We investigated whether prosocial and nonsocial word primes prior to action observation modify subsequent initiation and execution of the observer's own reach-to-grasp actions. Participants observed a model performing exaggeratedly curved (vertical deviation) or natural straight reaches to a vertical dowel and always performed a straight reach to a dowel themselves. Observing curved movements slowed initiation times and increased the vertical deviation of the participants’ movements. Observing curved movements enhanced vertical deviation only in the prosocial word primes condition. We suggest that social context priming can modulate initiation of movement as well as the extent of motor contagion (in this case, the extent of vertical deviation) between model and observer.
BachP., PeatfieldN. A., & TipperS. P. (2007). Focusing on body sites: The role of spatial attention in action perception. Experimental Brain Research, 178(4), 509–517. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0756-4
2.
BaylissA. P., di PellegrinoG., & TipperS. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 631–650.
3.
BertenthalB. I., LongoM. R., & KosobudA. (2006). Imitative Response tendencies Following Observation of Intransitive Actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 210–225. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.210
4.
BrassM., BekkeringH., PrinzW. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1), 3–22. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X
5.
ChengY., LeeP., YangC., LinC., HungD., & DecetyJ. (2008). Gender differences in the Mu rhythm of the human mirror-neuron system. PLoS ONE, 3(5), e2113. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000211348
6.
CookJ. L., & BirdG. (2012). Atypical social modulation of imitation in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(6), 1045–1051. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1341-7
7.
CraikF. I. M., & TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
8.
FadigaL., CraigheroL., & OlivierE. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 213–218. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.013
9.
FadigaL., FogassiL., PavesiG. & RizzolattiG. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611. 14.
10.
GriffithsD., & TipperS. P. (2009). Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: Hand-centred effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(12), 2450–2470. doi:10.1080/17470210903103059
11.
HardwickR. M., & EdwardsM. G. (2011). Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(6), 1082–1093. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.538068
12.
KilnerJ. M., PaulignanY., & BlakemoreS.-J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522–525. doi 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
13.
KritikosA., DozoN., PainterD. and BaylissA. P. (2012). Mountain high, valley low: Direction-specific effects of articulation on reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 39–54. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.592951
14.
LeightonJ.BirdG., OrsiniC., & HeyesC. (2010). Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 905–910. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.001
15.
LundK., & BurgessC. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.
