Recent research has indicated that visual working memory capacity for unidimensional items might be boosted by focusing on all presented items, as opposed to a subset of them. However, it is not clear whether the same outcomes would be observed if more complex items were used which require feature binding, a potentially more demanding task. The current experiments, therefore, examined the effects of encoding strategy using multidimensional items in tasks that required feature binding. Effects were explored across a range of different age groups (Experiment 1) and task conditions (Experiment 2). In both experiments, participants performed significantly better when focusing on a subset of items, regardless of age or methodological variations, suggesting this is the optimal strategy to use when several multidimensional items are presented and binding is required. Implications for task interpretation and visual working memory function are discussed.
BaddeleyA.EmslieH.Nimmo-SmithI. (1992). The speed and capacity of language-processing test. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
2.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
BarchardK. A. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing does not show equivalence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15, 418–421. doi:10.1111/asap.12095
4.
BengsonJ. J.LuckS. J. (2016). Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 265–270. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0891-7
5.
BlackerK. J.CurbyK. M.KlobusickyE.CheinJ. M. (2014). Effects of action video game training on visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1992–2004. doi:10.1037/a0037556
6.
BrockmoleJ. R.LogieR. H. (2013). Age-related change in visual working memory: A study of 55,753 participants aged 8–75. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00012
7.
BrockmoleJ. R.ParraM. A.Della SalaS.LogieR. H. (2008). Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 543–547. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.543
8.
BrownL. A.NivenE. H.LogieR. H.RhodesS.AllenR. J. (2017). Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: Encoding and suffix interference effects. Memory, 25, 261–275.
9.
BruceP. R.CoyneA. C.BotwinickJ. (1982). Adult age differences in metamemory. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 354–357. doi:10.1093/geronj/37.3.354
10.
BunnellJ. K.BakenD. M.Richards-WardL. A. (1999). The effect of age on metamemory for working memory. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 28, 23–29.
11.
ChenZ.CowanN. (2013). Working memory inefficiency: Minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1449–1462. doi:10.1037/a0031790
12.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
13.
CraikF. I.McDowdJ. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474–479. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.474
14.
CrumleyJ. J.StetlerC. A.HorhotaM. (2014). Examining the relationship between subjective and objective memory performance in older adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 29, 250–263. doi:10.1037/a0035908
15.
CusackR.LehmannM.VeldsmanM.MitchellD. J. (2009). Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 641–647. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.641
16.
DevolderP. A.PressleyM. (1992). Causal attributions and strategy use in relation to memory performance differences in younger and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 629–642. doi:10.1002/acp.2350060706
17.
DonkinC.KaryA.TahirF.TaylorR. (2016). Resources masquerading as slots: Flexible allocation of visual working memory. Cognitive Psychology, 85, 30–42. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.002
18.
DunloskyJ.HertzogC. (1997). Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, P178–P186. doi:10.1093/geronb/52B.4.P178
19.
DunningD. L.HolmesJ. (2014). Does working memory training promote the use of strategies on untrained working memory tasks?Memory & Cognition, 42, 854–862. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0410-5
20.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
21.
FukudaK.VogelE.MayrU.AwhE. (2010). Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 673–679. doi:10.3758/17.5.673
22.
GathercoleS. E. (2008). Working memory in the classroom. Psychologist, 21, 382–385.
23.
GoldJ. M.HahnB.ZhangW. W.RobinsonB. M.KappenmanE. S.BeckV. M., . . . LuckS. J. (2010). Reduced capacity but spared precision and maintenance of working memory representations in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 570–577. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.65
24.
HalamishV.McGillivrayS.CastelA. D. (2011). Monitoring one’s own forgetting in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 631–635. doi:10.1037/a0022852
25.
HardmanK. O.CowanN. (2015). Remembering complex objects in visual working memory: Do capacity limits restrict objects or features?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 325–347. doi:10.1037/xlm0000031
26.
HartshorneJ. K. (2008). Visual working memory capacity and proactive interference. PLoS ONE, 3, e2716. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002716
27.
HuY.AllenR. J.BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (2016). Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 2164–2175. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1106-7
28.
HuY.HitchG. J.BaddeleyA. D.ZhangM.AllenR. J. (2014). Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: Evidence from suffix and strategy effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1665–1678. doi:10.1037/a0037163
29.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
JohnsonJ. S.HollingworthA.LuckS. J. (2008). The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 41–55. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.41
31.
KirovaA. M.BaysR. B.LagalwarS.(2015). Working memory and executive function decline across normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Research International, 2015, Article 748212. doi:10.1155/2015/748212
32.
KoriatA.BjorkR. A.ShefferL.BarS. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643
33.
KornellN.BjorkR. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: Overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 449–468. doi:10.1037/a0017350
34.
LinkeA. C.Vicente-GrabovetskyA.MitchellD. J.CusackR. (2011). Encoding strategy accounts for individual differences in change detection measures of VSTM. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.034
35.
LogieR. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240–245. doi:10.1177/0963721411415340
36.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846
37.
MoreyC. C.CowanN. (2005). When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 703–713. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.703
38.
MorrisonA. B.RosenbaumG. M.FairD.CheinJ. M. (2016). Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory. Memory & Cognition, 44, 922–936. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0608-9
39.
MulderJ.WagenmakersE. J. (2016). Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments.”Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.002
40.
OpitzB.SchneidersJ. A.KrickC. M.MecklingerA. (2014). Selective transfer of visual working memory training on Chinese character learning. Neuropsychologia, 53, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.017
PertzovY.AvidanG.ZoharyE. (2009). Accumulation of visual information across multiple fixations. Journal of Vision, 9, 2. doi:10.1167/9.10.2
43.
RabinowitzJ. C.AckermanB. P.CraikF. I.HinchleyJ. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: The roles of relatedness and imagery. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 688–695. doi:10.1093/geronj/37.6.688
44.
UenoT.AllenR. J.BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J.SaitoS. (2011). Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 12–23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0013-8
45.
VogelE. K.MachizawaM. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751. doi:10.1038/nature02447
46.
WheelerM. E.TreismanA. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.48
47.
ZacksR. T. (1982). Encoding strategies used by young and elderly adults in a keeping track task. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 203–211. doi:10.1093/geronj/37.2.203
