The present experiments examined the effect of processing words for their survival value, relevance to moving and pleasantness on participants’ free recall scores in both nominal groups (non-redundant pooled individual scores) and collaborative dyads. Overall, participants recalled more words in the survival processing conditions than in the moving and pleasantness processing conditions. Furthermore, nominal groups in both the pleasantness condition (Experiment 1) and the moving and pleasantness conditions (Experiment 2) recalled more words than collaborative groups, thereby replicating the oft-observed effect of collaborative inhibition. However, processing words for their survival value appeared to eliminate the deleterious effects of collaborative remembering in both Experiments 1 and 2. These results are discussed in the context of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis and the effects of both expertise and collaborative skill on group remembering.
AslanA.BäumlK. T. (2012). Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information. Cognition, 122, 118–122. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.001
2.
BasdenB. H.BasdenD. R.BrynerS.ThomasR. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1189. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
3.
CongletonA. R.RajaramS. (2011). The influence of learning methods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 535–551. doi:10.1037/a0024308
4.
DahlströmÖ.DanielssonH.EmilssonM.AnderssonJ. (2011). Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?Memory, 19, 140–154. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.539571
5.
EkeochaJ. O.BrennanS. E. (2008). Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups. Memory, 16, 245–261. doi:10.1080/09658210701807480
6.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
HarrisC. B.BarnierA. J.SuttonJ. (2013). Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 183–195. doi:10.1037/a0028906
8.
HarrisC. B.KeilP. G.SuttonJ.BarnierA. J.McilwainD. J. (2011). We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48, 267–303. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2010.541854
9.
HarrisC. B.PatersonH. M.KempR. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?Memory, 16, 213–230. doi:10.1080/09658210701811862
10.
HirstW.EchterhoffG. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 55–79. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340
11.
KazanasS. A.AltarribaJ. (2015). The survival advantage: Underlying mechanisms and extant limitations. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 360–396. doi:10.1177/147470491501300204
12.
KelleyM. R.WrightD. B. (2010). Obtaining representative nominal groups. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 36–41. doi:10.3758/brm.42.1.36
13.
McbrideD. M.ThomasB. J.ZimmermanC. (2013). A test of the survival processing advantage in implicit and explicit memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 41, 862–871. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0304-y
14.
MeadeM. L.NokesT. J.MorrowD. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17, 39–48. doi:10.1080/09658210802524240
15.
NairneJ. S. (2005). The functionalist agenda in memory research. In HealyA. F. (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer (pp. 115–126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. (2010). Adaptive memory: Ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.005
17.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N.ThompsonS. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176–180. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02064.x
18.
NairneJ. S.ThompsonS. R.PandeiradaJ. N. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263–273. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263
19.
Nokes-MalachT. J.MeadeM. L.MorrowD. G. (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 18, 32–58. doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.642206
20.
OtgaarH.SmeetsT.BergenS. V. (2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23–28. doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.23
21.
RajaramS.Pereira-PasarinL. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649–663. doi:10.1177/1745691610388763
22.
RaymaekersL. H.OtgaarH.SmeetsT. (2013). The longevity of adaptive memory: Evidence for mnemonic advantages of survival processing 24 and 48 hours later. Memory, 22, 19–25. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.791321
23.
SavineA. C.ScullinM. K.RoedigerH. L. (2011). Survival processing of faces. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1359–1373. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0121-0
24.
SchwartzB. L.BrothersB. R. (2014). Survival processing does not improve paired- associate learning. In SchwartzB. L.HoweM. L.TogliaM. P.OtgaarH. (Eds.), What is adaptive about adaptive memory? (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
SuttonJ. (2013). Skill and collaboration in the evolution of human cognition. Biological Theory, 8, 28–36. doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0097-z
26.
Van OverscheldeJ. P.RawsonK. A.DunloskyJ. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
27.
WeinsteinY.BuggJ. M.RoedigerH. L.3rd. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes?Memory & Cognition, 36, 913–919. doi:10.3758/MC.36.5.913
28.
WeldonM. S.BellingerK. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160
