The present experiment examined the use of parafoveally presented first-language (LI) orthographic and phonological codes during reading of second-language (L2) sentences in proficient Russian-English bilinguals. Participants read English sentences containing a Russian preview word that was replaced by the English target word when the participant’s eyes crossed an invisible boundary located before the preview word. The use of English and Russian allowed us to manipulate orthographic and phonological preview effects independently of one another. The Russian preview words overlapped with English target words in (a) orthography (ВЕЛЮР [vʲɪˈlʲʉr]–BERRY), (b) phonology (БЛАНК [blank]–BLOOD), or (c) had no orthographic or phonological overlap (КАЛАЧ [kɐˈlat͡ɕ]–BERRY; ГЖЕЛЬ [ɡʐɛlʲ]–BLOOD). The results of this study showed a clear and strong benefit of the parafoveal preview of Russian words that shared either orthography or phonology with English target words. This study is the first demonstration of cross-script orthographic and phonological parafoveal preview benefit effects. Bilinguals integrate orthographic and phonological information across eye fixations in reading, even when this information comes from different languages.
AltarribaJ.KambeG.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 875–890.
2.
AndoE.JaredD.NakayamaM.HinoY. (2014). Cross-script phonological priming with Japanese Kanji primes and English targets. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 853–870.
3.
AngeleB.SlatteryT. J.RaynerK. (2016). Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 1241–1249.
4.
AshbyJ.RaynerK. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 391–426.
5.
AshbyJ.TreimanR.KesslerB.RaynerK. (2006). Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 416–424.
6.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR.Van RijnH. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistics Data Consortium.
7.
BalotaD. A.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390.
8.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. R Package Version.
9.
ChaceK. H.RaynerK.WellA. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59(3), 209–217.
10.
DijkstraT.van HeuvenW. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.
11.
DimitropoulouM.DuñabeitiaJ. A.CarreirasM. (2011). Phonology by itself: Masked phonological priming effects with and without orthographic overlap. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 185–203.
12.
DriegheD.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 954–969.
13.
FengG.MillerK.ShuH.ZhangH. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1079–1100.
14.
FitzsimmonsG.DriegheD. (2011). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 736–741.
15.
FrissonS.BélangerN. N.RaynerK. (2014). Phonological and orthographic overlap effects in fast and masked priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1742–1767.
16.
FrissonS.RaynerK.PickeringM. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 862–877.
17.
HaighC. A.JaredD. (2007). The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 623–644.
18.
HendersonJ. M.FerreiraF.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429.
19.
JaredD.KrollJ. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words?Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 2–31.
20.
JouravlevO.JaredD. (2014). Reading Russian–English homographs in sentence contexts: Evidence from ERPs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 153–168.
21.
JouravlevO.LupkerS. J. (2014). Stress consistency and stress regularity effects in Russian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 605–619.
22.
JouravlevO.LupkerS. J. (2015). Predicting stress patterns in an unpredictable stress language: The use of non-lexical sources of evidence for stress assignment in Russian. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 944–966.
23.
JouravlevO.LupkerS. J.JaredD. (2014). Cross-language phonological activation: Evidence from masked onset priming and ERPs. Brain and Language, 134, 11–22.
24.
KupermanV.DambacherM.NuthmannA.KlieglR. (2010). The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1838–1857.
25.
LandauerT. K.FoltzP. W.LahamD. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284.
26.
LimaS. D.InhoffA. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 272–285.
27.
LyashevskayaO.SharovS. (2009). The frequency dictionary of modern Russian. Moscow: Azbukovnik.
28.
MarianV.SpiveyM. (2003). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 173–193.
29.
MielletS.SparrowL. (2004). Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading. Brain and Language, 90, 299310.
30.
NakayamaM.SearsC. R.HinoY.LupkerS. J. (2012). Cross-script phonological priming for Japanese-English bilinguals: Evidence for integrated phonological representations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1563–1583.
31.
PollatsekA.LeschM.MorrisR. K.RaynerK. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148–162.
32.
PollatsekA.TanL. H.RaynerK. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 607–633.
33.
RaynerK. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
34.
RaynerK. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211–236.
35.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movement in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
36.
RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In ColtheartM. (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 327–362). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
37.
RaynerK.SerenoS. C.LeschM. F.PollatsekA. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6, 26–32.
38.
RaynerK.SlatteryT. J.DriegheD.LiversedgeS. P. (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514–528.
SerenoS. C.RaynerK. (1992). Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 173–184.
41.
SlatteryT. J.AngeleB.RaynerK. (2011). Eye movements and display change detection during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924–1938.
42.
TimmerK.GanushchakL. Y.MitlinaY.SchillerN. O. (2014). Trial by trial: Selecting first or second language phonology of a visually masked word. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1059–1069.
43.
TsaiJ.LeeC.TzengO. J. L.HungD. L.YenN. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235–244.
44.
VeldreA.AndrewsS. (2015a). Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 586–595.
45.
VeldreA.AndrewsS. (2015b). Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers’ lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 219–32.
46.
WhiteS. J.JohnsonR. L.LiversedgeS. P.RaynerK. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261–1276.
47.
WilliamsC. C.PereaM.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1072–1082.
48.
YanM.RichterE. M.ShuH.KlieglR. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–566.
49.
ZhouH.ChenB.YangM.DunlapS. (2010). Language non-selective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2051–2066.
50.
ZhouX.Marslen-WilsonW. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579–606.
