Previous studies showed that liberals and conservatives differ in cognitive style. Liberals are more flexible, and tolerant of complexity and novelty, whereas conservatives are more rigid, are more resistant to change, and prefer clear answers. We administered a set of compound remote associate problems, a task extensively used to differentiate problem-solving styles (via insight or analysis). Using this task, several researches have proven that self-reports, which differentiate between insight and analytic problem-solving, are reliable and are associated with two different neural circuits. In our research we found that participants self-identifying with distinct political orientations demonstrated differences in problem-solving strategy. Liberals solved significantly more problems via insight instead of in a step-by-step analytic fashion. Our findings extend previous observations that self-identified political orientations reflect differences in cognitive styles. More specifically, we show that type of political orientation is associated with problem-solving strategy. The data converge with previous neurobehavioural and cognitive studies indicating a link between cognitive style and the psychological mechanisms that mediate political beliefs.
AdolphsR., TranelD., DamasioH., & DamasioA. R. (1995). Fear and the human amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 5879–5891.
2.
Akbari ChermahiniS., & HommelB. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.007
3.
AmodioD. M., JostJ. T., MasterS. L., & YeeC. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246–1247. doi:10.1038/nn1979
4.
Aziz-ZadehL., KaplanJ. T., & IacoboniM. (2009). “Aha!”: The neural correlates of verbal insight solutions. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 908–916. doi:10.1002/hbm.20554
5.
BenjaminJ., LiL., PattersonC., GreenbergB. D., MurphyD. L., & HamerD. H. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics, 12(1), 81–84. doi:10.1038/ng0196-81
6.
BotvinickM. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366.
7.
BowdenE., & BeemanM. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9(6), 435–440.
8.
BowdenE. M., & Jung-BeemanM. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers : A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 35(4), 634–639.
9.
CaparosS., Fortier-st-pierreS., GosselinJ., BlanchetteI., & BrissonB. (2015). The tree to the left, the forest to the right : Political attitude and perceptual bias. Cognition, 134, 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.006
10.
CapraraG. V., SchwartzS., CapannaC., VecchioneM., & BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x
11.
CloningerC. R., SvrakicD. M., & PrzybeckT. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of general psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990.
12.
CornelisI., Van HielA., RoetsA., & KossowskaM. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: Evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 51–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x
13.
DollingerS. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023
14.
GilliesJ., & CampbellS. (1985). Conservatism and poetry preferences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24(3), 223–227. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00682.x
15.
GlasgowM. R., & CartierM. A. (1985). Conservatism, sensation-seeking and music preferences deportment. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(3), 395–396.
16.
GolimbetV. E., AlfimovaM. V, GritsenkoI. K., & EbsteinR. P. (2007). Relationship between dopamine system genes and extraversion and novelty seeking. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 37(6), 601–606. doi:10.1007/s11055-007-0058-8
17.
JostJ. T., & KrochikM. (2014). Chapter Five-Ideological Differences in Epistemic Motivation: Implications for Attitude Structure, Depth of Information Processing, Susceptibility to Persuasion, and Stereotyping. Advances in Motivation Science, 1, 181–231.
18.
JostJ. T., GlaserJ., KruglanskiA. W., & SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
19.
Jung-BeemanM., BowdenE. M., HabermanJ., FrymiareJ. L., Arambel-LiuS., GreenblattR., … KouniosJ. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biol, 2(4), e97.
20.
KanaiR., FeildenT., FirthC., & ReesG. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.017
21.
KarsonC. N. (1983). Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. Brain, 106(3), 643–653.
22.
KouniosJ., FleckJ. I., GreenD. L., PayneL., StevensonJ. L., BowdenE. M., & Jung-BeemanM. (2008). The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 281–291. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.013
23.
KouniosJ., FrymiareJ. L., BowdenE. M., FleckJ. I., SubramaniamK., ParrishT. B., & Jung-BeemanM. (2006). The prepared mind neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17(10), 882–890.
24.
KruglanskiA. W., & WebsterD. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263–283.
25.
LuoJ., NikiK., & PhillipsS. (2004). Neural correlates of the “Aha! reaction”. NeuroReport, 15(13), 2013–2017. doi:10.1097/00001756-200409150-00004
26.
McCraeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological bulletin, 120(13), 323–337.
27.
MetcalfeJ., & WiebeD. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 238–246.
28.
MondakJ. J., & HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.
29.
MüllerJ., DreisbachG., GoschkeT., HenschT., LeschK.-P., & BrockeB. (2007). Dopamine and cognitive control: the prospect of monetary gains influences the balance between flexibility and stability in a set-shifting paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(12), 3661–3668. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05949.x
30.
RobinsonJ. P., ShaverP. R., & WrightsmanL. S. (1999). Measures of political attitudes, (Vol. 2). San Diego: Academic.
31.
SalviC., BricoloE., BowdenE., KouniosJ., & BeemanM. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than those achieved by analysis. Thinking and Reasoning. doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798
32.
SalviC., BricoloE., FranconeriS., KouniosJ., & BeemanM. (2015). Sudden insight is associated with shutting down visual inputs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0
SettleJ. E., DawesC. T., ChristakisN. A., & FowlerJ. H. (2010). Friendships Moderate an Association Between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1189–1198. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000617
35.
SternbergR. J., & DavidsonJ. E. (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36.
SubramaniamK., KouniosJ., ParrishT. B., & Jung-BeemanM. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–432. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21057.
37.
TomitakaM., TomitakaS. I., OtukaY., KimK., MatukiH., SakamotoK., & TanakaA. (1999). Association between novelty seeking and dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) exon III polymorphism in Japanese subjects. American journal of medical genetics, 88(5), 469–471.
38.
TrapnellP. D. (1994). Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 273–290. doi:10.1002/per.2410080405
39.
UedaY., TominagaA., KajimuraS., & NomuraM. (2015). Spontaneous eye blinks during creative task correlate with divergent processing. Psychological Research, doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0665-x.
40.
Van HielA., KossowskaM., & MervieldeI. (2000). The relationship between Openness to Experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 741–751. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00135-X
41.
Van HolsteinM., AartsE., van der SchaafM. E., GeurtsD. E. M., VerkesR. J., FrankeB., … CoolsR. (2011). Human cognitive flexibility depends on dopamine D2 receptor signaling. Psychopharmacology, 218(3), 567–578. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2340-2
42.
WiesbeckG. A., MauererC., ThomeJ., JakobF., & BoeningJ. (1995). Neuroendocrine support for a relationship between “novelty seeking” and dopaminergic function in alcohol-dependent men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 20(7), 755–761.
43.
WilsonG. D., AusmanJ., & MathewsT. R. (1973). Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 286–288. doi:10.1037/h0033972
44.
ZamboniG., GozziM., KruegerF., DuhamelJ. R., SiriguA., & GrafmanJ. (2009). Individualism, conservatism, and radicalism as criteria for processing political beliefs: A parametric fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 367–383.
