ClelandA. A., & BullR. (2015). The role of numerical and non-numerical cues in nonsymbolic number processing: Evidence from the line bisection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.994537
2.
de HeviaM. D., GirelliL., & VallarG. (2006). Numbers and space: A cognitive illusion?Experimental Brain Research, 168(1–2), 254–264. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0084-0
3.
de HeviaM. D., & SpelkeE. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.003
4.
DehaeneS., BossiniS., & GirauxP. (1993). The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396.
5.
FaulkenberryT. J. (2014). Hand movements reflect competitive processing in numerical cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 147–151. doi:10.1037/cep0000021
6.
FinkG. R., MarshallJ. C., WeissP. H., ToniI., & ZillesK. (2002). Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: Evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 119–130. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00087-2
7.
GebuisT., & GeversW. (2011). Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition, 121(2), 248–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.008
GebuisT., & ReynvoetB. (2013). The neural mechanisms underlying passive and active processing of numerosity. NeuroImage, 70, 301–307. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.048
10.
HarveyB. M., KleinB. P., PetridouN., & DumoulinS. O. (2013). Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science, 341(6150), 1123–1126. doi:10.1126/science.1239052
11.
HubbardE. M., PiazzaM., PinelP., & DehaeneS. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435–448. doi:10.1038/nrn1684
12.
RolfeM. H., HammJ. P., & WaldieK. E. (2008). Differences in paper-and-pencil versus computerized line bisection according to ADHD subtype and hand-use. Brain and Cognition, 66(2), 188–195. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.07.007
13.
ScherbaumS., DshemuchadseM., FischerR., & GoschkeT. (2010). How decisions evolve: The temporal dynamics of action selection. Cognition, 115(3), 407–416. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.004
14.
SpiveyM. J., GrosjeanM., & KnoblichG. (2005). From The Cover: Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(29), 10393–10398. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503903102
15.
StöttingerE., AndersonB., DanckertJ., FrühholzB., & WoodG. (2012). Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length. Experimental Brain Research, 220(2), 147–152. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3125-5
16.
WoodG., & FischerM. H. (2008). Numbers, space, and action - From finger counting to the mental number line and beyond. Cortex, 44(4), 353–358. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.01.002