The preferred viewing location in words [Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30] during reading is near the word centre. Parafoveal word length information is utilized to guide the eyes toward it. A recent study by Yan and colleagues [Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132, 181–215] demonstrated that the word’s morphological structure may also be used in saccadic targeting. The study was conducted in a morphologically rich language, Uighur. The present study aimed at replicating their main findings in another morphologically rich language, Finnish. Similarly to Yan et al., it was found that the initial fixation landed closer to the word beginning for morphologically complex than for monomorphemic words. Word frequency, saccade launch site, and word length were also found to influence the initial landing position. It is concluded that in addition to low-level factors (word length and saccade launch site), also higher level factors related to the word’s morphological structure and frequency may be utilized in saccade programming during reading.
BatesD. M. (2010). lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. New York: Springer. Prepublication version at Retrieved from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/
2.
BatesD. M.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 classes. [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
3.
BeauvillainC. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801–820.
4.
BeauvillainC.DoréK.BaudoinV. (1996). The ‘center of gravity’ of words: Evidence for an effect of the word-initial letters. Vision Research, 36, 589–603.
5.
BertramR.HyönäJ. (2007). The interplay between parafoveal preview and morphological processing in reading. In Van GompelR. P. G.FischerM. H.MurrayW. S.HillR. L. (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 391–407). Oxford: Elsevier.
6.
CalvoM. G.MeseguerF. (2002). Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical and contextual factors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 66–77.
7.
DeutschA.RaynerK. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393–421.
8.
EngbertR.KrügelA. (2010). Readers use Bayesian estimation for eye movement control. Psychological Science, 21, 366–371.
9.
FaridM.GraingerJ. (1996). How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: A comparison of French and Arabic. Brain and Language, 53, 351–368.
10.
HandC. J.MielletS.O’DonnellP. J.SerenoS. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: It depends where you’re coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1294–1313.
11.
HayJ. (2003). Causes and consequences of word structure. New York: Routledge.
12.
HayJ.BaayenR. H. (2003). Phonotactics, parsing and productivity. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15, 99–130.
HyönäJ. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers’ attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 68–81.
15.
HyönäJ.BertramR. (2011). Optimal viewing position effects in reading Finnish. Vision Research, 51, 1279–1287.
16.
HyönäJ.NiemiP.UnderwoodG. (1989). Reading long words embedded in sentences: Informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 142–152.
17.
HyönäJ.PollatsekA. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612–1627.
18.
InhoffA. W.BriihlD.SchwartzJ. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 24, 466–476.
19.
JuhaszB. J.WhiteS. J.LiversedgeS. P.RaynerK. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1560–1579.
20.
JustM.A.CarpenterP.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
21.
KlieglR.GrabnerE.RolfsM.EngbertR. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262–284.
22.
KlieglR.MassonM. E. J.RichterE. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655–681.
23.
KlieglR.NuthmannA.EngbertR. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.
24.
KlieglR.OlsonR.K.DavidsonB.J. (1983). On problems of unconfounding perceptual and language processes. In RaynerK. (Ed.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 333–343). New York: Academic Press.
25.
LaineM.VainioS.HyönäJ. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologicall complex language. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 109–135.
26.
LaineM.VirtanenP. (1999). WordMill, Lexical search program [computer software]. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
27.
McConkieG. W.KerrP. W.ReddixM. D.ZolaD. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–1118.
28.
McConkieG. W.KerrP. W.ReddixM. D.ZolaD.JacobsA. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245–253.
29.
NuthmannA.EngbertR.KlieglR. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–2217.
30.
O’ReganJ. K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501–509.
31.
O’ReganJ. K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112–117.
32.
O’ReganJ. K.Lévy-SchoenA.PynteJ.BrugaillereB. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different lengths and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250–257.
33.
RadachR.HellerD. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In KennedyA.RadachR.HellerD.PynteJ. (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165–193). Oxford: Elsevier.
34.
RaynerK. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
35.
RaynerK. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30.
36.
RaynerK.MorrisR. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 163–172.
37.
RaynerK.ReichleE. D.StroudM. J.WilliamsC. C.PollatsekA. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448–465.
38.
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Computer software]. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from URL http://www.R-project.org/
39.
SeidenbergM. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy. In ColtheartM. (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
SlatteryT.J.StaubA.RaynerK. (2012). Saccade launch site as a predictor of fixation durations in reading: Comments on Hand, Miellet, O’Donnell, and Sereno (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 251–261.
41.
UnderwoodG.ClewsS.EverattJ. (1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 39–65.
42.
VituF.McConkieG. W.KerrP.O’ReganJ. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513–3533.
43.
VituF.O’ReganJ. K.MittauM. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583–600.
44.
WhiteS. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205–223.
45.
WhiteS. J.LiversedgeS. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52–78.
46.
WickhamH. (2009). ggplot2. Elegant graphics for data analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
47.
YanM.KlieglR. (2016). CarPrice vs. CarpRice: Word boundary ambiguity influences saccade target selection during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42, 1832–1838. doi:10.1037/xlm0000276
48.
YanM.KlieglR.RichterE. M.NuthmannA.ShuH. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705–725. doi:10.1080/17470210903114858
49.
YanM.ZhouW.ShuH.YusupuR.MiaoD.KrügelA.KlieglR. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132, 181–215.
