurojoE, MuhayatN, . Frictional characteristics of friction brake material using Cantala fibers as reinforcement. Tribol Online. 2018;13(4):188–194.
46.
PrabhuTR, VarmaVK, VedantamS.Tribological and mechanical behavior of multilayer Cu/SiC + Gr hybrid composites for brake friction material applications. Wear. 2014;317(1-2):201–212.
47.
AliMKA, XianjunH.M50 matrix sintered with nanoscale solid lubricants shows enhanced self-lubricating properties under dry sliding at different temperatures. Tribol Lett. 2019;67(3):1–16.
48.
ShindeD, BulsaraM, MistryKN.Tribological performance of non-asbestos brake friction material in contact with brake disc of varying topography. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2020.
49.
VijayR, SingaraveluDL.Tribological characterization of different mesh-sized natural barite-based copper-free brake friction composites. In Tribology of polymer composites. Elsevier, 2021, p. 279–300.
50.
GawandeSH, BanaitAS, BalashowryK.Study on wear analysis of substitute automotive brake pad materials. Aust J Mech Eng. 2020: 1–10.
51.
VijayR, ManoharanS, NagarajanS.Influence of premixed dual metal sulfides on the tribological performance of copper-free brake friction materials. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2020.
52.
IdrisUD, AigbodionVS, AbubakarIJ, . Eco-friendly asbestos free brake-pad: using banana peels. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci. 2015;27(2):185–192.
53.
KrishnanGS, KumarS, SureshG, . Role of metal composite alloys in non-asbestos brake friction materials – a solution for copper replacement. Mater Today Proc. 2020.
54.
WangD, YinJ, ZhuZ, . Preparation of high friction brake shoe material and its tribological behaviors during emergency braking in ultra-deep coal mine hoist. Wear. 2020;458-459:203391.
55.
KimS-H, ShimW, KwonS-U, . The impact of composition in Non-steel and low-steel type friction materials on airborne brake wear particulate emission. Tribol Lett. 2020;68(4):1–13.
56.
TomarBS, AliS, EllisK, . A comparative study on-dynamometer performance evaluation of fly ash containing non ferrous organic and low-metallic disc brake pads for passenger vehicles and thereby promoting a very cheap inorganic filler available in abundance. No. 2020-01-1613. SAE Technical Paper, 2020.
57.
DurowayeS, SekunowoO, LawalG.Physical and mechanical characterisation of asbestos-free particulate ceramic matrix composites. Eskişehir Techn Univ J Sci Techn A Appl Sci Eng; 21(4):562–574.
58.
WangX, BaoJ, LiuJ, . Preparation and optimization of a soft magnetic brake friction material based on permalloy additive. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2021.
59.
Van RensselarJ.Stop it!. Tribol Lubr Tech. 2014;70(6):46.
60.
GadowR, WeichandP, JiménezM.Process technology, applications and thermal resistivity of basalt fiber reinforced SiOC composites. Ceramics. 2019;2(2):298–307.
61.
ValieiM. Improving tribological and mechanical properties of copper-based friction materials for brake pad applications, 2020.
62.
ÖsterleW, DeutschC, GradtT, . Tribological screening tests for the selection of raw materials for automotive brake pad formulations. Tribol Int. 2014;73:148–155.
63.
GrigoratosT, MartiniG.Brake wear particle emissions: a review. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2015;22(4):2491–2504.
64.
SweetGA, BrochuM, HexemerRL, . Consolidation of aluminum-based metal matrix composites via spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;648:123–133.
65.
VigithraR, HariharanS, TamilselvanM, . Comparative study and analysis of brake shoe lining using composite material by Ansys14. Young. 2018;185(185):186.
66.
WangF, LiuY.Mechanical and tribological properties of ceramic-matrix friction materials with steel fiber and mullite fiber. Mater Des. 2014;57:449–455.
67.
KinnunenH, HebbinkG, PetersH, . An investigation into the effect of fine lactose particles on the fluidization behaviour and aerosolization performance of carrier-based dry powder inhaler formulations. Aaps Pharmscitech. 2014;15(4):898–909.
68.
NeisPD, FerreiraNF, Da SilvaFP.Comparison between methods for measuring wear in brake friction materials. Wear. 2014;319(1-2):191–199.
69.
SinghT, PatnaikA, ChauhanR.Optimization of tribological properties of cement kiln dust-filled brake pad using grey relation analysis. Mater Des. 2016;89:1335–1342.
70.
FanS, YangC, HeL, . Progress of ceramic matrix composites brake materials for aircraft application. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2016;44:313–325.
71.
YevtushenkoAA, GrzesP, AdamowiczA.The temperature mode of the carbon-carbon multi-disc brake in the view of the interrelations of its operating characteristics. Mater (Basel). 2020;13(8):1878.
72.
CaiY, FanS, YinX, . Microstructures and mechanical properties of three-dimensional ceramic filler modified carbon/carbon composites. Ceram Int. 2014;40(1):399–408.
73.
SinghT, TiwariA, PatnaikA, . Influence of wollastonite shape and amount on tribo-performance of non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Wear. 2017;386-387:157–164.
74.
ManoharanS, Sai KrishnanG, Ganesh BabuL, . Synergistic effect of red mud-iron sulfide particles on fade-recovery characteristics of non-asbestos organic brake friction composites. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(10):105311.
75.
LiewKW, NirmalU.Frictional performance evaluation of newly designed brake pad materials. Mater Des. 2013;48:25–33.
76.
SinghT, PatnaikA, ChauhanR.Performance assessment of phenolic-based Non-asbestos organic brake friction composite materials with different abrasives. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2020;17(5).
77.
ThiyagarajanV, KalaichelvanK, VijayR, . Influence of thermal conductivity and thermal stability on the fade and recovery characteristics of non-asbestos semi-metallic disc brake pad. J Brazil Soc Mechan Sci Eng. 2016;38(4):1207–1219.
78.
VijayR, SingaraveluDL, JayaganthanR.Development and characterization of stainless steel fiber-based copper-free brake liner formulation: a positive solution for steel fiber replacement. Friction. 2019: 1–25.
79.
MahaleV, BijweJ, SinhaS.A step towards replacing copper in brake-pads by using stainless steel swarf. Wear. 2019;424-425:133–142.
80.
SathickbashaK, SelvakumarAS, Sai BalajiMA, . Tribo performance of brake friction composite with stainless steel fiber. In Advances in materials and metallurgy, Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 159–169.
81.
SugÖzÜB, BehcetD. Friction and wear of automotive brake lining materials containing steel wool.
82.
SinhaA, IschiaG, MenapaceC, . Experimental characterization protocols for wear products from disc brake materials. Atmosphere (Basel). 2020;11(10):1102.
83.
YanarH, PurcekG, AyarHH. Effect of steel fiber addition on the mechanical and tribological behavior of the composite brake pad materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng; 2020.
84.
LessingJ, MorinSA, KeplingerC, . Stretchable conductive composites based on metal wools for use as electrical vias in soft devices. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(9):1418–1425.
85.
StraffeliniG, CiudinR, CiottiA, . Present knowledge and perspectives on the role of copper in brake materials and related environmental issues: A critical assessment. Environ Pollut. 2015;207:211–219.
86.
WeiL, ChoyYS, CheungCS, . Tribology performance, airborne particle emissions and brake squeal noise of copper-free friction materials. Wear. 2020;448-449:203215.
87.
AhmedKA, Rasool MohideenS, BalajiMAS, . Tribological performance of brass powder with different copper and zinc content in the brake pad. Tribol Indus. 2020;42(2).
88.
PengT, YanQ, LiG, . The influence of Cu/Fe ratio on the tribological behavior of brake friction materials. Tribol Lett. 2018;66(1):1–12.
89.
KumarKN, SumanKNS.Review of brake friction materials for future development. J Mech Mech Eng. 2017;3:1–29.
90.
ChenB, YangJ, ZhangQ, . Tribological properties of copper-based composites with copper coated NbSe2 and CNT. Mater Des. 2015;75:24–31.
91.
ZhangP, ZhangL, FuK, . Fade behaviour of copper-based brake pad during cyclic emergency braking at high speed and overload condition. Wear. 2019;428-429:10–23.
92.
SuL, GaoF, HanX, . Effect of copper powder third body on tribological property of copper-based friction materials. Tribol Int. 2015;90:420–425.
93.
ZanonM, RampinI, MartinezAM, . “Development of iron-based alloys for copper-free organic brake pads.” In European congress and exhibition on powder metallurgy. European PM conference proceedings, pp. 1–6. The European Powder Metallurgy Association, 2016.
94.
SuL, GaoF, HanX, . Tribological behavior of copper–graphite powder third body on copper-based friction materials. Tribol Lett. 2015;60(2):1–12.
IlankoAK, VijayaraghavanS.Wear behavior of asbestos-free eco-friendly composites for automobile brake materials. Friction. 2016;4(2):144–152.
105.
ReddyPV, Saikumar ReddyRV, Rajendra PrasadP, . Evaluation of mechanical and wear performances of natural fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Nat Fibres. 2022;19(6):2218–2231.
106.
ChaudharyV, Kumar BajpaiP, MaheshwariS.An investigation on wear and dynamic mechanical behavior of jute/hemp/flax reinforced composites and its hybrids for tribological applications. Fibers and Polymers. 2018;19:403–415.
107.
KrishnanGS, Ganesh BabuL, KumaranP, . Investigation of Caryota urens fibers on physical, chemical, mechanical and tribological properties for brake pad applications. Mater Res Express. 2020;7(1):0015310.
108.
KrishnanGS, JayakumariLS, BabuLG, . Investigation on the physical, mechanical and tribological properties of areca sheath fibers for brake pad applications. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(8):0085109.
109.
RajeshkumarG.A New study on tribological performance of phoenix Sp. fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Nat Fibres. 2021;18(12):2208–2219.
110.
RajeshkumarG.Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment on dry sliding wear behavior of Phoenix sp. fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Ind Text. 2022;51(2_suppl):2819S–2834S.
111.
AkpanEI, WetzelB, FriedrichK.A fully biobased tribology material based on acrylic resin and short wood fibres. Tribol Int. 2018;120:381–390.
112.
SatikbašaK, SelvakumarAS, SalB, . Effect of steel family fibers on friction and stiction behavior of brake pads. FME Trans. 2019;47(4):856–864.
113.
WangJ, LinM, XuZ, . Microstructure and mechanical properties of C/C–SiC composites fabricated by a rapid processing method. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2009;29(14):3091–3097.
114.
PanaitescuI, KochT, ArchodoulakiV-M.Accelerated aging of a glass fiber/polyurethane composite for automotive applications. Polym Test. 2019;74:245–256.
115.
ZhangX, LiK-Z, LiH-J, . Tribological and mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced paper-based composite friction material. Tribol Int. 2014;69:156–167.
OuY, ZhuD.Tensile behavior of glass fiber reinforced composite at different strain rates and temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2015;96:648–656.
118.
BakloutiM, CristolA-L, DesplanquesY, . Impact of the glass fibers addition on tribological behavior and braking performances of organic matrix composites for brake lining. Wear. 2015;330:507–514.
119.
ManjunathM, RenukappaNM, SureshaB.Influence of micro and nanofillers on mechanical properties of pultruded unidirectional glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite systems. J Compos Mater. 2016;50(8):1109–1121.
120.
MaruthiBH, GuruprasadHL, KumarY.Transient thermal and structural analysis of rotor disc of disk brake. Ind J. Sci Res. 2014;5(2):81.
121.
PaninSV, KornienkoLA, HuangQ, . Effect of adhesion on mechanical and tribological properties of glass fiber composites, based on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene powders with various initial particle sizes. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(7):1602.
122.
TangC, DangA, LiT, . Influence of fiber content on C/C-SiC brake materials fabricated by compression molding and hot sintering. Tribol Int. 2019;136:404–411.
123.
ZhangP, ZhangL, WuP, . Effect of carbon fiber on the braking performance of copper-based brake pad under continuous high-energy braking conditions. Wear. 2020;458-459:203408.
124.
GadowR, JiménezM.Carbon fiber-reinforced carbon composites for aircraft brakes. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 2019;98:28–34.
125.
WuS, LiuY, GeY, . Structural transformation of carbon/carbon composites for aircraft brake pairs in the braking process. Tribol Int. 2016;102:497–506.
126.
Byeong-ChoonG, In-SikC.Microstructural analysis and wear performance of carbon-fiber-reinforced SiC composite for brake pads. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(7):701.
127.
FanS, SunH, MaX, . Microstructure and properties of a new structure-function integrated C/C-SiC brake material. J Alloys Compd. 2018;769:239–249.
128.
FeiJ, WangH-K, HuangJ-F, . Effects of carbon fiber length on the tribological properties of paper-based friction materials. Tribol Int. 2014;72:179–186.
129.
HaoM, LuoR, HouZ, . Effect of fiber-types on the braking performances of carbon/carbon composites. Wear. 2014;319(1-2):145–149.
130.
BraierHA.Petroleum. Metals in oil. Anal Chem1967;39(5):175–176.
131.
DaudMAM, BayanuddinNF, SelamatMZ, . Effect of coconut shell powder in brake friction materials. Adv. Mater. Mech. Eng. Res. 2021: 1–2.
132.
KomoriT, MiyakeS, SenooY. Brake-friction material. U.S. Patent 4,954,536, 1990. Issued September 4.
133.
BasharD-A, MadaksonPB, ManjiJ.Material selection and production of a cold-worked composite brake pad. World J Eng Pure Appl Sci. 2012;2(3):92.
134.
EgeonuD, OluahC, OkoloP.Production of eco-friendly brake pad using raw materials sourced locally in Nsukka. Int J Energy Technol Policy. 2015;5:47–54.
135.
JuanRS, KurniawanC, MarbunJ, . Mechanical properties of brake pad composite made from candlenut shell and coconut shell. J Phys Conf Ser; 2020;1428(1):0012018, IOP Publishing.
136.
JuanJ, SimamoraR, KurniawanC, . Mechanical properties of brake pad composite made from candlenut shell and coconut shell. J Phys Conf Ser, 2020; 1428(1):0012018. IOP Publishing.
137.
LaherFJ, KelleherCF. Molded brake lining. U.S. Patent 2,534,607, issued December 19, 1950.
138.
FisherJS. Friction article and method of producing same. U.S. Patent 2,072,070, issued February 23, 1937.
139.
NashGW. “Brake dressing compound and process of making same. U.S. Patent 1,639,611, issued August 16, 1927.
140.
YamashitaY, NakagawaM, IbukiM, . Friction material for making brake pads. U.S. Patent 5,266,395, issued November 30, 1993.
141.
KimuraK, GotoY, ToriiN, . Friction material for dampers and process for producing the same. U.S. Patent 5,830,566, issued November 3, 1998.
142.
LangerW.Sustainability of aggregates in construction. In: Sustainability of construction materials, Woodhead Publishing; 2016. p. 181–207.
143.
LongleyJW, GardnerR.Some compositional effects in the static and dynamic properties of commercial vehicle disk brakes. ImechE. 1988;C453/88:31–38.
144.
KaufmanER, GregoryRB, ShainesA. Friction lining material. U.S. Patent 4,388,423, issued June 14, 1983.
145.
KaufmanER, BensonGR, ShainesA. Process for molding a brake lining friction product. U.S. Patent 4,432,922, issued February 21, 1984.
146.
RheeSK, KwolekJP. Sponge iron friction material. U.S. Patent 3,835,118, issued September 10, 1974.
147.
BijweJ.Composites as friction materials: recent developments in non-asbestos fiber reinforced friction materials? a review. Polym Compos. 1997;18(3):378–396.
148.
SatapathyBK, BijweJ.Analysis of simultaneous influence of operating variables on abrasive wear of phenolic composites. Wear. 2002;253(7-8):787–794.
149.
CaiP, WangY, WangT, . Improving tribological behaviors of friction material by mullite. Tribol Int. 2016;93:282–288.
150.
JiZ, LuoW, ZhouK, . Effects of the shapes and dimensions of mullite whisker on the friction and wear behaviors of resin-based friction materials. Wear. 2018;406-407:118–125.
151.
BianG, WuH.Friction and surface fracture of a silicon carbide ceramic brake disc tested against a steel pad. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2015;35(14):3797–3807.
152.
SadagopanP, NatarajanHK, KumarP.Study of silicon carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composite brake rotor for motorcycle application. Int J. Adv Manufact Techn. 2018;94(1):1461–1475.
153.
ZhaoX, OuyangJ, YangH, . Effect of basalt fibers for reinforcing resin-based brake composites. Minerals. 2020;10(6):490.
154.
SatapathyBK, BijweJ.Wear data analysis of friction materials to investigate the simultaneous influence of operating parameters and compositions. Wear. 2004;256(7-8):797–804.
155.
HorthF-J. Stabilizing friction levels. U.S. Patent 5,972,090, issued October 26, 1999.
156.
FilipP, WeissZ, RafajaD.On friction layer formation in polymer matrix composite materials for brake applications. Wear. 2002;252(3-4):189–198.
157.
BowdenFP, GreenwoodJH, ImaiM.Lubrication at high temperature of refractory solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1968;304(1477):157–169.
158.
VijayR, SingaraveluDL, FilipP.Influence of molybdenum disulfide particle size on friction and wear characteristics of non-asbestos-based copper-free brake friction composites. Surf Rev Lett. 2020;27(01):1950085.
159.
JangH, LeeJS, FashJW.Compositional effects of the brake friction material on creep groan phenomena. Wear. 2001;251(1-12):1477–1483.
160.
LeeWK, RheeTH, KimHS, . Effects of antimony trisulfide (Sb2S3) on sliding friction of automotive brake friction materials. Met Mater Int. 2013;19(5):1101–1107.
161.
VasconcellosMAZ, HinrichsR, Da CunhaJBM, . Mössbauer spectroscopy characterization of automotive brake disc and polymer matrix composite (PMC) pad surfaces. Wear. 2010;268(5-6):715–720.
162.
FedorchenkoIM.Antifriction and friction cermet materials. Powder Metall Met Ceram. 2002;41(9):489–497.
163.
KellerEC. Friction elements. U.S. Patent 3,477,983, issued November 11, 1969.
164.
AntonyrajJ, VijayR.Influence of WS2/SnS2 on the tribological performance of copper-free brake pads. Ind Lubr Tribol. 2019.
165.
Laguna-CamachoJR, Juárez-MoralesG, Calderón-RamónC, . A study of the wear mechanisms of disk and shoe brake pads. Eng Fail Anal. 2015;56:348–359.
166.
RazoDAS, DecrockJ, OpsommerA, . Promaxon® D in NAO Non steel disc Pad formulations: the importance in the third body layer and its effect on brake noise. SAE Int J Mater Manufact. 2016;9(1):158–170.
167.
SellamiA, KchaouM, ElleuchR, . Study of the interaction between microstructure, mechanical and tribo-performance of a commercial brake lining material. Mater Des. 2014;59:84–93.
168.
RodriguesACP, ÖsterleW, GradtT, . Impact of copper nanoparticles on tribofilm formation determined by pin-on-disc tests with powder supply: addition of artificial third body consisting of Fe3O4, Cu and graphite. Tribol Int. 2017;110:103–112.
169.
RajendranR, RavikumarN, TamilarasanTR.Sliding wear and friction studies of disc/Pad materials. No. 2018-01-0840. SAE Technical Paper, 2018.
YingLIU. Low power total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: a review, 2015.
172.
PauletteL, ManT, WeindorfDC, . Rapid assessment of soil and contaminant variability via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: Copşa Mică, Romania. Geoderma. 2015;243-244:130–140.
173.
TrojekT, TrojkováD.Uncertainty of quantitative X-ray fluorescence micro-analysis of metallic artifacts caused by their curved shapes. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(3):1133.
174.
HulskotteJHJ, RoskamGD, Van Der GonHD.Elemental composition of current automotive braking materials and derived air emission factors. Atmos Environ2014;99:436–445.
175.
VermaPC, MenapaceL, BonfantiA, . Braking pad-disc system: wear mechanisms and formation of wear fragments. Wear. 2015;322-323:251–258.
176.
VermaPC, CiudinR, BonfantiA, . Role of the friction layer in the high-temperature pin-on-disc study of a brake material. Wear. 2016;346-347:56–65.
177.
AlemaniM, GialanellaS, StraffeliniG, . Dry sliding of a low steel friction material against cast iron at different loads: characterization of the friction layer and wear debris. Wear. 2017;376-377:1450–1459.
178.
NogueiraAPG, LeonardiM, StraffeliniG, . Sliding behavior and particle emissions of Cu-free friction materials with different contents of phenolic resin. Tribol Trans. 2020;63(4):770–779.
179.
SathishkumarTP.Tribological behaviors of glass fiber with fillers reinforced hybrid polymer composites. Synth Tribol Appl Hybrid Mater. 2018: 12.
180.
LyuY, LeonardiM, WahlströmJ, . Friction, wear and airborne particle emission from Cu-free brake materials. Tribol Int. 2020;141:105959.
181.
MalachovaK, KukutschovaJ, RybkovaZ, . Toxicity and mutagenicity of low-metallic automotive brake pad materials. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf2016;131:37–44.
182.
XuPG, HarjoS, OjimaM, . High stereographic resolution texture and residual stress evaluation using time-of-flight neutron diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr. 2018;51(3):746–760.
183.
IvankinaTI, Yu ZelI, LokajicekT, . “Elastic anisotropy of layered rocks: texture-based theoretical predictions (effective media modeling) versus ultrasonic measurements of gneiss.” In 52nd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association, 2018.
184.
DengG, GuoP, RenW, . The magnetic structures and transitions of a potential multiferroic orthoferrite ErFeO3. J Appl Phys. 2015;117(16):164105.
185.
MenapaceC, LeonardiM, SecchiM, . Thermal behavior of a phenolic resin for brake pad manufacturing. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(3):759–766.
186.
PerriconeG, MatějkaV, AlemaniM, . A concept for reducing PM10 emissions for car brakes by 50%. Wear. 2018;396:135–145.
187.
MenapaceC, ManciniA, FedericiM, . Characterization of airborne wear debris produced by brake pads pressed against HVOF-coated discs. Friction. 2019: 1–12.
188.
DeepikaK, BhaskarRC, RamanaRD.Fabrication and performance evaluation of a composite material for wear resistance application. Int J Eng Sci Innov Techn (IJESIT). 2013;2(6):1–6.
189.
RajanBS, BalajiMAS, SathickbashaK, . Influence of binder on thermomechanical and tribological performance in brake Pad. Tribol Ind. 2018;40(4).
190.
ChungJO, GoSR, KimJH, . Effect of MoS2 on transfer film formation and friction coefficients in NAO friction material. Ind Lubric Tribol. 2019.
191.
NohHJ, JangH.Friction instability induced by iron and iron oxides on friction material surface. Wear. 2018;400-401:93–99.
192.
YinY, BaoJ, YangL.Wear performance and its online monitoring of the semimetal brake lining for automobiles. Indus Lubric Tribol. 2014.
193.
CaiP, WangY, WangT, . Effect of resins on thermal, mechanical and tribological properties of friction materials. Tribol Int. 2015;87:1–10.
194.
StraffeliniG, MainesL.The relationship between wear of semimetallic friction materials and pearlitic cast iron in dry sliding. Wear. 2013;307(1-2):75–80.
195.
FedericiM, GialanellaS, LeonardiM, . A preliminary investigation on the use of the pin-on-disc test to simulate off-brake friction and wear characteristics of friction materials. Wear. 2018;410-411:202–209.
196.
DmitrievAI, ÖsterleW.Modelling the sliding behaviour of tribofilms forming during automotive braking: impact of loading parameters and property range of constituents. Tribol Lett. 2014;53(1):337–351.
197.
NeisPD, FerreiraNF, FeketeG, . Towards a better understanding of the structures existing on the surface of brake pads. Tribol Int. 2017;105:135–147.
198.
ÖsterleW, DmitrievAI.Functionality of conventional brake friction materials – perceptions from findings observed at different length scales. Wear. 2011;271(9-10):2198–2207.
199.
NogueiraAPG, BagolanP, LeonardiM, . The role of scorching treatment on the wear and emission behavior of friction materials with and without copper. Wear. 2020;460-461:203480.
200.
VermaPC, AlemaniM, GialanellaS, . Wear debris from brake system materials: A multi-analytical characterization approach. Tribol Int. 2016;94:249–259.
201.
JooBS, JaraDC, SeoHJ, . Influences of the average molecular weight of phenolic resin and potassium titanate morphology on particulate emissions from brake linings. Wear. 2020;450:203243.
202.
CaiR, ZhangJ, NieX, . Wear mechanism evolution on brake discs for reduced wear and particulate emissions. Wear. 2020;452-453:203283.
203.
PerriconeG, WahlströmJ, OlofssonU.Towards a test stand for standardized measurements of the brake emissions. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng. 2016;230(11):1521–1528.
204.
KukutschováJ.Wear performance and wear debris of semimetallic automotive brake materials, and Peter Filip. Wear performance and wear debris of semimetallic automotive brake materials. Wear. 2010;268(1-2):86–93.
205.
Asadi AsadabadM, EskandariMJ.Transmission electron microscopy as best technique for characterization in nanotechnology. Synth React Inorg, Met-Org, Nano-Met Chem. 2015;45(3):323–326.
206.
AnjumDH.Characterization of nanomaterials with transmission electron microscopy. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng; 2016;146(1):012001. IOP Publishing.
207.
KarakizisPN, PantelisDI, FourlarisG, . Effect of SiC and TiC nanoparticle reinforcement on the microstructure, microhardness, and tensile performance of AA6082-T6 friction stir welds. Int J. Advan Manufact Techn. 2018;95(9):3823–3837.
208.
SerafiniA, LutterottiL, GrossS, . Characterization of nanograined powder samples using the Rietveld method applied to electron diffraction ring patterns. Cambridge University Press; 2017: S63–S68.
209.
KumarVV, Senthil KumaranS, DhanalakshmiS.A case study focusing on investigating the tribological performance of Cu-Sn sintered brake pad of off-high road vehicles. J Compos Mater. 2020;54(27):4299–4310.
210.
MenapaceC, LeonardiM, PerriconeG, . Pin-on-disc study of brake friction materials with ball-milled nanostructured components. Mater Des. 2017;115:287–298.
211.
DawczykJU. The effect of organic friction modifiers on ZDDP tribofilm, 2018.
212.
GhazalyNM, El-SharkawyM, AhmedI.A review of automotive brake squeal mechanisms. J Mechan Des Vib. 2014;1(1):5–9.
213.
AlemaniM, WahlströmJ, OlofssonU.On the influence of car brake system parameters on particulate matter emissions. Wear. 2018;396-397:67–74.
214.
ÖsterleW, PrietzelC, DmitrievAI.Investigation of surface film nanostructure and assessment of its impact on friction force stabilization during automotive braking. Int J Mater Res. 2010;101(5):669–675.
215.
ÖktemH, UygurI, AkıncıoğluG, . Experimental study on the performance characteristics of non-asbestos brake pads using a novel friction testing machine. Exp Tech. 2021: 1–10.
216.
Gutierrez-AyestaC, SánchezMD.Characterization by transmission electron microscopy of palladium nanoparticles obtained by thermal reduction. Microsc Microanal. 2020;26(S1):27–28.
217.
RajeshkumarS, SivapriyaD.Fungus-mediated nanoparticles: characterization and biomedical advances. In Nanoparticles in medicine, Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 185–199.
218.
RenX, ZhangX, XuR, . Analyzing energy materials by cryogenic electron microscopy. Adv Mater. 2020;32(24):1908293.
219.
CampanoC, Lopez-ExpositoP, Gonzalez-AguileraL, . In-depth characterization of the aggregation state of cellulose nanocrystals through analysis of transmission electron microscopy images. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;254:117271.
220.
CheQ, ZhangG, ZhangL, . Switching brake materials to extremely wear-resistant self-lubrication materials via tuning interface nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfac. 2018;10(22):19173–19181.
221.
FedericiM, AlemaniM, MenapaceC, . A critical comparison of dynamometer data with pin-on-disc data for the same two friction material pairs – a case study. Wear. 2019;424-425:40–47.
WesterlundK–G, JohanssonC.Emission of metals and particulate matter due to wear of brake linings in Stockholm. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2002;53.
224.
Abu-AllabanM, GilliesJA, GertlerAW, . Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles. Atmos Environ2003;37(37):5283–5293.
225.
SandersPG, XuN, DalkaTM, . Airborne brake wear debris: size distributions, composition, and a comparison of dynamometer and vehicle tests. Environ Sci Technol2003;37(18):4060–4069.
226.
QuerolX, AlastueyA, RuizCR, . Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in selected European cities. Atmos Environ2004;38(38):6547–6555.
227.
ChanDSEA, StachowiakGW.Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proc Instit Mechan Eng Part D J Automob Eng. 2004;218(9):953–966.
228.
MoslehM, BlauPJ, DumitrescuD.Characteristics and morphology of wear particles from laboratory testing of disk brake materials. Wear. 2004;256(11-12):1128–1134.
229.
HulskotteJHJ, Denier van der GonHAC, VisschedijkAJH, . Brake wear from vehicles as an important source of diffuse copper pollution. Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(1):223–231.
230.
BarlowTJ, BoulterPG, MccraeI, . Non-exhaust particulate matter emissions from road traffic: summary report. Published project report PPR231, 2007.
231.
RheeS, SharmaD, SinghSR, . An investigation of the role of wear and friction film influencing the friction coefficient of brakes: Mechanism of brake fade. No. 2020-01-1630. SAE Technical Paper, 2020.
232.
ThorpeA, HarrisonRM.Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2008;400(1-3):270–282.
233.
GietlJK, LawrenceR, ThorpeAJ, . Identification of brake wear particles and derivation of a quantitative tracer for brake dust at a major road. Atmos Environ2010;44(2):141–146.
234.
MohammadnejadA, BahramiA, GoliM, . Wear induced failure of automotive disc brakes – a case study. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(24):4214.
235.
KukutschováJ, MoravecP, TomášekV, . On airborne nano/micro-sized wear particles released from low-metallic automotive brakes. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(4):998–1006.
236.
PantP, HarrisonRM.Estimation of the contribution of road traffic emissions to particulate matter concentrations from field measurements: a review. Atmos Environ2013;77:78–97.
237.
CiudinR, VermaPC, GialanellaS, . Wit transactions on ecology and the environment. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2014;1:1423–1434.
238.
HussainS, Abdul HamidMK, Mat LazimAR, . Brake wear particle size and shape analysis of non-asbestos organic (NAO) and semi metallic brake Pad. Jurnal Teknologi. 2014;71(2).
239.
WahidSM.Automotive brake wear: a review. Envron Sci Poll Res. 2018;25(1):174–180.
240.
ZhaoJ, LewinskiN, RiedikerM.Physico-chemical characterization and oxidative reactivity evaluation of aged brake wear particles. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2015;49(2):65–74.
241.
HaginoH, OyamaM, SasakiS.Laboratory testing of airborne brake wear particle emissions using a dynamometer system under urban city driving cycles. Atmos. Environ. 2016;131:269–278.
242.
NoskoO, OlofssonU.Quantification of ultrafine airborne particulate matter generated by the wear of car brake materials. Wear. 2017;374-375:92–96.
243.
NiemannH, WinnerH, AsbachC, . Influence of disc temperature on ultrafine, fine, and coarse particle emissions of passenger Car disc brakes with organic and inorganic Pad binder materials. Atmosphere (Basel). 2020;11(10):1060.
WahlströmJ. Special issue editorial: study of brake wear particle emissions, 2020: 1359.
246.
TavangarR, MoghadamHA, KhavandiA, . Comparison of dry sliding behavior and wear mechanism of low metallic and copper-free brake pads. Tribol Int. 2020;151:106416.
247.
SarkarC, HiraniH.Frictional characteristics of brake pads using inertia brake dynamometer. Int J Curren Eng Techn. 2015;5(2):981–989.
248.
IijimaA, SatoK, YanoK, . Particle size and composition distribution analysis of automotive brake abrasion dusts for the evaluation of antimony sources of airborne particulate matter. Atmos Environ2007;41(23):4908–4919.
249.
SriwiboonM, TiempanN, KaewlobK, . Non-Asbestos organic (NAO) disc Pad wear behavior: divergence of thickness loss and weight loss. No. 2018-01-1866. SAE Technical Paper, 2018.
250.
ZaquenN, TegelsD, KerssemakersA, . Establishing a correlation between friction performance and tribolayer formation using engineered mineral fibers. J Tribol. 2021;143(10):101701.
251.
KumarS, GhoshSK.Particle emission of organic brake pad material: a review. Proc Instit Mech Eng, Part D: J Automob Eng. 2020;234(5):1213–1223.
252.
MatějkaV, MetinözI, WahlströmJ, . On the running-in of brake pads and discs for dyno bench tests. Tribol Int. 2017;115:424–431.
253.
MathissenM, GrigoratosT, LahdeT, . Brake wear particle emissions of a passenger car measured on a chassis dynamometer. Atmosphere (Basel). 2019;10(9):556.
254.
XiaoY, ZhangZ, YaoP, . Mechanical and tribological behaviors of copper metal matrix composites for brake pads used in high-speed trains. Tribol Int. 2018;119:585–592.
255.
SaikrishnanG, JayakumariLS, VijayR.Influence of iron–aluminum alloy on the tribological performance of non-asbestos brake friction materials – a solution for copper replacement. Ind Lubric Tribol. 2019.
256.
PerriconeG, MatĕjkaV, AlemaniM, . A test stand study on the volatile emissions of a passenger car brake assembly. Atmosphere (Basel). 2019;10(5):263.
257.
GramstatS, WaningerR, LugovyyD, . Investigation possibilities of brake particle emissions on a brake dynamometer. In 8th international Munich chassis symposium. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg; 2017, pp. 629–653.
258.
MamakosA, KolbeckK, ArndtM, . Particle emissions and disc temperature profiles from a commercial brake system tested on a dynamometer under real-world cycles. Atmosphere (Basel). 2021;12(3):377.
259.
MakrahyM, GhazalyN, MoaazA.Effect of compressibility of brake friction materials on vibration occurrence. Int J Transp Veh Eng. 2017;11:1782–1785.
260.
ChaiJ, ZhouZ, YeC, . Design and development of a novel sliding friction and wear tester with complex working conditions. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6903.
261.
HagenZ, FarwickFH, MathissenM, . Study of brake wear particle emissions: impact of braking and cruising conditions. Environ Sci Technol2019;53(9):5143–5150.
262.
WahlströmJ.A comparison of measured and simulated friction, wear, and particle emission of disc brakes. Tribol Int. 2015;92:503–511.
263.
WahlströmJ.A factorial design to numerically study the effects of brake pad properties on friction and wear emissions. Adv Tribol. 2016.
264.
WahlströmJ, OlofssonU.A field study of airborne particle emissions from automotive disc brakes. Proc the Inst Mechan Eng Part D J Automob Eng. 2015;229(6):747–757.
265.
ShupertLA, EbbsSD, LawrenceJ, . Dissolution of copper and iron from automotive brake pad wear debris enhances growth and accumulation by the invasive macrophyte Salvinia molesta Mitchell. Chemosphere. 2013;92(1):45–51.
266.
SandersonP, SuSS, ChangITH, . Characterisation of iron-rich atmospheric submicrometre particles in the roadside environment. Atmos Environ2016;140:167–175.
267.
KrenkelW, HeidenreichB, RenzR.C/C-SiC composites for advanced friction systems. Adv Eng Mater. 2002;4(7):427–436.
