In visual search, observers try to find known target objects among distractors in visual scenes where the location of the targets is uncertain. This review article discusses the attentional processes that are active during search and their neural basis. Four successive phases of visual search are described. During the initial preparatory phase, a representation of the current search goal is activated. Once visual input has arrived, information about the presence of target-matching features is accumulated in parallel across the visual field (guidance). This information is then used to allocate spatial attention to particular objects (selection), before representations of selected objects are activated in visual working memory (recognition). These four phases of attentional control in visual search are characterized both at the cognitive level and at the neural implementation level. It will become clear that search is a continuous process that unfolds in real time. Selective attention in visual search is described as the gradual emergence of spatially specific and temporally sustained biases for representations of task-relevant visual objects in cortical maps.
AllportA. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
2.
AndersenS. K., HillyardS. A., & MüllerM. M. (2008). Attention facilitates multiple stimulus features in parallel in human visual cortex. Current Biology, 18, 1006–1009.
3.
AndersonD. E., VogelE. K., & AwhE. (2011). Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1128–1138.
4.
AndersonD. E., VogelE. K., & AwhE. (2013). A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychological Science, 24, 929–938.
5.
AwhE., Anllo-VentoL., & HillyardS. A. (2000). The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 840–847.
6.
AwhE., & JonidesJ. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126.
7.
AwhE., JonidesJ., & Reuter-LorenzP. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780–790.
8.
AwhE., VogelE. K., & OhS. H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201–208.
9.
BarM. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 600–609.
10.
BichotN. P., RossiA. F., & DesimoneR. (2005). Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science, 308, 529–534.
11.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
12.
BundesenC., HabekostT., & KyllingsbækS. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.
13.
CavanaghP., & AlvarezG. A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 349–354.
14.
ChawlaD., ReesG., & FristonK. J. (1999). The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 671–676.
15.
ChelazziL., DuncanJ., MillerE. K., & DesimoneR. (1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918–2940.
16.
ChunM. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170–178.
17.
ChunM. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1407–1409.
18.
ChunM. M., & JohnsonM. K. (2011). Memory: Enduring traces of perceptual and reflective attention. Neuron, 72, 520–535.
19.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.
20.
DehaeneS., & NaccacheL. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.
21.
DesimoneR., & DuncanJ. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
22.
DesimoneR., & GrossC. G. (1979). Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Research, 178, 363–380.
23.
D'EspositoM. (2007). From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 362, 761–772.
24.
DeubelH., & SchneiderW. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837.
25.
DowningP. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467–473.
26.
DrewT., & VogelE. K. (2008). Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4183–4191.
27.
DriverJ. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53–78.
DuncanJ. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.
30.
DuncanJ. (2006). EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2–27.
31.
DuncanJ., HumphreysG., & WardR. (1997). Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255–261.
32.
DuncanJ., & HumphreysG. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
33.
DuncanJ., WardR., & ShapiroK. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313–315.
34.
EimerM. (1994). “Sensory gating” as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 667–675.
35.
EimerM. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225–234.
36.
EimerM. (2014). The neural basis of attentional control in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 99, 225–234.
37.
EimerM., & GrubertA. (2014a). Spatial attention can be allocated rapidly and in parallel to new visual objects. Current Biology, 24, 193–198.
38.
EimerM., & GrubertA. (2014b). The gradual emergence of spatially selective target processing in visual search: From feature-specific to object-based attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1819–1831.
39.
EsterE. F., SerencesJ. T., & AwhE. (2009). Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 15258–15265.
40.
FannonS. P., SaronC. D., & MangunG. R. (2007). Baseline shifts do not predict attentional modulation of target processing during feature-based visual attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1, 7–18.
41.
FecteauJ. H., & MunozD. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 382–390.
42.
FranconeriS. L., AlvarezG. A., & CavanaghP. (2013). Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 134–141.
43.
FusterJ. M., & AlexanderG. E. (1971). Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science, 173, 652–654.
44.
GhorashiS., EnnsJ. T., KleinR. M., & Di LolloV. (2010). Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–12.
45.
GiesbrechtB., WeissmanD. H., WoldorffM. G., & MangunG. R. (2006). Pre-target activity in visual cortex predicts behavioral performance on spatial and feature attention tasks. Brain Research, 1080, 63–72.
46.
GirelliM., & LuckS. J. (1997). Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 238–253.
47.
GottliebJ. P., KusunokiM., & GoldbergM. E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481–484.
48.
GrattonG., CorballisP. M., & JainS. (1997). Hemispheric organization of visual memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 92–104.
49.
GrubertA., & EimerM. (2013). Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1433–1442.
50.
GrubertA., & EimerM. (2015). Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-colour and multiple-colour visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 86–101.
51.
HarrisonS. A., & TongF. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458, 632–635.
52.
HendersonJ. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504.
53.
HochsteinS., & AhissarM. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.
54.
HollingworthA. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition, 17, 273–291.
55.
HopfJ. M., BoelmansK., SchoenfeldM. A., LuckS. J., & HeinzeH. J. (2004). Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: Evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1822–1832.
56.
HopfJ. M., LuckS. J., GirelliM., HagnerT., MangunG. R., ScheichH., et al. (2000). Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1233–1241.
57.
HornakJ., DuncanJ., & GaffanD. (2002). The role of the vertical meridian in visual memory for objects. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1873–1880.
58.
HorowitzT. S., KliegerS. B., FencsikD. E., YangK. K., AlvarezG. A., & WolfeJ. M. (2007). Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 172–184.
59.
HorowitzT. S., WolfeJ. M., AlvarezG. A., CohenM. A., & KuzmovaY. I. (2009). The speed of free will. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2262–2288.
60.
HoutkampR., & RoelfsemaP. R. (2009). Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73, 317–326.
61.
HuangL., & PashlerH. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114, 599–631.
JamesW. (1890 /1981). The principles of psychology. Volume 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
64.
KatusT., GrubertA., & EimerM. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for a sensory recruitment model of somatosensory working memory. Cerebral Cortex. Online publication; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu153
65.
KhayatP. S., SpekreijseH., & RoelfsemaP. R. (2006). Attention lights up new object representations before the old ones fade away. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 138–142.
66.
KissM., GrubertA., & EimerM. (2013). Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 216–228.
67.
KravitzD. J., KriegeskorteN., & BakerC. I. (2010). High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2916–2925.
68.
KravitzD. J., SaleemK. S., BakerC. I., UngerleiderL. G., & MishkinM. (2013). The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 26–49.
69.
LuckS. J., ChelazziL., HillyardS. A., & DesimoneR. (1997). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 24–42.
70.
LuckS. J., & HillyardS. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000–1014.
71.
LuckS. J., & VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
72.
LuckS. J., & VogelE. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 391–400.
73.
MangunG. R., & HillyardS. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057–1074.
74.
Martinez-TrujilloJ. C., & TreueS. (2004). Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Current Biology, 14, 744–751.
75.
MaunsellJ. H., & TreueS. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 317–322.
76.
MazzaV., & CaramazzaA. (2011). Temporal brain dynamics of multiple object processing: the flexibility of individuation. PLoS One, 6, e17453. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017453
77.
MazzaV., TurattoM., UmiltàC., & EimerM. (2007). Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 531–536.
78.
McMainsS. A., FehdH. M., EmmanouilT. A., & KastnerS. (2007). Mechanisms of feature-and space-based attention: Response modulation and baseline increases. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 2110–2121.
79.
MenneerT., CaveK. R., & DonnellyN. (2009). The cost of search for multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 125–139.
80.
MooreT., & ArmstrongK. M. (2003). Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature, 421, 370–373.
81.
MooreT., ArmstrongK. M., & FallahM. (2003). Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention. Neuron, 40, 671–683.
82.
MoranJ., & DesimoneR. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.
83.
MüllerH. J., HellerD., & ZieglerJ. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1–17.
84.
NakoR., WuR., & EimerM. (2014). Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 50–60.
85.
NakoR., WuR., SmithT. J., & EimerM. (2014). Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1283–1288.
86.
OberauerK. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.
87.
OliversC. N., MeijerF., & TheeuwesJ. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243–1265.
88.
OliversC. N. L., & EimerM. (2011). On the difference between working memory and attentional set. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1553–1558.
89.
OliversC. N. L., PetersJ., HoutkampR., & RoelfsemaP. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
90.
Op De BeeckH., & VogelsR. (2000). Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 426, 505–518.
91.
PeelenM. V., Fei-FeiL., & KastnerS. (2009). Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature, 460, 94–97.
92.
PeelenM. V., & KastnerS. (2011). A neural basis for real-world visual search in human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 12125–12130.
93.
PosnerM. I., SnyderC. R., & DavidsonB. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
94.
PostleB. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23–38.
95.
RanganathC., CohenM. X., DamC., & D'EspositoM. (2004). Inferior temporal, prefrontal, and hippocampal contributions to visual working memory maintenance and associative memory retrieval. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3917–3925.
96.
RaymondJ. E., ShapiroK. L., & ArnellK. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.
97.
SaenzM., BuracasG. T., & BoyntonG. M. (2002). Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 631–632.
98.
SchallJ. D. (2004). On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vision Research, 44, 1453–1467.
99.
SerencesJ. T., & BoyntonG. M. (2007). Feature-based attentional modulations in the absence of direct visual stimulation. Neuron, 55, 301–312.
100.
SotoD., HeinkeD., HumphreysG. W., & BlancoM. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261.
101.
SreenivasanK. K., CurtisC. E., & D'EspositoM. (2014). Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 82–89.
102.
StokesM., ThompsonR., NobreA. C., & DuncanJ. (2009). Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 19569–19574.
103.
StokesM. G., KusunokiM., SigalaN., NiliH., GaffanD., & DuncanJ. (2013). Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 78, 364–375.
104.
StroudM. J., MenneerT., CaveK. R., DonnellyN., & RaynerK. (2011). Search for multiple targets of different colours: Misguided eye movements reveal a reduction of colour selectivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 971–982.
105.
TheeuwesJ. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99.
106.
ThompsonK. G., & BichotN. P. (2005). A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. Progress in Brain Research, 147, 249–262.
107.
ToddJ. J., & MaroisR. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.
108.
TowlerJ., KellyM., & EimerM. (2015). The focus of spatial attention determines the number and precision of face representations in working memory. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv083
109.
TreismanA. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 201–237.
110.
TreismanA., & GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
111.
TreismanA., & SatoS. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478.
112.
VogelE. K., & MachizawaM. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.
113.
WardenM. R., & MillerE. K. (2010). Task-dependent changes in short-term memory in the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 30, 15801–15810.
114.
WheelerM. E., & TreismanA. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.
115.
WolfeJ. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.
116.
WolfeJ. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.
117.
WolfeJ. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In GrayW. (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford.
118.
WolfeJ. M., & HorowitzT. S. (2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
119.
WybleB., BowmanH., & NieuwensteinM. (2009). The attentional blink provides episodic distinctiveness: Sparing at a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 787–807.
120.
XuY., & ChunM. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91–95.
121.
XuY., & ChunM. M. (2009). Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 167–174.
122.
ZelinskyG. J., & SheinbergD. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel–serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 244–262.
