When asked to translate utterances, people might merely make sure that their translations have the same meaning as the source, but they might also maintain aspects of sentence form across languages. We report two experiments in which English–German and German–English bilinguals (without specialist translator training) repeated German ditransitive sentences whose meaning was compatible with more than one grammatical form or translated them into English. Participants almost invariably repeated the sentences accurately, thereby retaining the grammatical structure. Importantly, Experiment 1 found that they tended to repeat grammatical form across languages. Experiment 2 included a condition with sentences that had no grammatical equivalent form in English; here participants tended to persist in the order of thematic roles. We argue that cross-linguistic structural priming plays a major role in the act of translation.
BaayenR. H., DavidsonD. J., & BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2.
BarikH. C. (1971). A description of various types of omissions, additions and errors of translation encountered in simultaneous interpretation. Meta, 16, 199–210.
3.
BatesD., MaechlerM., BolkerB., & WalkerS. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (R package version 1.1-5)
4.
BernoletS., HartsuikerR. J., & PickeringM. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931–949. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.931
5.
BernoletS., HartsuikerR. J., & PickeringM. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112, 300–317. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013
6.
BernoletS., HartsuikerR. J., & PickeringM. J. (2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.005
7.
BockJ. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
8.
BockJ. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186.
9.
BockJ. K., DellG. S., ChangF., & OnishiK. S. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.003
10.
BockJ. K., LoebellH. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
11.
BraniganH. P., PickeringM. J., & ClelandA. A. (2000a). Activation of syntactic information during language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 205–216.
12.
BraniganH. P., PickeringM. J., & ClelandA. A. (2000b). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.
13.
BrunnerT. (2008). Output beim Simultandolmetschen — Kulturtransfer, Voice-Over-Text oder was? Empirische Analyse des Dolmetschprozesses. Saarbrücken: VDM.
14.
CaiZ. G., PickeringM. J., & BraniganH. P. (2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 833–849. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009
15.
CaiZ. G., PickeringM. J., YanH., & BraniganH. P. (2011). Lexical and syntactic representations between closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 431–445. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.003
16.
ChangF., BockK., & GoldbergA. E. (2003). Can thematic roles leave traces of their places?Cognition, 90, 29–49. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9
17.
ChristoffelsI. K., & de GrootA. M. B. (2004). Components of simultaneous interpreting: Comparing interpreting with shadowing and paraphrasing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 227–240. doi:10.1017/S1366728904001609
18.
ClelandA. A., & PickeringM. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 214–230. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00060-3
19.
CostaA., MiozzoM., & CaramazzaA. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual's two lexicons compete for selection?Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365–397.
20.
DesmetT., & DeclercqM. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 610–632. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.007
21.
EskolaS. (2004). Untypical frequencies in translated language: A corpus- based study on a literary corpus of translated and non-translated Finnish. In MauranenA. & KujamäkiP. (Eds.), Translation universals. Do they exist? (pp. 83–99). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22.
FiehlerR., & WagenerP. (2005). Die Datenbank Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD) – Sammlung, Dokumentation, Archivierung und Untersuchung gesprochener Sprache als Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 6, 136–147. Retrieved from http://www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2005/px-fiehler.pdf
23.
FleischerZ., PickeringM. J., & McLeanJ. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 568–579. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000551
24.
GriesS. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365–399. doi:10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3
25.
HarrisB., & SherwoodB. (1978). Translating as an innate skill. In GerverD. & SinaikoW. H. (Eds.), Language interpretation and communication (Proceedings of the NATO Symposium on Language Interpretation and Communication, Giorgio Cini Foundation, Venice, 1977) (pp. 155–170). Oxford: Plenum.
26.
HartsuikerR. J., & BernoletS. (in press/2016). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000164
27.
HartsuikerR. J., BernoletS., SchoonbaertS., SpeybroeckS., & VanderelstD. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
28.
HartsuikerR. J., KolkH. H. J., & HuiskampP. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129–147.
29.
HartsuikerR. J., PickeringM. J., & VeltkampE. (2004). Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.
30.
HartsuikerR. J., & WestenbergC. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.
31.
HeydelM., & MurrayW. S. (2000). Conceptual effects in sentence priming: A cross-linguistic perspective. In de VincenziM. & LombardoV. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing (pp. 227–254). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
32.
IshamW. P. (1994). Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization. In LambertS. & Moser-MercerB. (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 191–211). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
33.
JaegerT. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
34.
KantolaL., & van GompelR. P. G. (2011). Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, 39, 276–290. doi:10.3758/s13421–010-0016-5
35.
KöhneJ., PickeringM. J., & BraniganH. P. (2014). The relationship between sentence meaning and word order: Evidence from structural priming in German. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 304–18. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.807855
36.
LeveltW. J. M., & KelterS. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
37.
LevinB. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
LörscherW. (2005). The Translation Process: Methods and Problems of its Investigation. Meta, 50, 597–608. Retrieved from http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/011003ar
40.
MacizoP., & BajoM. T. (2006). Reading for repetition and reading for translation: Do they involve the same processes?Cognition, 99, 1–34. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.012
41.
MaierR. M. (2011). Towards a psycholinguistic model of translation processes: Directionality in Natural Translation. In Blasco MayorM. J. & Jimenez IvarsM. A. (Eds.), Interpreting naturally, a tribute to Brian Harris (pp. 67–102). Bern: Lang.
42.
McLeanJ. F., PickeringM. J., & BraniganH. P. (2004). Lexical overlap and syntactic priming in dialogue. In TrueswellJ. C. & TanenhausM. K. (Eds.), Processing world-situated language: Bridging the language as product and language as action traditions (pp. 193–208). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
43.
MeijerP. J. A., & Fox TreeJ. A. (2003). Building syntactic structures in speaking: A bilingual exploration. Experimental Psychology, 50, 184–95. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.50.3.184
44.
ParadisM. (1994). Toward a neurolinguistic theory of simultaneous translation: The framework. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10, 319–35.
45.
ParadisM. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
46.
PickeringM. J., & BraniganH. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
47.
PickeringM. J., FerreiraV. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
48.
PotterM. C., & LombardiL. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633–654.
49.
PotterM. C., & LombardiL. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265–282.
50.
R Development Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing[Computer software manual]. Vienna: Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org (ISBN 3-900051-07-0)
51.
RuizC., ParedesN., MacizoP., & BajoM. T. (2008). Activation of lexical and syntactic target language properties in translation. Acta Psychologica, 128, 490–500. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.004
52.
SalamouraA., & WilliamsJ. N. (2006). Lexical activation of cross-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 299–307. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002641
53.
SalamouraA., & WilliamsJ. N. (2007). Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 627–660. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070348
54.
SantestebanM., PickeringM. J., & McLeanJ. F. (2010). Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 347–366. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.001
55.
SchenkeinJ. (1980). A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation. In ButterworthB. (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 21–47). London: Academic Press.
56.
SchoonbaertS., HartsuikerR. J., & PickeringM. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
57.
SeleskovitchD. (1962). L'interprétation de confèrence [Conference interpretation]. Babel, 8, 13–18.
58.
SeleskovitchD. (1976). Interpretation: A psychological approach to translating. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 92–116). New York, NY: Gardner.
59.
ShinJ. A., & ChristiansonK. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean-English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112, 175–180. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.011
60.
SpiveyM. J., & MarianV. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00151
61.
SzmrecsanyiB. (2006). Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: de Gruyter.
62.
Van HellJ. G., & de GrootA. M. B. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128, 431–451. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.010
63.
VandepitteS., & HartsuikerR. J. (2011). Metonymic language use as a student translation problem: Towards a controlled psycholinguistic investigation. In AlvstadC., HildA., & TiseliusE. (Eds.), Methods and strategies of process research: Integrative approaches in translation studies (pp. 67–92). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
64.
VasilyevaM., WaterfallH., GámezP. B., GómezL. E., BowersE., & ShimpiP. (2010). Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1047–1064. doi:10.1017/S0305000909990213
65.
VerniceM., PickeringM. J., & HartsuikerR. J. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 631–664. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.572468
66.
WeinerE. J., & LabovW. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29–58.
