What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults

Abstract

Previous research has shown that comprehenders do not always conduct a full (re)analysis of temporarily ambiguous “garden-path” sentences. The present study used a sentence–picture matching task to investigate what kind of representations are formed when full reanalysis is not performed: Do comprehenders “blend” two incompatible representations as a result of shallow syntactic processing or do they erroneously maintain the initial incorrect parsing without incorporating new information, and does this vary with age? Twenty-five younger and 15 older adults performed a multiple-choice sentence–picture matching task with stimuli including early-closure garden-path sentences. The results suggest that the type of erroneous representation is affected by linguistic variables, such as sentence structure, verb type, and semantic plausibility, as well as by age. Older adults’ response patterns indicate an increased reliance on inferencing based on lexical and semantic cues, with a lower bar for accepting an initial parse and with a weaker drive to reanalyse a syntactic representation. Among younger adults, there was a tendency to blend two representations into a single interpretation, even if this was not licensed by the syntax.