Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Cues can vary in how informative they are about when specific outcomes, such as food availability, will occur. This study was an experimental investigation of the functional relation between cue informativeness and temporal discrimination in a peak-interval (PI) procedure. Each session consisted of fixed-interval (FI) 2- and 4-s schedules of food and occasional, 12-s PI trials during which pecks had no programmed consequences. Across conditions, the phi (ϕ) correlation between key light color and FI schedule value was manipulated. Red and green key lights signaled the onset of either or both FI schedules. Different colors were either predictive (ϕ = 1), moderately predictive (ϕ = 0.2-0.8) or not predictive (ϕ = 0) of a specific FI schedule. This study tested the hypothesis that temporal discrimination is a function of the momentary conditional probability of food; that is, pigeons peck the most at either 2 s or 4 s when ϕ = 1 and peck at both intervals when ϕ < 1. Response distributions were bimodal Gaussian curves; distributions from red- and green-key PI trials converged when ϕ ≤ 0.6. Peak times estimated by summed Gaussian functions, averaged across conditions and pigeons, were 1.85 and 3.87 s; however, pigeons did not always maximize the momentary probability of food. When key light color was highly correlated with FI schedules (ϕ ≥ 0.6), estimates of peak times indicated that temporal discrimination accuracy was reduced at the unlikely interval, but not the likely interval. The mechanism of this reduced temporal discrimination accuracy could be interpreted as an attentional process.

Keywords

Expectancy selective attention timing peak-interval procedure key peck pigeon

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Catania

A. C.

(1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgments. In Schoenfeld

W. N.

(Ed.), Theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 1–42). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Catania

A. C.

Reynolds

G. S.

(1968). A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 327–383. doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11–s327

Cheng

Westwood

(1993). Analysis of single trials in pigeons’ timing performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 56–67. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.19.1.56

Church

R. M.

Meck

W. H.

Gibbon

(1994). Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 135–155. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.20.2.135

Daniels

C. W.

Fox

A. E.

Kyonka

E. G. E.

Sanabria

(2015). Biasing temporal judgments in rats, pigeons, and humans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 28. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/50n6389s

Fox

A. E.

Kyonka

E. G.

(2013). Pigeon responding in fixed-interval and response-initiated fixed-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 187–197. doi:10.1002/jeab.38

Fox

A. E.

Kyonka

E. G. E.

(2014). Choice and timing in pigeons under differing food deprivation states. Behav-ioural Processes, 106, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.04.018

Fox

A. E.

Kyonka

E. G. E.

(2015). Timing in response-initiated fixed intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103, 375–392. doi:10.1002/jeab.120

Galtress

Kirkpatrick

(2009). Reward value effects on timing in the peak procedure. Learning and Motivation, 40, 109–131. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2008.05.004

10.

Gibbon

(1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279

11.

Gibbon

Church

R. M.

Meck

W. H.

(1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x

12.

Guilhardi

Church

R. M.

(2005). Dynamics of temporal discrimination. Learning and Behavior, 33, 399–416. doi:10.3758/BF03193179

13.

Killeen

P. R.

Fetterman

J. G.

(1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 274–295. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.274

14.

Kirkpatrick-Steger

Miller

S. S.

Betti

C. A.

Wasserman

E. A.

(1996). Cyclic responding by pigeons on the peak timing procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 447–460. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.22.4.447

15.

Leak

T. M.

Gibbon

(1995). Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: Implications of the scalar property. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.21.1.3

16.

Lejeune

Wearden

J. H.

(2006). Scalar properties in animal timing: Conformity and violations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1875–1908. doi:10.1080/17470210600784649

17.

Machado

(1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychological Review, 104, 241–265. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.241

18.

Machado

Malheiro

M. T.

Erlhagen

(2009). Learning to time: A perspective. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 423–458. doi:10.1901/jeab.2009.92-423

19.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi:10.1037/h0076778

20.

Richelle

Lejeune

(1980). Time in animal behaviour. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

21.

Roberts

(1981). Isolation of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 242–268. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.7.3.242

22.

Staddon

J. E. R.

(1969). Multiple fixed-interval schedules: Transient contrast and temporal inhibition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 583–590. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-583

23.

Sutherland

N. S.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

24.

Swanton

D. N.

Gooch

C. M.

Matell

M. S.

(2009). Averaging of temporal memories by rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 434–439. doi:10.1037/a0014021

25.

Terrace

H. S.

(1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1–27. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-1

26.

Wagner

A. R.

Logan

F. A.

Haberlandt

Price

(1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171–180. doi:10.1037/h0025414

27.

Wasserman

E. A.

(1974). Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 284–297. doi:10.1037/h0036872

28.

Wasserman

E. A.

(1990). Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 1, 298–302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00221.x

29.

Whitaker

Lowe

C. F.

Wearden

J. H.

(2003). Multiple-interval timing in rats: Performance on two-valued mixed fixed-interval schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 277. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.277

30.

Whitaker

Lowe

C. F.

Wearden

J. H.

(2008). When to respond? And how much?: Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components. Behavioural Processes, 77, 33–42. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.00

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

Selective attention in pigeon temporal discrimination

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material