Reexamination of Mood-Mediation Hypothesis of Background-Music-Dependent Effects in Free Recall

Abstract

The present study reexamined the mood-mediation hypothesis for explaining background-music-dependent effects in free recall. Experiments 1 and 2 respectively examined tempo- and tonality-dependent effects in free recall, which had been used as evidence for the mood-mediation hypothesis. In Experiments 1 and 2, undergraduates (n = 75 per experiment) incidentally learned a list of 20 unrelated words presented one by one at a rate of 5 s per word and then received a 30-s delayed oral free-recall test. Throughout the study and test sessions, a piece of music was played. At the time of test, one third of the participants received the same piece of music with the same tempo or tonality as at study, one third heard a different piece with the same tempo or tonality, and one third heard a different piece with a different tempo or tonality. Note that the condition of the same piece with a different tempo or tonality was excluded. Furthermore, the number of sampled pieces of background music was increased compared with previous studies. The results showed neither tempo- nor tonality-dependent effects, but only a background-music-dependent effect. Experiment 3 (n = 40) compared the effects of background music with a verbal association task and focal music (only listening to musical selections) on the participants’ moods. The results showed that both the music tempo and tonality influenced the corresponding mood dimensions (arousal and pleasantness). These results are taken as evidence against the mood-mediation hypothesis. Theoretical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Context-dependent memory background music mood-mediation hypothesis music tempo music tonality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(2002). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. In Polk

T. A.

, & Seifert

C. M.

(Eds.), Cognitive modeling (pp. 49–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Balch

W. R.

, Bowman

, & Mohler

L. A.

(1992). Music-dependent memory in immediate and delayed word recall. Memory & Cognition, 20, 21–28.

Balch

W. R.

, & Lewis

B. S.

(1996). Music-dependent memory: The roles of tempo-change and mood mediation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1354–1363.

Balch

W. R.

, Myers

M. M.

, & Papotto

(1999). Dimensions of mood in mood-dependent memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 70–83.

Cann

, & Ross

D. A.

(1989). Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 91–102.

Clark

S. E.

, & Gronlund

S. D.

(1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37–60.

Eich

(1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 293–308.

Eich

, & Metcalfe

(1989). Mood-dependent memory for internal versus external events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 443–455.

Glenberg

A. M.

(1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95–112.

10.

Godden

, & Baddeley

(1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 6, 355–369.

11.

Hayashi

(1976). New norms of nonsense syllables. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.

12.

Hockley

W. E.

(2008). The Effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1412–1429.

13.

Isarida

, & Isarida

T. K.

(1999). Effects of contextual changes between class and intermission on episodic memory. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 69, 478–485.

14.

Isarida

, & Isarida

T. K.

(2007). Environmental context effects of background color in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1620–1629.

15.

Isarida

, & Isarida

T. K.

(2014). Environmental context-dependent memory. In Thirnton

A. J.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology research (pp. 115–151). New York: NOVA Science Publishers.

16.

Isarida

T. K.

, Isarida

, & Hayashibe

(2008). Context dependent effects of background music on the free recall of incidentally and intentionally learned words. Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 107–117.

17.

Isarida

, Sakai

, Kubota

, Koga

, Katayama

, & Isarida

T. K.

(2014). Odor-context effects in free recall after a short retention interval: A new methodology for controlling adaptation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 421–433.

18.

McKone

, & French

(2001). In what sense is implicit memory ‘episodic’? The effect of reinstating environmental context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 806–811.

19.

Mead

K. L. M.

, & Ball

L. J.

(2007). Music tonality and context-dependent recall: The influence of key change and mood mediation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 59–79.

20.

Mulligan

N. W.

(2011). Conceptual implicit memory and environmental context. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 737–744.

21.

Murdock

B. B.

(1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183–203.

22.

Murnane

, Phelps

M. P.

, & Malmberg

(1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403–415.

23.

Parker

, Dagnall

, & Coyle

(2007). Environmental context effects in conceptual explicit and implicit memory. Memory, 15, 423–434.

24.

Parker

, Gellatly

, & Waterman

(1999). The effect of environmental context manipulation on memory: Dissociation between perceptual andconceptual implicit tests. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 555–570.

25.

Raaijmakers

J. G. W.

, & Shiffrin

R. M.

(1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.

26.

Russell

J. A.

, Weiss

, & Mendelsohn

G. A.

(1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502.

27.

Sahakyan

, & Hendricks

C. M.

(2012). Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-last paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40, 844–860.

28.

Sahakyan

, & Kelley

H. E.

(2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1064–1072.

29.

Shiffrin

R. M.

, & Raaijmakers

(1992). The SAM retrieval model: A retrospective and prospective. In Healy

A. F.

, Kosslyn

S. M.

, Stephen

, & Shiffrin

R. M.

(Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 1: From learning theory to connectionist theory; Vol. 2: From learning processes to cognitive processes (pp. 69–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

30.

Shiffrin

R. M.

, & Steyvers

(1997). A model for recognition memory: REM – retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145–166.

31.

Smith

S. M.

(1985). Background music and context-dependent memory. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 591–603.

32.

Smith

S. M.

(1995). Mood is a component of mental context: Comment on Eich (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 309–310.

33.

Smith

S. M.

, Glenberg

, & Bjork

R. A.

(1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353.

34.

Smith

S. M.

, & Handy

J. D.

(2014). Effects of varied and vonstant environmental contexts on acquisition and retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1582–1593.

35.

Smith

S. M.

, & Manzano

(2010). Video context-dependent recall. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 292–301.

36.

Västfjäll

(2002). Emotion induction through music: A review of the musical mood induction procedure. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 173–211.