This paper calls attention to design features that could enhance the helpfulness of the decision table to decision makers trying to get a better intuitive grasp of the choices facing them. The experiments reported here show that the grey scale is more facilitative than the number scale for problem comprehension as measured by the identification of dominance and the identification of non-additivity, each of which requires a view of the decision problem that is sensitive to patterns across attributes. Additional design features that could enhance the decision makers’ grasp of the choices facing them are suggested for further research.
AdamF. (2012). 20 years of decision-making decision support research published by the Journal of Decision Systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 21, 93–99. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2012.695890
2.
BenbasatI., & DexterA. S. (1985). An experimental evaluation of graphical and color-enhances information presentation. Management Science, 31, 1348–1364. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.11.1348
3.
BousfieldW. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229–240. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1953.9710088
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1975). The magic number seven after fifteen years. In KennedyA. & WilkesA. (Eds.), Studies in long term memory (pp. 3–18). NY: Wiley.
5.
BuckJ. R. (1983). Visual displays. In KantowitzB. H. & SorkinR. D. (Eds.), Human factors: Understanding people-system relationships (pp. 195–231). NY: Wiley.
GardinerP. C., & EdwardsW. (1975). Public values: Multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. In KaplanM. F. & SchwartzS. (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 1–37). NY: Academic Press.
8.
HickW. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26. doi: 10.1080/17470215208416600
9.
HorvitzE. (1995). Transmission and display of information: A decision-making perspective (Technical Report Microsoft Technical Report MSR-TR-95–13). Microsoft Research, Microsoft.
10.
HowardR. A. (1966). Decision analysis: Applied decision theory. In HertzD. B. & MeleseJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on operational research (pp. 55–71). NY: Wiley-Interscience.
11.
HuninkM. G. M., WeinsteinM. C., WittembergE., DrummondM. F., PliskinJ. S., WongJ. B., & GlasziouP. P. (2014). Decision making in health and medicine: Integrating evidence and values (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HymanR. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196. doi: 10.1037/h0056940
13.
IyengarS. S., HubermanG., & JiangW. (2004). How much choice is too much? Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In MitchellO. S. & UtkusS. (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
IyengarS. S., & LepperM. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
15.
JacobyJ., SpellerD. E., & KohnC. A. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 63–69. doi: 10.2307/3150994
16.
LichtensteinS., & SlovicP. (2006). The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
McDougaldB. R., & WogalterM. S. (2013). Facilitating pictorial comprehension with color highlighting. Applied Ergonomics,45, 1285–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.008
18.
MillerG. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two; some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
19.
MogilnerC., RudnickT., & IyengarS. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perception of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 202–215. doi: 10.1086/588698
20.
MorrinR., ForinB., & ArcherW. (1961). Information processing behavior, the role of irrelevant stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 89–96. doi: 10.1037/h0045942
21.
OlsonR. K., & AttneaveF. (1970). What variables produce similarity grouping?American Journal of Psychology, 83, 1–21. doi: 10.2307/1420852
22.
PetersE., DieckmannN., DixonA., HibbardJ. H., & MertzC. K. (2007). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 169–190. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301
23.
PhillipsK. B., PrybutokV., & PeakD. (2014). Determinants of task performance in a visual decision-making process. Journal of Decision Systems, 23, 373–387. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2014.962245
RussoJ. E. (1977). The value of unit price information. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 193–201. doi: 10.2307/3150469
26.
SchwartzB. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79–88. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79
27.
SchwartzB. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.
28.
ShahA., & WolfordG. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choice. Psychological Science, 18, 369–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x
29.
SlovicP. (1995). The construction of preference. 102nd annual convention of the American psychological association distinguished scientific contributions award address (1994, Los Angeles, California). American Psychologist, 50, 364–371. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
30.
StaceyD., BennettC. L., BarryM. J., ColN. F., EdenK. B., Holmes-RovnerM., & ThomsonR. (2011). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.
31.
StevensS. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181. doi: 10.1037/h0046162
32.
TullisT. S. (1981). An evaluation of alphanumeric, graphic, and color information displays. Human Factors, 23, 541–550.
33.
von NeumannJ., & MorgensternO. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton U. Press.
34.
WertheimerM. (1958). Principles of perceptual organization. In BeardsleeD. C. & WertheimerM. (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 115–135). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
