We studied the initial acquisition and overnight consolidation of new spoken words that resemble words in the native language (L1) or in an unfamiliar, non-native language (L2). Spanish-speaking participants learned the spoken forms of novel words in their native language (Spanish) or in a different language (Hungarian), which were paired with pictures of familiar or unfamiliar objects, or no picture. We thereby assessed, in a factorial way, the impact of existing knowledge (schema) on word learning by manipulating both semantic (familiar vs unfamiliar objects) and phonological (L1- vs L2-like novel words) familiarity. Participants were trained and tested with a 12-hr intervening period that included overnight sleep or daytime awake. Our results showed (1) benefits of sleep to recognition memory that were greater for words with L2-like phonology and (2) that learned associations with familiar but not unfamiliar pictures enhanced recognition memory for novel words. Implications for complementary systems accounts of word learning are discussed.
BakkerI.TakashimaA.van HellJ. G.JanzenG.McQueenJ. M. (2015). Tracking lexical consolidation with ERPs: Lexical and semantic-priming effects on N400 and LPC responses to newly-learned words. Neuropsychologia, 79, 33–41. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.020
2.
BalassM.NelsonJ. R.PerfettiC. A. (2010). Word learning: An ERP investigation of word experience effects on recognition and word processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 126–140. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.001
3.
BartlettF. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BirdS. (2012). Expert knowledge, distinctiveness, and levels of processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 665–689.
5.
BreitensteinC.JansenA.DeppeM.FoersterA.-F.SommerJ.WolbersT.KnechtS. (2005). Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon. NeuroImage, 25, 958–968. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019
6.
BrightP.MossH.TylerL. K. (2004). Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain and Language, 89, 417–432. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.010
7.
BrownH.GaskellM. G. (2014). The time-course of talker-specificity and lexical competition effects during word learning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1163–1179.
8.
ClayF.BowersJ. S.DavisC. J.HanleyD. A. (2007). Teaching adults new words: The role of practice and consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 970–976. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.970
9.
CraikF. I. M.LockhartR. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
10.
CunilleraT.CamaraE.LaineM.Rodríguez-FornellsA. (2010). Speech segmentation is facilitated by visual cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 260–274. doi:10.1080/17470210902888809
11.
CunilleraT.LaineM.CamaraE.Rodríguez-FornellsA. (2010). Bridging the gap between speech segmentation and word-to-world mappings: Evidence from an audiovisual statistical learning task. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 295–305. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.05.003
12.
DavisM. H.Di BettaA. M.MacdonaldM. J. E.GaskellM. G. (2009). Learning and consolidation of novel spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 803–820.
13.
DavisM. H.GaskellM. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 3773–800. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0111
14.
De KoninckJ.LorrainD.ChristG.ProulxG.CoulombreD. (1989). Intensive language learning and increases in rapid eye movement sleep: Evidence of a performance factor. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 8, 43–47. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(89)90018-4
15.
DiekelmannS.WilhelmI.BornJ. (2009). The whats and whens of sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 13, 309–321. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2008.08.002
16.
DrosopoulosS.SchulzeC.FischerS.BornJ. (2007). Sleep’s function in the spontaneous recovery and consolidation of memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 169–183.
17.
DumayN.GaskellM. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Association for Psychological Science, 18, 35–39.
18.
DumayN.GaskellM. G.FengX. (2004). A day in the life of a spoken word. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 26(26).
19.
EarleF. S.LandiN.MyersE. B. (2017). Sleep duration predicts behavioral and neural differences in adult speech sound learning. Neuroscience Letters, 636, 77–82. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.044
20.
EarleF. S.MyersE. B. (2014). Building phonetic categories: An argument for the role of sleep. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01192
21.
EarleF. S.MyersE. B. (2015a). Overnight consolidation promotes generalization across talkers in the identification of nonnative speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), EL91-EL97. doi:10.1121/1.4903918
22.
EarleF. S.MyersE. B. (2015b). Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1680–1695. doi:10.1037/xhp0000113
23.
GagnepainP.HensonR. N.DavisM. H. (2012). Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Current Biology, 22, 615–621. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.015
24.
GaskellM. G.DumayN. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89, 105–132. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00070-2
25.
GaskellM. G.WarkerJ.LindsayS.FrostR.GuestJ.SnowdonR.StackhouseA. (2014). Sleep underpins the plasticity of language production. Psychological Science, 25, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0956797614535937
26.
HawkinsE. A.AstleD. E.RastleK. (2015). Semantic advantage for learning new phonological form representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 775–786. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00730
27.
HawkinsE. A.RastleK. (2016). How does the provision of semantic information influence the lexicalization of new spoken words?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1322–1339. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1079226
28.
InostrozaM.BornJ. (2013). Sleep for preserving and transforming episodic memory. Annual Review of Neuro-science, 36, 79–102. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170429
29.
KapnoulaE. C.PackardS.GuptaP.McMurrayB. (2015). Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms. Cognition, 134, 85–99. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.007
30.
KimppaL.KujalaT.LeminenA.VainioM.ShtyrovY. (2015). Rapid and automatic speech-specific learning mechanism in human neocortex. NeuroImage, 118, 282–291. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.098
31.
KurdzielL. B. F.SpencerR. M. C. (2016). Consolidation of novel word learning in native English-speaking adults. Memory, 24, 471–481. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1019889
32.
LaineM.SalmelinR. (2010). Neurocognition of new word learning in the native tongue: Lessons from the ancient farming equipment paradigm. Language Learning, 60(s2), 25–44.
33.
LindsayS.GaskellM. G. (2010). A complementary systems account of word learning in L1 and L2. Language Learning, 60(s2), 45–63.
34.
LindsayS.GaskellM. G. (2013). Lexical integration of novel words without sleep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 608–622. doi:10.1037/a0029243
35.
LoftusG. R.MassonM. E. J. (1994). Using confidence-intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476–490.
36.
McClellandJ. L.McNaughtonB. L.O’ReillyR. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419–457. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7624455
37.
McKeanC.LettsC.HowardD. (2013). Functional reorganization in the developing lexicon: Separable and changing influences of lexical and phonological variables on children’s fast-mapping. Journal of Child Language, 40, 307–335. doi:10.1017/S0305000911000444
38.
Mestres-MisséA.CàmaraE.Rodríguez-FornellsA.RotteM.MünteT. F. (2008). Functional neuroanatomy of meaning acquisition from context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2153–2166. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20150
39.
NoraA.RenvallH.KimJ. Y.ServiceE.SalmelinR. (2015). Distinct effects of memory retrieval and articulatory preparation when learning and accessing new word forms. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–27. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126652
40.
RaaijmakersJ.PhafR. (1999). Part-List Cuing Revisited: Testing the Sampling-Bias Hypothesis. In IzawaC. (Ed.), On memory: Evolution, progress and reflection on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin model (pp. 87–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
RaschB.BornJ. (2013). About sleep’s role in memory. Physiological Reviews, 93, 681–766. doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012
42.
SnodgrassJ. G.CorwinJ. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 34–50.
43.
TakashimaA.BakkerI.van HellJ. G.JanzenG.McQueenJ. M. (2014). Richness of information about novel words influences how episodic and semantic memory networks interact during lexicalization. NeuroImage, 84, 265–278. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.023
44.
TakashimaA.BakkerI.van HellJ. G.JanzenG.McQueenJ. M. (2016). Interaction between episodic and semantic memory networks in the acquisition and consolidation of novel spoken words. Brain and Language, 167, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.009
45.
TamminenJ.DavisM. H.MerkxM.RastleK. (2012). The role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic information. Cognition, 125, 107–112. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.014
46.
TamminenJ.GaskellM. G. (2013). Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1001–1025. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.724694
47.
TamminenJ.PayneJ. D.StickgoldR.WamsleyE. J.GaskellM. G. (2010). Sleep spindle activity is associated with the integration of new memories and existing knowledge. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14356–14360. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3028-10.2010
48.
TaylorJ. S. H.RastleK.DavisM. H. (2014). Distinct neural specializations for learning to read words and name objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2128–2154. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00614
49.
TseD.LangstonR. F.KakeyamaM.BethusI.SpoonerP. A.WoodE. R.. . . MorrisR. G. M. (2007). Schemas and memory consolidation. Science, 316, 76–82. doi:10.1126/science.1135935
50.
TylerL. K.StamatakisE. A.BrightP.AcresK.AbdallahS.RoddJ. M.MossH. E. (2004). Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 351–362.
51.
van KesterenM. T. R.FernándezG.NorrisD. G.HermansE. J. (2010). Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 7550–7555. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914892107
52.
van KesterenM. T. R.RuiterD. J.FernándezG.HensonR. N. (2012). How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35, 211–219. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001
53.
WarkerJ. A. (2013). Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 96–109. Retrieved from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&;cpsidt=27061622
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
