When multiple cues are presented in compound and trained to predict an outcome, the cues may compete for association with an outcome. However, if both cues are necessary for solution of the discrimination, then competition might be expected to interfere with the solution of the discrimination. We consider how unequal stimulus salience influences learning in configural discriminations, where no individual stimulus predicts the outcome. We compared two hypotheses: (1) salience modulation minimises the initial imbalance in salience and (2) unequal stimulus salience will impair acquisition of configural discriminations. We assessed the effect of varying stimulus salience in a biconditional discrimination (AX+, AY−, BX−, BY+). Across two experiments, we found stronger discrimination when stimuli had matched, rather than mismatched, salience, supporting our second hypothesis. We discuss the implications of this finding for Mackintosh’s model of selective attention, modified elemental models and configural models of learning.
BakerA. G.MurphyR. A.MehtaR. (2003). Learned irrelevance and retrospective correlation learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 90–101.
2.
ByromN. C.MurphyR. A. (2014). Sampling capacity underlies individual differences in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 133–143.
3.
ByromN. C.MurphyR. A. (2016). Individual difference in configural associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 325–335.
4.
CouvillonP. A.BittermanM. E. (1992). A conventional conditioning analysis of ‘transitive inference’ in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 308–310.
5.
DavisH. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349.
6.
DelamaterA. R.SosaW.KatzM. (1999). Elemental and configural processes in patterning discrimination learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 97–124.
7.
GeorgeD. N.PearceJ. M. (1999). Acquired distinctiveness is controlled by stimulus relevance not correlation with reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 363–373.
8.
GeorgeD. N.PearceJ. M. (2012). A configural theory of attention and associative learning. Learning & Behavior, 40, 241–254.
9.
GonzalezS. T.WelchE. S.ColwillR. M. (2013). Pavlovian contextual and instrumental biconditional discrimination learning in mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 256, 398–404.
10.
HaddonJ. E.GeorgeD. N.GraysonL.McGowanC.HoneyR. C.KillcrossS. (2014). Extreme elemental processing in a high schizotypy population: Relation to cognitive deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 918–935.
11.
HarrisJ. A.LiveseyE. J. (2008). Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 144–154.
12.
HenleyN. M.HorsfallR. B.De SotoC. B. (1969). Goodness of figure and social structure. Psychological Review, 76, 194–204.
13.
Le PelleyM. E.McLarenI. P. (2003). Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 68–79.
14.
LezakM. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
LiveseyE. J.McLarenI. P. L. (2011). An elemental model of associative learning and memory. In PathosE. M.WillsA. J. (Eds.), Formal approaches in categorization (pp. 153–172). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LoberK.LachnitH. (2002). Configural learning in human Pavlovian conditioning: Acquisition of a biconditional discrimination. Biological Psychology, 59, 163–168.
17.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). Theory of attention: Variations in associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.
18.
MackintoshN. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186–192.
19.
MackintoshN. J.LittleL. (1969). Intradimensional and extradimensional shift learning by pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 14, 5–6.
20.
McLarenI. P. L.MackintoshN. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246.
21.
McLarenI. P. L.MackintoshN. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 177–200.
22.
MelchersK. G.ShanksD. R.LachnitH. (2008). Stimulus coding in human associative learning: Flexible representations of parts and wholes. Behavioural Processes, 77, 413–427.
23.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
PearceJ. M. (1987). A Model for Stimulus-Generalization in Pavlovian Conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73.
25.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and Discrimination: a Selective Review and a Connectionist Model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607.
26.
RescorlaR. A. (1972). ‘Configural’ conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 307–317.
27.
SaavedraM. A. (1975). Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit. Learning and Motivation, 6, 314–326.
28.
Vallee-TourangeauF. R.MurphyR. A.BakerA. G. (1998). Causal induction in the presence of a perfect negative cue: Contrasting predictions from associative and statistical models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 173–191.
29.
Von FersenL.WynneC. D.DeliusJ. D.StaddonJ. E. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.
30.
WagnerA. R. (2003.). Context-sensitive elemental theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 7–29.
31.
WagnerA. R.BrandonS. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In MowerR. R.KleinS. B. (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
WagnerA. R.RescorlaR. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In BoakesR. A.HallidayM. S. (Eds.), Inhibition and learning (pp. 301–336). London, England: Academic Press.
33.
WynneC. D. L. (1997). Pigeon transitive inference: Tests of simple accounts of a complex performance. Behavioural Processes, 39, 95–112.
34.
YuC.SmithL. B.KleinK. A.ShiffrinR. M. (2007, January). Hypothesis testing and associative learning in cross-situational word learning: Are they one and the same?Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, IN.
