This study investigates the ability to create mental models and the role of working memory in mental model ability in the first and second language with English–Spanish bilinguals using L1 and L2 versions of the Spatial Integration Task. Participants showed effects of continuity in accuracy in L1 and L2, but only in L1 did they show effects in the reading times. In L1, working memory capacity predicted identification accuracy for discontinuous descriptions in L1, as well as reading time for the critical discontinuous sentence. In L2, accuracy was predicted by L2 reading ability only and there were no significant predictors of reading times. The findings suggest that the lack of availability of working memory resources in L2 induces participants to rely primarily on verbal abilities to create mental models.
BaguleyT.PayneS. J. (1999). Recognition memory for sentences from spatial descriptions: A test of the episodic construction trace hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 27, 962–973.
2.
BellV. A.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1998). A model theory of modal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 22, 25–51.
3.
BowerG. H.MorrowD. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44–48.
4.
BrownJ. I.FishcoV. V.HannaG. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G & H. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
5.
CalvoM. G. (2001). Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading. Memory, 9, 365–381.
6.
CarreirasM.SantamariaC. (1997). Reasoning about relations: Spatial and nonspatial problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 191–208.
7.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.BuntingM. F.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
8.
CopelandD. E.RadvanskyG. A. (2007). Aging and integrating spatial mental models. Psychology and Aging, 22, 569–579.
9.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
10.
de VegaM. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 373–385.
11.
EhrlichK.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296–306.
12.
EvansJ. St. B. T.HandleyS. J.HarperC. N. J.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1999). Reasoning about necessity and possibility: A test of the mental model theory of deduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1495–1513.
13.
GeorgeM. S.MannesS.HoffmanJ. E. (1997). Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 776–787.
14.
GoldmanL. J. (1998). Best test preparation for the CLEP Spanish. Piscataway, NJ: Research & Education Association.
15.
HammadouJ. (1991). Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 27, 38.
16.
HoribaY. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 433–473.
17.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
18.
KemboJ. A. (2001). Testing of inferencing behaviour in a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4, 77–96.
19.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KrollJ. F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
21.
LinckJ. A.OsthusP.KoethJ. T.BuntingM. F. (2013). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.
22.
LinderholmT.van den BroekP. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.
23.
McDonaldJ. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.
24.
MorraS. (1989). Developmental differences in the use of verbatim versus spatial representations in the recall of spatial descriptions: A probabilistic model and an experimental analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 37–55.
25.
RadvanskyG. A.CopelandD. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1073–1080.
26.
RadvanskyG. A.CopelandD. E. (2004a). Reasoning, integrating, inference alteration, and text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 133–141.
27.
RadvanskyG. A.CopelandD. E. (2004b). Working memory span and situation model processing. The American Journal of Psychology, 117, 191–213.
28.
RadvanskyG. A.GibsonB. S.McNerneyM. W. (2014). Working memory, situation models, and synesthesia. The American Journal of Psychology, 127, 325–342.
29.
RaiM. K.LoschkyL. C.HarrisR. J.PeckN. R.CookL. G. (2011). Effects of stress and working memory capacity on foreign language readers’ inferential processing during comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 187–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9922.2010.00592.x
30.
RedickT. S.BroadwayJ. M.MeierM. E.KuriakoseP. S.UnsworthN.KaneM. J.… EngleR. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171.
31.
RobertsM. J. (2000). Strategies in relational inference. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 1–26.
32.
SegalowitzN.HulstijnJ. (2009). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language Learning. In KrollJ. F.De GrootA. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
SchmalhoferF.GlavanovD. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
34.
ShahP.MiyakeA. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 125, 4–27.
35.
ShimizuM. (2005). Effects of a question on generating bridging inferences: L2 reading proficiency and a qualitative analysis of reading processes. Bulletin of the Chubu English Language Education Society, 34, 353–360.
36.
TurnerM. L.EngleR. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.
37.
UnsworthN.HeitzR. P.SchrockJ. C.EngleR. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
38.
WheatleyB. (1996). CALLHOME Spanish transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
39.
ZwaanR. A.RadvanskyG. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
