The varying value of a friendly face: Experimentally induced stress is associated with higher preferences for friendship with people possessing feminine versus masculine face traits
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2016
The varying value of a friendly face: Experimentally induced stress is associated with higher preferences for friendship with people possessing feminine versus masculine face traits
Social support can provide a buffer to the negative consequences of stress. Previous research suggests that stress can promote affiliative and cooperative behaviours in those who are stressed. Here we examined how stress might influence who we choose to affiliate with. We measured preferences for friendships with friendly appearing feminized faces versus less friendly appearing masculinized faces after individuals undertook a stressful laboratory task. Stressed individuals had increased preferences for friendships with people with feminine faces. These data demonstrate that individuals prefer more friendly appearing feminine faced people as friends when stressed than when not stressed. This preference is likely adaptive in directing individuals towards others who are most likely to provide social support when it is needed and so reflect strategic friendship preferences.
Amichai-HamburgerY., KingsburyM., & SchneiderB. H. (2013). Friendship: An old concept with a new meaning?Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.025
2.
BartelsA., & ZekiS. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11(17), 3829–3834. doi:10.1097/00001756-200011270-00046
3.
BensonP. J., & PerrettD. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception, 22, 257–262. doi:10.1068/p220257
4.
BerryD. S., & BrownlowS. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266–279. doi:10.1177/0146167289152013
5.
BondC. F., BerryD. S., & OmarA. (1994). The kernal of truth in judgements of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523–534. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1504_8
6.
CarreJ. M., & McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2651–2656. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0873
7.
CohenS., & WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
8.
DeVriesA. C., GlasperE. R., & DetillionC. E. (2003). Social modulation of stress responses. Physiology & Behavior, 79(3), 399–407. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00152-5
9.
DunbarR. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572. doi:10.1080/03014460902960289
10.
EisenbergerN. I. (2012). The pain of social disconnection: Examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(6), 421–434. doi:10.1038/nrn3231
11.
FeingoldA. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: a meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 226–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.226
12.
Holt-LunstadJ., SmithT. B., & LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7). doi:e100031610.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
13.
KirschbaumC., KudielkaB. M., GaabJ., SchommerN. C., & HellhammerD. H. (1999). Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61(2), 154–162. doi:10.1097/00006842-199903000-00006
14.
KornienkoO., ClemansK. H., OutD., & GrangerD. A. (2013). Friendship network position and salivary cortisol levels. Social Neuroscience, 8(4), 385–396. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.795500
15.
LittleA. C., DeBruineL. M., & JonesB. C. (2013). Environment contingent preferences: Exposure to visual cues of direct male-male competition and wealth increase women's preferences for masculinity in male faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 193–200. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.008
16.
LittleA. C., & HancockP. J. B. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 451–464. doi:10.1348/000712602761381349
17.
LittleA. C., JonesB. C., & DeBruineL. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0404
18.
LittleA. C., JonesB. C., DeBruineL. M., & DunbarR. I. M. (2013). Accuracy in discrimination of self-reported cooperators using static facial information. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 507–512. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.018
19.
LittleA. C., & PerrettD. I. (2007). Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 111–126. doi:10.1348/000712606X109648
20.
MartireL. M., & FranksM. M. (2014). The role of social networks in adult health: Introduction to the special issue. Health Psychology, 33(6), 501–504. doi:10.1037/hea0000103
21.
PerrettD. I., LeeK. J., Penton-VoakI. S., RowlandD. R., YoshikawaS., BurtD. M., … AkamatsuS. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887. doi:10.1038/29772
22.
PutmanP., HermansE. J., & van HonkJ. (2007). Exogenous cortisol shifts a motivated bias from fear to anger in spatial working memory for facial expressions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(1), 14–21. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.09.010
23.
RobertsS. G. B., & DunbarR. I. M. (2011). The costs of family and friends: an 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.005
24.
RushtonJ. P. (2009). Inclusive fitness in human relationships. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96(1), 8–12. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01110.x
25.
SeyfarthR. M., & CheneyD. L. (2012). The evolutionary origins of friendship. In FiskeS. T., SchacterD. L., & TaylorS. E. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 63, 153–177. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100337
26.
SmeetsT., CornelisseS., QuaedfliegC. W. E. M., MeyerT., JelicicM., & MerckelbachH. (2012). Introducing the Maastricht acute stress test (MAST): A quick and non-invasive approach to elicit robust autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(12), 1998–2008. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.04.012
27.
TaylorS. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 273–277. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00451.x
28.
TaylorS. E., KleinL. C., LewisB. P., GruenewaldT. L., GurungR. A. R., & UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
29.
TiddemanB. P., BurtD. M., & PerrettD. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50. doi:10.1109/38.946630
30.
Ulrich-LaiY. M., & HermanJ. P. (2009). Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 397–409. doi:10.1038/nrn2647
31.
van der HorstM., & CoffeH. (2012). How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 509–529. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9861-2
32.
von DawansB., FischbacherU., KirschbaumC., FehrE., & HeinrichsM. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: Acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science, 23(6), 651–660. doi:10.1177/0956797611431576
33.
WatkinsC. D., DeBruineL. M., LittleA. C., & JonesB. C. (2012). Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners. Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 340–347. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000162
