Previous research has shown that bilinguals outperform monolinguals on a variety of tasks that have been described as involving executive functioning, but the precise mechanism for those effects or a clear definition for “executive function” is unknown. This uncertainty has led to a number of studies for which no performance difference between monolingual and bilingual adults has been detected. One approach to clarifying these issues comes from research with children showing that bilinguals were more able than their monolingual peers to perceive both interpretations of an ambiguous figure, an ability that is more tied to a conception of selective attention than to specific components of executive function. The present study extends this notion to adults by assessing their ability to see the alternative image in an ambiguous figure. Bilinguals performed this task more efficiently than monolinguals by requiring fewer cues to identify the second image. This finding has implications for the role of selective attention in performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals.
Adi-JaphaE., Berberich-ArtziJ., & LibnawiA. (2010). Cognitive flexibility in drawings of bilingual children. Child Development, 81, 1356–1366. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01477.x
2.
BialystokE., CraikF.I.M., & LukG. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240–250. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
3.
BialystokE., MartinM. M., & ViswanathanM. (2005). Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(1), 103–119. doi:10.1177/13670069050090010701
4.
BialystokE., & ShaperoD. (2005). Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science, 8, 595–604. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00451.x
5.
ChastainG., & BurnhamC. A. (1975). The first glimpse determines the perception of an ambiguous figure. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 221–224. doi:10.3758/BF03203203
6.
CostaA., HernándezM., Costa-FaidellaJ., & Sebastián-GallésN. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113(2), 135–149. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001
7.
CostaA., SantestebanM., & IvanovaI. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1057–1074. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057
8.
DuñabeitiaJ.A., HernándezJ.A., AntónE., MacizoP., EstévezA., FuentesL.J., & CarreirasM. (2014). The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited: myth or reality?Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 234–251. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000243
9.
DuncanJ. (1999). Attention. In KeilF. C. & WilsonR. A. (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 39–41). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
DunnL. M., & DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
11.
FriesenD. C., LatmanV., CalvoA., & BialystokE. (2015). Attention during visual search: The benefit of bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 693–702. doi:10.1177/1367006914534331
12.
GeorgiadesM. S., & HarrisJ. P. (1997). Biasing effects in ambiguous figures: Removal or fixation of critical features can affect perception. Visual Cognition, 4(4), 383–408. doi:10.1080/713756770
13.
GoolkasianP. (1987). Ambiguous figures: Role of context and critical features. Journal of General Psychology, 114(3), 217–228.
14.
GoolkasianP. (1991). The effect of size on the perception of ambiguous figures. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 29(2), 161–164. doi:10.3758/BF03335224
15.
GoolkasianP., & WoodberryC. (2010). Priming effects with ambiguous figures. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(1), 168–178. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.168
16.
GopnikA., & RosatiA. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations. Developmental Science, 4, 175–183. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00163
17.
GraingerJ. (1993). Visual word recognition in bilinguals. In SchreuderR. and WeltensB. (Eds), The bilingual lexicon. (pp. 11–25) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18.
GreenD. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. doi:10.1017/S1366728998000133
19.
IbrahimR., ShoshaniR., PriorA. & ShareD. (2013). Bilingualism and measures of spontaneous and reactive cognitive flexibility. Psychology, 4(7A), 1–10. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.47A001
20.
IntaitėM., KoivistoM., & RevonsuoA. (2013). Perceptual reversals of Necker stimuli during intermittent presentation with limited attentional resources. Psychophysiology, 50, 82–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01486.x
21.
IntaitėM., KoivistoM., RuksenasO., & RevonsuoA. (2010). Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness or something else?Brain and Cognition, 74, 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002
22.
KaufmanA. S., & KaufmanN. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
23.
KrollJ. F., DussiasP. E., BogulskiC. A., & Valdes KroffJ. R. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 56, pp. 229–262). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00007-8
24.
LeopoldD. A., & LogothetisN. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 254–264. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
25.
MengM., & TongF. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539–551. doi:10.1167/4.7.2
26.
MishraR. K., HilcheyM. D., SinghN., & KleinR. M. (2012). On the time course of exogenous cueing effects in bilinguals: Higher proficiency in a second language is associated with more rapid endogenous disengagement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(8), 1502–1510. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.657656
27.
MiyakeA., FriedmanN. P., EmersonM. J., WitzkiA. H., & HowerterA. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
28.
PaapK. R., & GreenbergZ. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
29.
PastukhovA., & BraunJ. (2007). Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1–17. doi:10.1167/7.10.5
30.
PelhamS. D., & AbramsL. (2014). Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 313–325. doi:10.1037/a0035224
31.
PonsF., BoschL., & LewkowiczD. J. (2015). Bilingualism modulates infants’ selective attention to the mouth of a talking face. Psychological Science, 26(4), 490–498. doi:10.1177/0956797614568320
32.
RockI., GopnickA., & HallS. (1994). Do. young children reverse ambiguous figures?Perception, 23, 635–644.
33.
Rubio-FernándezP., & GlucksbergS. (2012). Reasoning about other people's beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 211–217. doi:10.1037/a0025162
34.
Sebastián-GallésN., Albareda-CastellotB., WeikumW. M., & WerkerJ. F. (2012). A bilingual advantage in visual language discrimination in infancy. Psychological Science, 23, 994–999. doi:10.1177/0956797612436817
35.
SoveriA., LaineM., HämäläinenH., & HugdahlK. (2011). Bilingual advantage in attentional control: Evidence from the forced-attention dichotic listening paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 371–378. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000118
36.
TaoL., MarzeocováA., TaftM., AsanowiczD., & WodnieckaZ. (2011). The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: The role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(123), 1–19. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00123
37.
TsalY. (1994). Effects of attention on perception of features and figural organisation. Perception, 23(4), 441–452.
38.
TsalY., & KolbetL. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 25–37. doi:10.1080/14640748508400950
39.
VerhoefK. M. W., RoelofsA., ChwillaD. J. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1832–1843. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21291
40.
WeikumW. M., VouloumanosA., NavarraJ., Soto-FrancoS., Sebastián-GallésN., & WerkerJ. F. (2007). Visual language discrimination in infancy. Science, 316, 1159. doi:10.1126/science.1137686
41.
WimmerM. C., & DohertyM. J. (2011). The development of ambiguous figure perception. Monographs of the Society for Child Development, 76(1), 1–130. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00589.x
42.
WimmerM. C., & MarxC. (2014). Inhibitory processes in visual perception: A bilingual advantage. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 412–419. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.004
