Previous research has demonstrated that visual working memory performance is better when visual items are allocated in both left and right visual fields than within only one hemifield. This phenomenon is called the bilateral field advantage (BFA). The BFA is thought to be driven by an enhanced probability of storage, rather than by greater precision. In the present experiments, we sought to test whether the BFA can also extend to precision when the parameters of the task are modified. Using a moderate number of to-be-remembered items and 400 ms presentation time, we found better precision in the bilateral condition than in the unilateral condition. The classic BFA was still found in the form of an enhanced probability of storage, when presentation time was 200 ms. Thus, the BFA appears to convey both enhanced precision and greater probability of storage. The BFA is most likely due to the allocation of more attentional resources, when items are presented in both left and right visual fields.
AlvarezG. A.CavanaghP. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16(8), 637–643.
2.
AlvarezG. A.CavanaghP. (2008). Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(2), 346–364.
3.
AndersonD. E.AwhE. (2012). Retracted article: The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 891–910.
4.
AndersonD. E.VogelE. K.AwhE. (2013). Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 824–835.
5.
AwhE.PashlerH. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 834–846.
6.
BartonB.EsterE. F.AwhE. (2009). Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1359–1367.
7.
BaysP. M.CatalaoR. F.HusainM. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 7.
8.
BaysP. M.GorgoraptisN.WeeN.MarshallL.HusainM. (2011). Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 11(10), 6.
9.
BaysP. M.HusainM. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources inhuman vision. Science, 321(5890), 851–854.
10.
BeckerM. W.MillerJ. R.LiuT. (2013). A severe capacity limit in the consolidation of orientation information into visual short-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 415–425.
11.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114.
12.
DelvenneJ. F. (2005). The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields. Cognition, 96(3), B79–B88.
13.
DelvenneJ.-F.HoltJ. L. (2012). Splitting attention across the two visual fields in visual short-term memory. Cognition, 122, 258–263.
14.
DelvenneJ. F.CastronovoJ.DemeyereN.HumphreysG. W. (2011). Bilateral field advantage in visual enumeration. Plos One, 6(3), e17743.
15.
DelvenneJ. F.KaddourL. A.CastronovoJ. (2011). An electrophysiological measure of visual short-term memory capacity within and across hemifields. Psychophysiology, 48(3), 333–336.
16.
FukudaK.VogelE.MayrU.AwhE. (2010). Quantity, not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(5), 673–679.
17.
FullerR. L.LuckS. J.BraunE. L.RobinsonB. M.McMahonR. P.GoldJ. M. (2009). Impaired visual working memory consolidation in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 23(1), 71–80.
18.
GaoZ.DingX.YangT.LiangJ.ShuiR. (2013). Coarse-to-fine construction for high-resolution representation in visual working memory. PloS one, 8(2).
19.
GoldJ. M.HahnB.ZhangW. W.RobinsonB. M.KappenmanE. S.BeckV. M.LuckS. J. (2010). Reduced capacity but spared precision and maintenance of working memory representations in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(6), 570–577.
20.
GorgoraptisN.CatalaoR. F.BaysP. M.HusainM. (2011). Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(23), 8502–8511.
21.
HollingworthA.LuckS. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 936–949.
22.
HoltJ. L.DelvenneJ. F. (2014). A bilateral advantage in controlling access to visual short-term memory. Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 1–7.
23.
JohnsonM. K.McMahonR. P.RobinsonB. M.HarveyA. N.HahnB.LeonardC. J.et al. (2013). The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 27(2), 220–229.
24.
JonidesJ.LewisR. L.NeeD. E.LustigC. A.BermanM. G.MooreK. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.
25.
KaratekinC.AsarnowR. F. (1998). Working memory in childhood-onset schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 80(2), 165–176.
26.
KeyesH.BradyN. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 840–847.
27.
LeeE. Y.CowanN.VogelE. K.RolanT.Valle-InclanF.HackleyS. A. (2010). Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson’s disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain, 133(9), 2677–2689.
28.
LiuT.BeckerM. W. (2013). Serial consolidation of orientation information into visual short-term memory. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1044–1050.
29.
LuckS. J. (2008). Visual short-term memory. In LuckS. J.HollingworthA. (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 43–85). New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281.
31.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 391–400.
RailoH. (2014). Bilateral and two-item advantage in subitizing. Vision Research, 103, 41–48.
34.
RobersonD.HanleyJ. R.PakH. (2009). Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 112(3), 482–487.
35.
SuchowJ. W.BradyT. F.FougnieD.AlvarezG. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 9.
36.
UmemotoA.DrewT.EsterE. F.AwhE. (2010). A bilateral advantage for storage in visual working memory. Cognition, 117(1), 69–79.
37.
VogelE. K.MachizawaM. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751.
38.
WoodmanG. F.VogelE. K. (2008). Selective storage and maintenance of an object’s features in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 223–229.
39.
YeC.ZhangL.LiuT.LiH.LiuQ. (2014). Visual working memory capacity for color is independent of representation resolution. PLoS One, 9(3), e91681.
40.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233–235.
41.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20(4), 423–428.
